ProSoundWeb Community

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Pages: [1] 2  All   Go Down

Author Topic: X32 vs. X32 Compact  (Read 11995 times)

paul bell

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 608
X32 vs. X32 Compact
« on: August 09, 2013, 10:36:40 am »

Can anybody tell me the differences between these two consoles?
Logged

Jason Lucas

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 806
  • Hillsboro, OR, USA
Re: X32 vs. X32 Compact
« Reply #1 on: August 09, 2013, 11:05:00 am »

Compact has fewer local inputs and outputs (16 XLR in, 8 XLR out vs 32 XLR in, 16 XLR out on the full sized)

Compact also has only 8 input faders as opposed to 16 on the full sized version.

I believe that's the extent of it, someone else can chime in if they have more info.
Logged
There are three things I hate: Harsh highs, hollow mids, and woofy bass.

paul bell

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 608
Re: X32 vs. X32 Compact
« Reply #2 on: August 09, 2013, 11:24:19 am »

Thanks Jason!

I have an install to bid and after they reject my recommendation of a Midas Pro1, I may step down to the X32 Compact.

I've seen a few out there already so they're taking hold. Not a bad comment about them yet, nothing but good reviews.
Logged

Nicolas Poisson

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 147
  • Paris, France
Re: X32 vs. X32 Compact
« Reply #3 on: August 09, 2013, 12:48:31 pm »

The "compact" version is not that much smaller, not that much lighter, and marginally cheaper than the "full" version. Is size a real constraint ? Then the X32 "producer" (not yet available) might be a better choice.
Logged

paul bell

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 608
Re: X32 vs. X32 Compact
« Reply #4 on: August 09, 2013, 08:08:37 pm »

Good call Nicolas!

As I researched this further I found exactly what you say to be true. The compact is really no less money than the full X32.

Just to clarify, it's the full X32 that I've seen in use, not the compact.
Logged

Scott Bolt

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1348
Re: X32 vs. X32 Compact
« Reply #5 on: August 09, 2013, 08:16:16 pm »

Good call Nicolas!

As I researched this further I found exactly what you say to be true. The compact is really no less money than the full X32.

Just to clarify, it's the full X32 that I've seen in use, not the compact.

Note that the Producer DOES differ from the X32 full (and compact) in several meaningful ways.

  • No LCD Scribble strips
  • 5" vs 7" LCD display
  • dedicated Mute group and assign buttons and encoders are removed
  • No AES digital port

Now granted, you have to take into account how much smaller the Producer is than the compact (seems like a naming issue to me).  It is also $500.00 less expensive.

The missing LCD Scribble strips are the big ommission for me.  If you are only using 16 inputs, then it may not be too big a deal, and you may be able to find a way to use old fassioned label tape to do the job for 2 layers.

IMHO if you ever intend on using a digital snake to a S16 stage box (thus raising your input count to 32), the lack of scribble strips would simply be impossible to work with (ie, 4 groups of 8 faders to attempt to remember what input is on what position on what layer  :P ).
« Last Edit: August 09, 2013, 10:14:15 pm by Scott Bolt »
Logged

Jason Lucas

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 806
  • Hillsboro, OR, USA
Re: X32 vs. X32 Compact
« Reply #6 on: August 09, 2013, 09:03:18 pm »

Note that the producer DOES differ from the X32 full (and compact) in several meaningful ways.

FTFY
Logged
There are three things I hate: Harsh highs, hollow mids, and woofy bass.

Corey Scogin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1108
  • Birmingham, AL, US
Re: X32 vs. X32 Compact
« Reply #7 on: August 09, 2013, 09:42:50 pm »

Note that the compact Producer DOES differ from the X32 full (and compact) in several meaningful ways.

Fixed that for you.
Logged

Scott Bolt

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1348
Re: X32 vs. X32 Compact
« Reply #8 on: August 09, 2013, 10:14:44 pm »

Fixed that for you.

Oops.  Thanks ;)  Fixed it.
Logged

Tiago de Sousa

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 30
Re: X32 vs. X32 Compact
« Reply #9 on: June 13, 2017, 11:20:20 pm »

Compact has fewer local inputs and outputs (16 XLR in, 8 XLR out vs 32 XLR in, 16 XLR out on the full sized)

Compact also has only 8 input faders as opposed to 16 on the full sized version.

I believe that's the extent of it, someone else can chime in if they have more info.

Sorry but XLR ins don't mean anything at all, XLR is just a connector

X32 has 32 Microphone Preamps
X32 Compact has only 16 Microphone Preamps

X32 has 16 Balanced Line Outputs + 6 unbalanced Line Outputs
X32 Compact has 8 Balanced Line Outputs + 6 unbalanced Line Outputs 

X32 has 4 Assinable encoders and 8 assinable buttons
X32 Compact doesn't have any assinable encoders, but has the 8 assinable buttons

X32 has 16 channel faders per bank
X32 Compact has 8 channel faders per bank

On the X32 compact you can extend the channel faders to the DCA/BUS right fader section, on the X32 you can't do this

X32 has 40 channels
X32 Compact has 32 Channels

https://www.sweetwater.com/sweetcare/articles/how-does-the-behringer-x32-compact-differ-from-the-x32/

« Last Edit: June 13, 2017, 11:23:33 pm by Tiago de Sousa »
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  All   Go Up
 


Page created in 0.045 seconds with 23 queries.