ProSoundWeb Community

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Pages: [1] 2 3   Go Down

Author Topic: Phono Preamp Frequency Response  (Read 14928 times)

Patrick Tracy

  • SR Forums
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 513
  • Boulder, CO, USA
    • Boulder Sound Guy
Phono Preamp Frequency Response
« on: December 25, 2013, 04:21:32 PM »

Obviously the RIAA LP playback curve will be there, but how well is it implemented?

I compared the two I could get to easily, the one in my home receiver (Onkyo TX-DS474) and a Realistic 42-2101A I picked up at a flea market. Input level was not changed for these two measurements. The receiver's signal was taken from its tape output. No smoothing was used.

The Realistic 42-2101A:




Two things are clear. The Realistic has more gain, and its LF rolls off at a higher frequency. You can also see a bit of 60Hz/120Hz getting into the Onkyo's signal. From about 150Hz up the Realistic slopes gently down relative to the Onkyo.

Perhaps at some point I can measure in/out voltages to get actual gain figures, and maybe measure the THD.

I'm curious how other phono preamplifiers compare, from DJ mixers to audiophile gear.

John Roberts {JR}

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 17186
  • Hickory, Mississippi, USA
    • Resotune
Re: Phono Preamp Frequency Response
« Reply #1 on: December 25, 2013, 04:33:00 PM »

To make a EQ quality comparison, you need to normalize the gain of both at 1kHz.

The poles and zeros for RIAA eq are 3180 uSec, 318uSec and 75 usec, From looking at those plots the Onkyo looks closer to proper RIAA, than the realistic, that's not that realistic.

RIAA does not define transfer function below 20 Hz and above 20 kHz (was 30 Hz and 15kHz originally). Later IEC proposed adding another pole at 7950 uSec, but RIAA ignored them too.

I wouldn't lose too much sleep over this. cartridge loading can make noticeable differences in top octave.

JR
Logged
Cancel the "cancel culture". Do not participate in mob hatred.

Ivan Beaver

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 9538
  • Atlanta GA
Re: Phono Preamp Frequency Response
« Reply #2 on: December 25, 2013, 07:19:29 PM »

I don't know a lot about the details of the RIAA curve-but could possibly the difference be between a ceramic and a magnetic cartridge intended usage.

It has been a few decades-but I seem to remember different settings on some receivers which had a different "sound".
Logged
A complex question is easily answered by a simple-easy to understand WRONG answer!

Ivan Beaver
Danley Sound Labs

PHYSICS- NOT FADS!

Patrick Tracy

  • SR Forums
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 513
  • Boulder, CO, USA
    • Boulder Sound Guy
Re: Phono Preamp Frequency Response
« Reply #3 on: December 25, 2013, 07:47:36 PM »

I don't know a lot about the details of the RIAA curve-but could possibly the difference be between a ceramic and a magnetic cartridge intended usage.

It has been a few decades-but I seem to remember different settings on some receivers which had a different "sound".

I think by the time the Realistic preamp was made pretty much all cartridges, aside from those for kids' turntables, were magnetic.

Ivan Beaver

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 9538
  • Atlanta GA
Re: Phono Preamp Frequency Response
« Reply #4 on: December 25, 2013, 08:03:10 PM »

I think by the time the Realistic preamp was made pretty much all cartridges, aside from those for kids' turntables, were magnetic.
I had some turntables that were "medium grade" and were  ceramic.  They were still being sold as individual "separates" untll the late 70s (or later) I believe.

Agreed all the "real" ones were magnetic.
Logged
A complex question is easily answered by a simple-easy to understand WRONG answer!

Ivan Beaver
Danley Sound Labs

PHYSICS- NOT FADS!

John Roberts {JR}

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 17186
  • Hickory, Mississippi, USA
    • Resotune
Re: Phono Preamp Frequency Response
« Reply #5 on: December 25, 2013, 08:41:55 PM »

I'll bet dollars to donuts that the rat shack pre is using crappy lousy tolerance cheap capacitors in the EQ playback network. The Onkyo is probably using only slightly better parts.

They look like they are designed for the same spec, just don't expect precision components from a $2 BOM.   

JR
Logged
Cancel the "cancel culture". Do not participate in mob hatred.

Bob Leonard

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6807
  • Boston, MA USA
Re: Phono Preamp Frequency Response
« Reply #6 on: December 25, 2013, 08:51:16 PM »

What's the goal here??
Logged
BOSTON STRONG........
Proud Vietnam Veteran

I did a gig for Otis Elevator once. Like every job, it had it's ups and downs.

Patrick Tracy

  • SR Forums
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 513
  • Boulder, CO, USA
    • Boulder Sound Guy
Re: Phono Preamp Frequency Response
« Reply #7 on: December 25, 2013, 09:19:59 PM »

What's the goal here??

It's the Basement. There doesn't have to be a goal. But if anybody feels like posting something for comparison it would certainly be interesting to me. For example, are there substantial differences between basic home audio stuff, esoteric stuff, DJ stuff...? The loading issue clouds things a bit, but I think it's still useful information.

John Roberts {JR}

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 17186
  • Hickory, Mississippi, USA
    • Resotune
Re: Phono Preamp Frequency Response
« Reply #8 on: December 25, 2013, 10:42:24 PM »

It's the Basement. There doesn't have to be a goal. But if anybody feels like posting something for comparison it would certainly be interesting to me. For example, are there substantial differences between basic home audio stuff, esoteric stuff, DJ stuff...? The loading issue clouds things a bit, but I think it's still useful information.

Yawn,,,,  I used to design high end (IMO) phono preamp (kits) back in the '70s-'80s. A good preamp would follow the RIAA spec to within a small fraction of a dB. Another subtle point if you want to properly terminate the preamp input, the source impedance of a typical MM cart was around 1-1.5k with some inductance.

After decades of designing preamps I came to the conclusion that customer behavior wrt to proper capacitance termination (for the specific cartridge), made a larger difference than my 1% resistors and 2% caps in the EQ network.

A cheap preamp OTOH can vary, and it was not that unusual to cheat a phono input in a pinch with tone controls maxed full boost on the bass end, and full cut on the treble. RIAA EQ varies about +/-20dB wrt 1khz gain. 

JR
Logged
Cancel the "cancel culture". Do not participate in mob hatred.

Kevin Graf

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 344
Re: Phono Preamp Frequency Response
« Reply #9 on: December 25, 2013, 11:01:35 PM »

One of JR's pre-amps.
Logged
Speedskater

ProSoundWeb Community

Re: Phono Preamp Frequency Response
« Reply #9 on: December 25, 2013, 11:01:35 PM »


Pages: [1] 2 3   Go Up
 



Site Hosted By Ashdown Technologies, Inc.

Page created in 0.055 seconds with 22 queries.