chris haywood wrote on Mon, 06 August 2007 17:33 |
...it should only be used by knowledgeable individuals with electrical such as myself... |
chris haywood wrote on Tue, 07 August 2007 09:56 |
In the field of electrical, I make the credibility calls |
Quote: |
Really, you've stuck your foot in a bodily orifice or two already. Don't up the count. |
chris haywood wrote on Mon, 06 August 2007 16:56 |
LETS HAVE A TEST Unlike others who make statements and then run without providing any technical information as to how they come to conclusions, or make recommendations, I am prepared to answer electrical questions to give all more insight.. and then we can all make an INFORMED judgment call on credibility... Just the way I like it, informed. In the field of electrical, I make the credibility calls |
Quote: |
Okay. Here's the test: - When you use your illegal adapter to parallel two 20A circuits, does the venue pay the fine, or do you? - When a fire results due to an overloaded neutral, does everyone make it out? - When you find you are unzipped in a public forum do you get quiet and say "oops" or do you wave it around? Peace, Vince |
dave stojan wrote on Mon, 06 August 2007 18:54 |
Oops! I thought you were the guy that suggested a 30amp to 20 amp adapter! I see I missed YOUR posts. From what's left of them I can see where you were coming from (somewhat) but hoo-boy, NEVER try to learn somebody something like that over the keyboard! Good luck. One last bit of advice (which I intend to observe): When you're in a hole, stop digging! Shovel be gone thou foul beast! |
Quote: |
No, he suggested to build a 30 amp to dual 20 amp adapter, even dumber... |
chris haywood wrote on Mon, 06 August 2007 19:02 |
Evan ol buddy! I knew you wouldnt be late.... ok lets look at your melt down... unfortunately I am limited to a full diagnosis from a picture... Now im good, but not that good, so i will point out the obvious... first of all, from the looks of the pic, loose connections to a sub panel or similar melted down.... Loose connections are most likely because the burn out is in one area, but loose connections are only the most likely, without being there, its a whole different story... No company will ever attempt diagnosis from a picture, lets be real here... but I say, good questions Evan gets D+ |
chris haywood wrote on Mon, 06 August 2007 18:02 |
Since we have a judgement call here, what exactly do you mean? and what did I mean? since 'dumber' is used, what are the technical details behind 'dumber'? |
Quote: |
No sub panel being fed from this guy. Someone physically torched the buss bars, burning the panel and melting some breakers. |
Quote: |
Illegal. Unsafe. Dumberer, even. |
Quote: |
Chris I'm certainly no electrician (so I won't comment on safety), but I have not seen you refute the illegality of your method. Is the electrical procedure in question legal to perform in your area? |
chris haywood wrote on Mon, 06 August 2007 14:56 |
LETS HAVE A TEST Unlike others who make statements and then run without providing any technical information as to how they come to conclusions, or make recommendations, I am prepared to answer electrical questions to give all more insight.. and then we can all make an INFORMED judgment call on credibility... Just the way I like it, informed. In the field of electrical, I make the credibility calls |
Quote: |
Chris, a few Q's: -When you are trying to get 130dB at FOH (with 10dB of headroom, naturally) and you blow the fuse, do you put a penny in it next time? -Did your audience leave because it sounded like crap, because it was too loud, or because the venue was on fire? All of the above? -Are you that guy who disconnects the ground cam on their distro to get rid of system hum? -JB |
chris haywood wrote on Mon, 06 August 2007 19:37 |
2 15 or 20 amp circuits supplying a single 30 amp load (current stays the same in a series circuit) but in a parrelel circuit voltage remains the same, thus safely increasing available CURRENT to amplifier, NOT CHANGING WIRE SIZE IN WALLS, OR BREAKERS..... AND PRESENTING ZERO SAFETY HAZARD.. |
chris haywood wrote on Mon, 06 August 2007 16:37 |
(current stays the same in a series circuit) but in a parrelel (learn to fucking spell) circuit voltage remains the same, thus safely increasing available CURRENT to amplifier, NOT CHANGING WIRE SIZE IN WALLS, OR BREAKERS..... AND PRESENTING ZERO SAFETY HAZARD.. |
