Bogdan P. wrote on Thu, 08 July 2004 23:24 |
Looks real bad. Eminence people should take a look at it. I feel like something was wrong, maybe not setup, could be just a bad impulse from the amp... Good luck PS: I am just finishing number 5&6 this week |
Al Limberg wrote on Fri, 09 July 2004 18:40 |
It strikes me as rather simplistic to blame the speaker manufacturer when you load a speaker in a box it wasn't designed for (or vice versa). I too have lost a total of 2 Lab 12s over the last 2 years (out of 16). One was inspected by Eminence and determined to be a factory defect (voice coil shorted at the point where it crosses from one side to the other as it's a dual layer v.c.) and the other questioned as perhaps over-powered but still replaced under warranty. I have, since the second occurence, made it my own policy to check the tightness of all module lid screws prior to each gig and also to now replace the lid caulking-sealant each spring and fall. The combination of the energy created by the cab itself and the constant riding in a truck are enough to let machine screws come loose. Loose screws and caulk trying to maintain a seal against the cone motion of the Lab is a battle that takes constant attention. Al p.s. I have also raised the HPF on my DSP to 35Hz/24db/Oct when using less than 4 in a block. |
Shane Gosling wrote on Fri, 09 July 2004 06:29 |
Interesting Pics, I had 4x Kappa Pro in peavey DTH concert subs (we got the cabs unloaded) years ago all the edges cracked around the cone one by one. I put it down to not being able to withstand coming out the van in cold weather then being powered up. I also thought at first it was over excursion but we only put 1000w a side to them and nothing under 40hz with steep roll-of. To Be honest i never thought of eminence being all that reliable, but that was prob due to what happened with the concert subs. Have you guys considered what a lab sub would sound like if JBL/RCF etc were to make the special driver? My thoughts it would be tighter and more reliable? Thanks |
Oz wrote on Fri, 09 July 2004 09:01 |
Is Eminence stepping in here?? OZ |
TimmyP wrote on Mon, 12 July 2004 00:39 |
It seems to me that: If the flex leads can be broken owing to over excusrion, it's a design flaw. If the voice coil former can be damaged owing to hitting the back plate, it's a design flaw. If the cone or surround can be damaged owing to the strength of the drive motor, it's a design flaw. |
TimmyP wrote on Mon, 12 July 2004 00:39 |
The only thing that should ever be capable of damage in a properly designed loudspeaker is the voice coil, owing to being driven beyond it's power rating. |
Brad Litz wrote on Wed, 14 July 2004 13:50 |
I think most high spl users want to push the drivers past the one way linear travel (Xmax) 13mm to the two way max displacement (Xmech) of 44mm on peaks. |
Centauri wrote on Wed, 14 July 2004 06:53 | ||
I thought one of the original design parameters of the LasSub was to achieve the highest quality sound from a DIY box, and operating outside Xmax isn't really doing anything for quality of sound. If I want higher spl, I add more boxes..... Cheers |