Triple-J wrote on Sun, 10 October 2004 00:53 |
Excellent post Brad. One could point to a certain canadian power trio who were up to 100+ inputs a couple of years ago...we all know where that road went too. Should I mark that channel "high heat" or "fluff dry"? |
Triple-J wrote on Sun, 10 October 2004 06:53 |
Excellent post Brad. One could point to a certain canadian power trio who were up to 100+ inputs a couple of years ago...we all know where that road went too. Should I mark that channel "high heat" or "fluff dry"? |
AlanH wrote on Sun, 10 October 2004 09:37 | ||
I wonder how many mics are used in that one church... the Temple of Syrinx? |
Andy Peters wrote on Sun, 10 October 2004 19:59 | ||||
Obviously, 112 channels are well beyond the reach of The Working Man... -a |
JR wrote on Sun, 10 October 2004 17:51 |
I recall one church that gave every member of the choir individual hand held mics. They had to stack up two 36 input consoles, but they were very pleased with the sound they got. Can you say proximity effect? There may be a hybrid approach where hand-helds are selectively given to the baritone singers. JR |
Scott Fahy wrote on Sat, 09 October 2004 16:56 |
One of the things I tell people is to stand in front of the choir and see how they sound acoustically then place the mics accordingly |