Quote: |
Now do we see the light? now we see how silly all of the complaints are with this knowledge? |
chris haywood wrote on Mon, 06 August 2007 16:42 |
This is my field! YEEE HAAAA! |
Evan Kirkendall wrote on Tue, 07 August 2007 10:42 |
Name 3 things wrong/broken with this panel, and tell me what kind of panel it is |
Fred Merkle wrote on Mon, 06 August 2007 18:42 | ||
[BUZZER] Wrong. You cannot guarantee that the current will evenly divide between the two neutrals. Worst case is all current goes down one of them. Since your breaker is only high-side, you just started a fire. (Certainly the fire part depends on how long you run it in such a configuration.) I apologize for yelling: THERE IS NO SAFE WAY TO PARALLEL TWO HOUSHOLD AC CIRCUITS IN AN ATTEMPT TO GET MORE CURRENT THAN ANY ONE CIRCUIT IS RATED FOR. -Fred |
chris haywood wrote on Mon, 06 August 2007 16:51 |
Mac ol buddy ol pal, you know there is an overwhelming need to prove me wrong here, so its hard to deny such a temptation... In a little while, I will have this all straightened out, I promise... I just have a few more posts to respond to... |
chris haywood wrote on Mon, 06 August 2007 18:51 |
Mac ol buddy ol pal, you know there is an overwhelming need to prove me wrong here, so its hard to deny such a temptation... In a little while, I will have this all straightened out, I promise... I just have a few more posts to respond to... |
Andy Peters wrote on Mon, 06 August 2007 18:42 | ||||
So, you are advocating paralleling two circuits, which is basically combining two hots after their respective breakers. You'd better fucking hope that they're on the same phase. And that the local electrical inspector doesn't see it.
We see how silly you are in advocating such a thing. -a |
Andy Peters wrote on Mon, 06 August 2007 18:44 | ||
I think I speak for many here, but put it this way: I don't want a fucking cowboy anywhere near my mains service. Thanks for playing. Now, Heywood Yabuzzoff. -a |
chris haywood wrote on Mon, 06 August 2007 19:55 | ||||
Fred ol buddy, dont forget something you left out, current takes the path of least resistance, that makes all current traveling down 1 nuetrel completley impossible... Fred you get a C+, good thought... |
Nathan Vanderslice wrote on Mon, 06 August 2007 18:47 |
Chris, Why don't you just change one of the 20 amp breakers in the panel for a 40 amp breaker? N-O-O-O-O-O-T. What you were proposing was to tie two 20 amp circuits from different locations in the house to make a 40 amp circuit. Now I'm no electrician, and my knowledge of wiring is limited, But I think you can in fact put two 20 amp fuses together in parallel to have one 40 amp protective device, howver, the load side of the wiring HAS to be compatible with that 40 amp load capability. Two 12ga wires running through different parts of the house just doesn't cut it..... |
chris haywood wrote on Mon, 06 August 2007 19:25 |
Anyone else before this topic is locked up? Thank you... Of course illegitimate questions are preferred, lets try to keep out the silly things, and ask legitimate questions, but be sure there is some educational background to confirm the accuracy of my statements... As it stands now, I am still here with an A+ grade level of credibility, of course and unfortunately, there are some insecure individuals who cant stand that kind of thing, but it is so anyhow... I didnt have to be so cocky about it, but I wasnt until some wise cracks came across, and its only fair that i respond with wise cracks of the WHIP! |
chris haywood wrote on Mon, 06 August 2007 18:55 |
Fred ol buddy, dont forget something you left out, current takes the path of least resistance, that makes all current traveling down 1 nuetrel completley impossible... Fred you get a C+, good thought... |
Mark Dawson wrote on Mon, 06 August 2007 18:55 |
To Chris and others like him: Also do not sugggest dodgy adapters or workarounds in a public forum. |
Tony "T" Tissot wrote on Mon, 06 August 2007 19:00 | ||
Chris - no one cares about "proving" anything. Most of us just want to be certain that your posts are clearly disavowed by this community so that others do not emulate your unsafe practices. |
Quote: |
