ProSoundWeb Community

Sound Reinforcement - Forums for Live Sound Professionals - Your Displayed Name Must Be Your Real Full Name To Post In The Live Sound Forums => AC Power and Grounding => Topic started by: Frank DeWitt on January 03, 2019, 02:15:19 PM

Title: 46 VAC on the case
Post by: Frank DeWitt on January 03, 2019, 02:15:19 PM
I have three 3000 series Audio-Technica receivers. They receive there power from wall warts. Each one has 46 volts AC on the case until a audio cable is connected.

I have checked and the voltage is coming from the wall wart.  Unplug the wall wart and the voltage goes away.  Plug the wall wart into the wall and not into the receiver and I measure 46 VAC to ground from the low voltage plug from the wall wart.

Clearly there is no power there because connecting the sound system pulls it down to zero but the voltage can be felt with the receiver in one hand and the sound system connector in the other.

BTW I checked.  The sound system is grounded.  Pin 1 is grounded. and the shell of the line level input cables 1/4 in TRS are grounded to building and power ground.  There is clearly no issue with the sound system. all the fault is with all three wall warts.

Is this normal?  How do I stop it? 

Thanks.
Title: Re: 46 VAC on the case
Post by: Daniel Levi on January 03, 2019, 02:55:58 PM
Probably normal if it's a switching supply with no earth connection.
In these PSU's there are/is a capacitor(s) between the primary and secondary side that are there to reduce RFI, most modern un-grounded equipment has the same problem, this will generally be ~half mains voltage but at very low amps so whilst it doesn't feel to good it's not actually dangerous.
Some equipment is worse than other though, although better quality equipment is actually more likely to exhibit this effect due to it being more likely to be RFI/EMC compliant.
I couldn't use my previous laptop connected to my grounded projector with it's genuine ungrounded supply plugged in as the   
Title: Re: 46 VAC on the case
Post by: John Roberts {JR} on January 03, 2019, 02:58:02 PM
Is it a problem?

If it goes away from audio connections it is likely stray leakage voltage with very little current.

Relax...  2 pin wall warts "should" be double insulated (check for UL marking).

JR
Title: Re: 46 VAC on the case
Post by: Mike Sokol on January 03, 2019, 06:52:49 PM
Is it a problem?

If it goes away from audio connections it is likely stray leakage voltage with very little current.

Relax...  2 pin wall warts "should" be double insulated (check for UL marking).

JR

JR is right. All wall warts without a ground pin will have a certain amount of leakage, creating a hot-skin/stray-voltage around 1/2 of line potential but with way less than 1ma of fault current. For example, your iPhone will typically have between 40 and 80 volts on its body while the charger is plugged in, depending on plug orientation in the receptacle. And it’s not dangerous since the current is below perception levels. However, if the double insulation fails in the charger or wall-wart fails, then the wall wart can pass significant current into the chassis. So don’t go cheap on your wall warts, and never use a damaged wall wart or charger. And don’t talk on your phone while it’s plugged into an outlet charger and you’re in the bathtub. While electrocutions from wall-wart failures are pretty rare, that's likely because most of the time your body isn't sitting in a tub of nicely grounded water.
Title: Re: 46 VAC on the case
Post by: Frank Koenig on January 04, 2019, 03:41:49 PM
All good guidance above. I'll add that lowering the input resistance of the meter from (typically) 10 M Ohms to something like 10 k Ohms will make the readings far less frightening -- unless there really is a leakage problem. It's surprising to me that more meters don't have a "low-Z" mode for making these kinds of AC line measurements. -F
Title: Re: 46 VAC on the case
Post by: Frank DeWitt on January 04, 2019, 04:55:55 PM
All good guidance above. I'll add that lowering the input resistance of the meter from (typically) 10 M Ohms to something like 10 k Ohms will make the readings far less frightening -- unless there really is a leakage problem. It's surprising to me that more meters don't have a "low-Z" mode for making these kinds of AC line measurements. -F

I will go back and measure the current.  This one is a bit different. I found it because a tech complained of getting a shock

When I serviced Fire alarms I carried a 25 watt light bulb in a socket with pigtails so I could load the meter and get rid of the phantom reading.
Title: Re: 46 VAC on the case
Post by: Frank Koenig on January 04, 2019, 05:21:25 PM
When I serviced Fire alarms I carried a 25 watt light bulb in a socket with pigtails so I could load the meter and get rid of the phantom reading.

