ProSoundWeb Community

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 2 [3]  All   Go Down

Author Topic: QSC Amp Choice  (Read 6279 times)

Ryan Garnett

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 536
Re: QSC Amp Choice
« Reply #20 on: January 13, 2008, 04:16:25 pm »

Stupid idea...PL340
Logged

Walter Wright

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 313
Re: QSC Amp Choice
« Reply #21 on: January 13, 2008, 06:02:52 pm »

sure, what the hell, itech 6000s for everybody! what about the original question?
Logged
Professional Guitar Repair Tech,
Semi-professional Sound Guy

Bob Leonard

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4669
Re: QSC Amp Choice
« Reply #22 on: January 13, 2008, 09:39:18 pm »

Walter Wright wrote on Sun, 13 January 2008 18:02

sure, what the hell, itech 6000s for everybody! what about the original question?

The answer is they have almost identical specs. and the 4050 is still in production. I am in favor of the 4050 over the PL4.0, own 4050s, have no problems and sleep better knowing I have 6 years of warranty to cover any problems and a $100 rebate for every one I bought. The rest is up to you.
Logged
The roar of the grease paint, the smell of the crowd.

Walter Wright

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 313
Re: QSC Amp Choice
« Reply #23 on: January 13, 2008, 11:50:05 pm »

please excuse any perceived crabbiness in my last post. i'm just genuinely interested in the specific answer because i recently acquired an older pl4, and want to know how it compares, especially for sub duty. no doubt owning new with a warranty is a fine thing, and psw has certainly opened my eyes to the respect that the rmx amps get as reliable bang-for-buck winners.

is this just rehashing a worn-out heavy iron vs. switcher debate?
Logged
Professional Guitar Repair Tech,
Semi-professional Sound Guy
Pages: 1 2 [3]  All   Go Up
 

Page created in 0.046 seconds with 19 queries.