After checking any other devices on either of the 2 circuits, best if there are none for the super safety people, but if there are some, your electrical knowledge will confirm or deny the saftey of each device electrically in such arrangements... now that being out of the way... 2 15 or 20 amp circuits supplying a single 30 amp load (current stays the same in a series circuit) but in a parrelel circuit voltage remains the same, thus safely increasing available CURRENT to amplifier, NOT CHANGING WIRE SIZE IN WALLS, OR BREAKERS..... AND PRESENTING ZERO SAFETY HAZARD.. |
Evan Kirkendall wrote on Mon, 06 August 2007 17:14 |
Chris, ol' buddy, ol' pal, this sums all of your posts up pretty well: Evan |
Vince Byrne wrote on Mon, 06 August 2007 19:00 | ||
Hopeless rectal cranial inversion. I'm out. |
Mark Dawson wrote on Mon, 06 August 2007 19:03 |
Rite, next round time:........ To build a "portable adapter" suitable for combining two household circuits would almost certainly involve a situation where a male plug (anatomy here people its the boy) to become live. Hopefully when this occurs the path of least resistance is through you and not an innocent bystander or bill-paying client. There was a case a few years ago here where a dopey sparky managed to make an extension lead with two male ends on it. Fried himself really well |
Vince Byrne wrote on Mon, 06 August 2007 19:07 |
You know, at least the kid DJ dishing on his first kiss has an excuse ... |
Mark Dawson wrote on Mon, 06 August 2007 19:29 |
And before I get flamed for spelling on our side of the planet colour has a 'U' |
chris haywood wrote on Mon, 06 August 2007 20:31 | ||
I have run into people who have fried themselves many times, thats where I come in to straighten it out.... 2 male ends? NAY, this would need to be a specially constructed arrangement NOT involving just 2 male ends... What would that be for? This involves more than just 2 male plugs |
Dan Mills wrote on Mon, 06 August 2007 19:07 |
Now I don't do American electrics, but we have a name for a parallel pair of plugs over here in the UK, we call it a 'widowmaker' for good reason. If one end is unplugged then you potentially have 110V on an exposed male connector, there is no way to make this safe, furthermore there are all the issues with poorly protected neutrals. Further, my reading of the US NEC holds that parallel cables are ONLY allowed above a size much larger then your extension, and even then must be fed from the same breaker and must follow the same path? How do I score? Regards, Dan. |
chris haywood wrote on Mon, 06 August 2007 |
remember, this is not a house wiring situation, this was a question on how to make alternative arrangements to compensate for lack of power supply to a given area... |
Nathan Vanderslice wrote on Mon, 06 August 2007 19:38 |
By the way, I'm not getting upset with what you have said, I'm finding it totally laughable, |
Quote: |
my concern is that your bad advice doesn't get someone else hurt or in trouble. As I said before, I hope YOU don't end up killing someone either. |
Mike Lieman wrote on Tue, 07 August 2007 01:48 |
1-800-Rent-a-Genny |
Mark Dawson wrote on Mon, 06 August 2007 20:29 |
...And before I get flamed for spelling on our side of the planet colour has a 'U' |
Tony "T" Tissot wrote on Mon, 06 August 2007 20:26 | ||
Except that there is no evidence of "careful wording". I suspect that Chris is borderline illiterate, as evidenced by his misuse of many common words, lack of subject specificity and inability to keep clauses coherent. |
Mac Kerr wrote on Tue, 07 August 2007 00:43 |
I am not going to just lock every thread this troll posts in. If you don't read his posts you won't respond to them and he will either go away, or live a lonely existance talking to himself. You do yourselves a disservice by responding. Mac |
Fred Merkle wrote on Mon, 06 August 2007 19:07 | ||||||
My point exactly. Let's say you're drawing 30A off of two 20A circuits where one neutral has a resistance of .5ohms and the other is .1ohms. The amount of current going through the former neutral is 5A, while 25A goes through the latter. Since we're talking household wiring and a breaker only on the hot, you're now exceeding the current draw the latter neutral is rated for. Too much current == fire. I am done, as Mac suggested. Also. I am not your buddy. You have never met me; you wouldn't like me. -Fred |
Vince Byrne wrote on Mon, 06 August 2007 19:52 | ||||
You know, it's kind of like watching a drunk guy piss himself. But not at my gig, that would be gross.