Indeed, an incandescent lamp with clips is a powerful instrument in the right hands :) I still optimistically carry the 12 V version in my cars, although I admit that figuring out all but the simplest problem in these modern CANBus monsters is pretty unlikely. -F
Title: Re: 46 VAC on the case
Post by: Scott Helmke on January 08, 2019, 10:18:29 AM
Assuming it's just a parasitic voltage with very little current available, it can still cause *audio* problems if there's a long mic cable run to the mixer. I had that happen in an installation once - the parasitic voltage from the switching PSU was being carried away through the shield of the mic line to the mixer, which was maybe 100 feet away from the wireless rack.  I ended up grounding the receiver to the rack (had to scrape away some paint on the rails) to fix the problem.
Title: Re: 46 VAC on the case
Post by: TJ (Tom) Cornish on January 08, 2019, 10:28:50 AM
All good guidance above. I'll add that lowering the input resistance of the meter from (typically) 10 M Ohms to something like 10 k Ohms will make the readings far less frightening -- unless there really is a leakage problem. It's surprising to me that more meters don't have a "low-Z" mode for making these kinds of AC line measurements. -F
You need a Fluke 117 (https://www.fluke.com/en-us/product/electrical-testing/digital-multimeters/fluke-117).
Title: Re: 46 VAC on the case
Post by: Frank Koenig on January 08, 2019, 11:25:56 AM
You need a Fluke 117 (https://www.fluke.com/en-us/product/electrical-testing/digital-multimeters/fluke-117).

You enabler you!!!
Title: Re: 46 VAC on the case
Post by: John Roberts {JR} on January 08, 2019, 11:32:55 AM
I've felt as low as 25V from a leaky outlet strip protection device, before I grounded my kitchen outlet. It didn't feel like a shock, just felt like "something" wrong.

Be careful using current mode on VOM if it is a real low impedance voltage the VOM fuse can pop.

It is surprising that semi-pro (not pro) gear works as well as it does.

JR
Title: Re: 46 VAC on the case
Post by: Frank DeWitt on January 08, 2019, 12:42:58 PM
You need a Fluke 117 (https://www.fluke.com/en-us/product/electrical-testing/digital-multimeters/fluke-117).

I am using a Fluke 23  (Similar to a 77) I will check the current this week.
Title: Re: 46 VAC on the case
Post by: John Roberts {JR} on January 08, 2019, 12:51:52 PM
I am using a Fluke 23  (Similar to a 77) I will check the current this week.
Perhaps measure voltage drop across something like a 1k resistor before sacrificing a meter fuse.

JR
Title: Re: 46 VAC on the case
Post by: Mike Sokol on January 08, 2019, 03:47:33 PM
You enabler you!!!

Well if TJ says buy a Fluke, I need to buy one. All Glory to the Hypnotoad!
Title: Re: 46 VAC on the case
Post by: TJ (Tom) Cornish on January 08, 2019, 04:56:35 PM
Well if TJ says buy a Fluke, I need to buy one. All Glory to the Hypnotoad!
I've been recommending the 117 for the last 10 years or so, but I don't actually own one myself.  I have a Fluke 289 which is my meter with Lo-Z functionality, but one of these days I need to take my own advice and get a 117 for the road.  Right now I'm using a 177 which is a nice meter, however it doesn't have Lo-Z or the built-in NCVT.  One of these days I'll talk myself into another meter.  :)

On a very unrelated note, my most recent application for using my Flukes was to figure out how much voltage/current the solenoid winding system on my 1924 Seth Thomas Self-Winding #1 clock takes (Answer - 4ish volts at about 0.7A).  I overhauled the movement and replaced the lantern batteries that originally powered the clock with a wall wart.  It's now my shop clock.

Title: Re: 46 VAC on the case
Post by: TJ (Tom) Cornish on January 08, 2019, 04:57:11 PM
I've been recommending the 117 for the last 10 years or so, but I don't actually own one myself.  I have a Fluke 289 which is my meter with Lo-Z functionality, but one of these days I need to take my own advice and get a 117 for the road.  Right now I'm using a 177 which is a nice meter, however it doesn't have Lo-Z or the built-in NCVT.  One of these days I'll talk myself into another meter.  :)

On a very unrelated note, my most recent application for using my Flukes was to figure out how much voltage/current the solenoid winding system on my 1924 Seth Thomas Self-Winding #1 clock takes (Answer - 4ish volts at about 0.7A).  I overhauled the movement and replaced the lantern batteries that originally powered the clock with a wall wart.  It's now my shop clock.
Here's the clock in operation.
Title: Re: 46 VAC on the case
Post by: Frank DeWitt on January 08, 2019, 05:39:04 PM
In the days of analog meters you could tell if you had phantom voltage by watching the way the needle moved when you first connected it.  This was my clew to either check t with a light bulb or just short it.

For a long time I confirmed with the light bulb.  After I became confident that I was interpreting the needle movement correctly I stooped testing with the light bulb and just shorted it to ground.
Title: Re: 46 VAC on the case
Post by: Frank DeWitt on January 08, 2019, 07:26:15 PM
I will go back and measure the current.  This one is a bit different. I found it because a tech complained of getting a shock

.45 ma
Title: Re: 46 VAC on the case
Post by: John Roberts {JR} on January 08, 2019, 08:18:58 PM
.45 ma
You can feel less than that, but it is orders of magnitude less that what could cause muscular contraction and further injury. 

JR