Darwin in action. Chris or the fool that listens to him. Actually Chris is A+, I'm sure he's got more! Peace, Vince |
chris haywood wrote on Mon, 06 August 2007 22:15 | ||||||
Vince ol buddy! YEEEE HAAAA! ride on horsey! interpretations are so much fun arent they? but accuracy and interpretation dont always point in the same direction... accuracy of interpretation is defined by understanding... Do you know what understanding is? dont pee on yourself vince ol buddy! piece! |
Al Limberg wrote on Mon, 06 August 2007 20:09 |
After wasting 20 minutes reading this entire thread a couple things come to mind; 1. Fred is my kinda guy...I think we'd get along. 2. If my 16 year old son came to me spouting this drivel I'd wash his mouth out with soap and wouldn't pay him for the next seven nights of festivals starting this week. 3. I thought we just got rid of Tim Duffin. ?;o) Al |
Jason Lavoie wrote on Mon, 06 August 2007 20:42 |
OK, I just had to post because I think we're headed for a record.. 4 pages of posts in less than one day! and, to throw in a hazard that I don't think has been mentioned yet: what happens when you pop one of the two breakers and around the same time your consumption drops a bit so the second one doesn't go. now you have your cheater plug supplying power to a circuit via an outlet. backfeeding is most certainly not legal, and any device or scenario that could lead to backfeeding automatically rules it out as safe. so, you get an automatic F oops, sorry. I guess only YOU are allowed to assign people random grades. Jason Lavoie, B.Eng (Electrical) |
Evan Kirkendall wrote on Mon, 06 August 2007 21:22 | ||||||||
Chris, So, This is my last post on this subject. And you are now going to be the first to be on my ignore list. Evan |
chris haywood wrote on Tue, 07 August 2007 12:35 |
Legal seems to be a big thing, have you ever ran a stop sign? is that legal? nay, but you will do it again wont you, because you are capable of discerning safety in the area of the stop sign... would you run a stop sign in rush hour or the middle of the night? can you see the difference? same thing, no inspector would sign off on such a deal, neither would the police man, its all about your knowledge, this will be the safety factor... |
Chris Davis wrote on Mon, 06 August 2007 20:42 | ||||
Agreed... I got down this far in the thread and won't go any farther. That is 10 or 15 minutes of my time I will never see again. Is this forum starting to seem like the gong show for anyone else? |
Pascal Pincosy wrote on Mon, 06 August 2007 20:54 | ||
There's this really useful button on the right side of each post that says "ignore all messages by this user". Better to use it than waste all our times by posting responses to the moron. This whole thread is a waste. |
Steve Hurt wrote on Mon, 06 August 2007 21:39 |
I broke my foot Friday an am now stuck at home for 6-8 weeks so I've been watching stuff I wouldn't normally watch on TV and reading threads I wouldn't read due to shear boredom, and I have to say: This thread is almost as entertaining as Jerry Springer! (not quite as smart though) |
Jamie Taylor wrote on Mon, 06 August 2007 21:41 | ||
Legal is a big thing, because people get Jailed for doing stupid things with electricity where I come from. Plus, being a professional, I like to do things the right way. Hell, I like to do things SAFELY. I'm with Evan, I didn't even push the 'ignore' button on Duffin. |
chris haywood wrote on Tue, 07 August 2007 12:57 |
Jamie ol buddy! |
chris haywood wrote on Tue, 07 August 2007 12:57 |
and you have run a stop sign too havent you? |
Dan Mills wrote on Mon, 06 August 2007 20:00 | ||
Works for me, but is possibly a little overkill. How about just not turning the amp up all the way? Failing that, a COMPETENT electrician could easily be summoned to pull a length of suitable (SJOOW? (Sorry I am not well up on American cable designations)) to a breaker panel, there to be terminated into a suitable breaker.... Plenty of ways to skin this particular cat while remaining code compliant and more importantly safe, and none of them involve widowmakers! Regards, Dan. |
Pascal Pincosy wrote on Mon, 06 August 2007 21:54 | ||
There's this really useful button on the right side of each post that says "ignore all messages by this user". Better to use it than waste all our times by posting responses to the moron. This whole thread is a waste. |
Josh Billings wrote on Mon, 06 August 2007 21:58 |
Chris man you gotta know this is a bad idea. I think the 30 amp adapter chris was talking about was this. And it's completely safe and rated for marine use P.S. This is the pigtail Y adapter i was talking about for those 30 amp kitchen plugs. Handy thing to use when you're setting up a beefy rack with no distro. http://www.boatersoutlet.com/index.asp?PageAction=VIEWPROD&a mp;a mp;ProdID=1783 P.P.S. Totally joking about that 2 pronged household extension cord. -Josh Billings |
Jamie Taylor wrote on Mon, 06 August 2007 21:59 | ||||
No, I'm not.
No, I haven't. Thanks for playing. |
chris haywood wrote on Mon, 06 August 2007 19:37 | ||
My method is that of using an extension cord... you do so at your own risk, you can start a fire with an extension cord if you are clueless... Is an extension cord illegal? NAY... Here are the technical details.... After checking any other devices on either of the 2 circuits, best if there are none for the super safety people, but if there are some, your electrical knowledge will confirm or deny the saftey of each device electrically in such arrangements... now that being out of the way... 2 15 or 20 amp circuits supplying a single 30 amp load (current stays the same in a series circuit) but in a parrelel circuit voltage remains the same, thus safely increasing available CURRENT to amplifier, NOT CHANGING WIRE SIZE IN WALLS, OR BREAKERS..... AND PRESENTING ZERO SAFETY HAZARD.. Now do we see the light? now we see how silly all of the complaints are with this knowledge? Legal? no alterations to building electrical systems exist, infact, this method is MORE SAFE! than using a single 15 or 20 am oultet for a 30 amp load... |
Peter Etheredge wrote on Mon, 06 August 2007 22:05 |
Chris ol' buddy ol' pal good sir fine chap you dog you g-unit! If you are so convinced that you are correct in your electrical knowledge why bother argue on the internet about it? In fact, instead of arguing why don't you just go make some of these little do-dads and try them out! Set up a web came at your house so that we can all watch. This is your big chance to show everyone once and for all how awesome you are! Oh, and you will be doing society a huge favor by removing yourself from the gene pool when you die a horrible electrical related fatality; all while the whole wide interwebs is watching you! YOU'RE THE MAN NOW DOG! |
chris haywood wrote on Mon, 06 August 2007 22:35 | ||
lets say one breaker trips, and now you do have a single breaker supplying both circuits... so what is the WORST THING that can happen? Answer, The 2nd breaker gets overloaded and trips as well... simple enough? |
E. Lee Dickinson wrote on Mon, 06 August 2007 22:45 | ||||
Umm, no, the worst that can happen is just exactly what Jason described: A fault condition on one circuit causing its breaker to trip, but that fault is still being fed current via the other circuit to which you have tied it. Burn, baby, burn (Disco Inferno!) |
Quote: |
Well, you have zero credibility with me as far as knowing safe and legal ways to power things. Sad What you describe is completely non-legal as per the National Electrical Code. Confused Pack it in. You ware wasting time and space here. You are a newcomer here and as such have yet to demonstrate anything that would be credible in my opinion. |
chris haywood wrote on Mon, 06 August 2007 23:56 |
you say fault? |
Quote: |
fault?? |
Quote: |
Ok lets do the abc's are you ready? |
Quote: |
most common breakers are not associated with the word fault... you are confusing them with gfi (ground fault interupt).. |
Quote: |
breakers trip from too much current, there are typically and most commonly 2 types of breakers, heat sensative and current sensative.... |
Quote: |
if this doesnt make sense, then its time to go to school... I give you a C for effort |
E. Lee Dickinson wrote on Tue, 07 August 2007 00:16 |
...Man I hope this thread gets locked soon.. I just can't seem to control myself even though I know better! |
Mike Gazdziak wrote on Mon, 06 August 2007 23:09 |
what was your plan for not having the potential for a live male plug with this rig? |
chris haywood wrote on Tue, 07 August 2007 15:48 |
First, I make no claims as to the legality of this arrangement, and suggest you do not try this at home, or anywhere else for that matter unless you are a qualified electrically educated individual... |
Mike Butler (media) wrote on Mon, 06 August 2007 23:24 | ||
It's easy, Lee! Evan and I have already done it. See that "ignore all messages by this user" over on the right side? Right below "add to buddy list" (which I'm sure you don't want to do, even though he calls everyone his buddy ) Just like magic! |
Quote: |
I've been. I learned how to spell "sensitive" and "interrupt," how to use apostrophes, and how to work with electricity. Which school did you go to? The one that teaches yer gud speling and how to wire a single load to multiple branch circuits? Man I hope this thread gets locked soon.. I just can't seem to control myself even though I know better! |
Mike Butler (media) wrote on Mon, 06 August 2007 23:24 | ||
It's easy, Lee! Evan and I have already done it. See that "ignore all messages by this user" over on the right side? Right below "add to buddy list" (which I'm sure you don't want to do, even though he calls everyone his buddy ) Just like magic! |
chris haywood wrote on Tue, 07 August 2007 00:31 |
I bet you would complain that Einstein couldnt comb his hair or tie his shoes too, all while overlooking great technical ideas but these are advanced, so I understand your confusion and recommend an attempt be made to further yourself, no need to bask in technical illiteracy.. |
David Buckley wrote on Mon, 06 August 2007 23:27 | ||
A qualified electrically educated individual wouldn't do this as its is a multiple NEC violation, and an unqualified electrically educated individual wouldn't do it as it has a number of obvious risks that make it dangerous. |
E. Lee Dickinson wrote on Tue, 07 August 2007 00:16 |
Man I hope this thread gets locked soon.. I just can't seem to control myself even though I know better! |
chris haywood wrote on Tue, 07 August 2007 00:41 |
I already stated that if you are scared, then this is not for you... and if you think it is dangerous, then it is dangerous... |
E. Lee Dickinson wrote on Mon, 06 August 2007 23:37 | ||
"People who claim themselves to be misunderstood geniuses are rarely either." Wiring up a receptacle with two plugs is your idea of 'advanced?' In which 4000 level course did they teach this at The School of Gud Spelling and Wirng? |
Eric Simna wrote on Mon, 06 August 2007 23:44 | ||
I hope more than just a lock happens. Although Mac has already said he would let it ride. Chris, you have failed to provide repeated requests for proof of YOUR education, YOUR qualifications. Why not instead of picking apart other people's qualifications, put up or shut up. Now I am calling for it now. What are YOUR qualifications. I am not adding anything to the argument of the safety of this "device" you propose because I would never trust anything of that sort with my life, let alone anyone else's. You have stated that people are in interpreting your words incorrectly. That is EXACTLY why people do not give electrical advice over the internet. Do you want to be the one responsible for one moron saying "Chris Heywood said it would work" and kills himself attempting to implement this monster? I spent 45 minutes reading. I had to add my 2 cents. |
E. Lee Dickinson wrote on Mon, 06 August 2007 23:49 | ||
And if you don't think it's dangerous, then it isn't. Your stop sign example is... about on par with the rest of your examples. No one ever t-boned a car they knew was coming or plowed into a pedestrian they knew was there. I've gotten ticketed for running a stop sign as I bet many of us have. I very calmly and politely explained to the judge that I was able to see clearly in all directions, and made an informed decision that it was safe to proceed: "Son, that's not your decision to make." |
chris haywood wrote on Tue, 07 August 2007 00:58 |
I will put up, but just a little more time first, as we can see, no one has been able to prove me wrong, doesnt that alone speak anything? I also laid out the qualifications to attempt such a concept... so if someone knows whats going on, they will say, why didnt i think of that, and if they dont, then they shouldnt try it at all... |
chris haywood wrote on Tue, 07 August 2007 01:12 |
but son, that is your decision to make, are you made for the stop sign or is the stop sign made for you.... |
Quote: |
you missed many important points in the posts of simple warnings... |
Quote: |
there is danger everywhere, its up to the individuals own discretion on how to deal with day to day dangers, |
Brad Weber wrote on Tue, 07 August 2007 11:38 |
...copies of his posts to the relevant authorities certainly might put a stop to such nonsense... |
Scott Smith wrote on Tue, 07 August 2007 11:31 | ||
ARE YOU FOR REAL?? |
chris haywood wrote on Tue, 07 August 2007 13:12 |
The level of safety is directly proportional to the level of knowledge obtained for the particular task at hand... (typically 'professionals' already know this) |
chris haywood wrote on Tue, 07 August 2007 13:12 |
Am I really having to explain such fundamental principals to highly educated professional individuals? |
Brad Weber wrote on Tue, 07 August 2007 11:38 |
I'd love to let it go Mac, but electrical systems are serious business and treating them in anything less than a serious manner, much less giving unqualified advice, is dangerous. Does anybody know if Chris is a registered Electrical PE or licensed Electrician and where he lives? Some complaints for practicing without a license and representing one's self as a qualified expert in electrical systems or copies of his posts to the relevant authorities certainly might put a stop to such nonsense. Not trying to be a jerk, but unfortunately some people apparently have to learn the hard way. |
James Lawford wrote on Tue, 07 August 2007 14:01 |
So would you say that you never speed in your car? You have obtained the knowledge (hopefully) that speeding can be dangerous and illegal. This doesn't stop many people doing so and killing many people a day worldwide. |
Quote: |
(How on earth do I quote on this forum?!) |
Evan Kirkendall wrote on Tue, 07 August 2007 16:31 |
STOP FEEDING THIS THREAD!!!! |
Dave Barto wrote on Tue, 07 August 2007 13:27 | ||||
I am sorry for having to pipe in but this is the only time I will, I am sick of hearing this. I haven't put Chris on ignore yet because I am still waiting to hear a good explination of why he is quailifyed. I am not a qualifyed electrician, nor will I ever be. I admit this. But I do know the reasoning behind why this adaptor will and will not work. I have also been shocked with 220 and it really hurt, and I am lucky nothing worse happened. After that, I have always hired someone who is qualifyed and can show me proof of it to do my electrical work.
No, you don't have to explain this to us. But as of 2 minutes ago there was 16114 registered users. Quite a few (I am guessing the majority) don't have much experience with power. So if one of them happens to read your post and then kills himself with an illegally made adaptor, whose fault is it? Just my 2 cents. |
Jason Lavoie wrote on Tue, 07 August 2007 07:45 |
I just have to say that IF you ARE as electrically knowledgeable and experienced as you claim to be, then scrounging up a few feet of cable and wiring in a temporary (properly sized) outlet should be faster, easier, and cheaper than doing what you're proposing.. without having to go into what is safe or legal. 9 times out of 10, the easiest way also turns out to be the safest. Jason |
Quote: |
If Ruger makes a gun, and it is used to kill someone, who's fault is it? The gun manufacturer? |
Eric Simna wrote on Tue, 07 August 2007 00:13 | ||
Talk means NOTHING. If someone comes up to you in street clothes and tells you "I'm a cop, you have the right to remain silent..." are you going to believe him before he shows his badge? Is the theory sound? I can't say yes or no. Is it safe to be using when there are other variables around (aka, other people), HELL NO. Please stop giving advice that if followed is VERY POSSIBLY A KILLER. My guess, you are a punk 18yr old who has been doing this in his high school theatre for 4 years and thinks he can run laps around the big dogs. When you get maced for being too rambunctious I hope you cry for a long time. Am I a big dog? Nope, far from it. But I do know when to show the respect they deserve. You apparently need to learn that. Also, since you don't have it listed in your profile. How old are you? And where are you located? It would be a great bit of information for all of us on the LAB that want to make sure our gigs are not compromised by your unsafe practice. |
Quote: |
Perhaps you could enlighten me with a picture or photo of your device so I can understand it fully. What I have understood so far just sounds downright dangerous. Now if I'm someone who knows what they are doing, imagine the crazy ideas that you are putting into the heads of people that don't. Please explain it throughly and properly and safely, or don't explain it at all. |
Joe Larsen wrote on Tue, 07 August 2007 01:01 |
The context is different, but the principle is the same. http://www.penny-arcade.com/images/2004/20040319l.jpg |
Mark Dawson wrote on Tue, 07 August 2007 04:46 |
So I've been watching this thread and posting the odd comment. All the educated, experienced and mature posters on this forum have all given the same answer. Nice work guys, as every good point has been raised. Lets all do a show together sometime it would be a very cruisy day. |
Scott Smith wrote on Tue, 07 August 2007 06:41 |
Do you still hear a "gnat" buzzing around here? You know what they say about arguing with a fool.. |
Bob Dore wrote on Tue, 07 August 2007 08:09 |
This thread is unbelievable. It has to be a (not very funny) joke. Is this for real? Bob. |