ProSoundWeb Community

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 [2]  All   Go Down

Author Topic: The Whirlwind AES Qbox  (Read 16919 times)

Andy Peters

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 9104
    • http://www.latke.net/
Re: The Whirlwind AES Qbox...Update from Comic Con
« Reply #10 on: July 28, 2007, 04:10:21 pm »

Ken Freeman wrote on Sat, 28 July 2007 10:48

Okay, the first show was kind of a bust.  Turns out that I can?t drive 500 feet of AES down an analog snake and expect it to work.


Ah, yeah.  You should be able to go 500' or more no sweat with proper 110-ohm cable.

-a
Logged
"This isn't some upside down inverted Socratic method where you throw out your best guess answers and I correct your work." -- JR


"On the Internet, nobody can hear you mix a band."

Ken Freeman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2119
Re: The Whirlwind AES Qbox...Update from Comic Con
« Reply #11 on: July 28, 2007, 05:15:00 pm »

Andy Peters wrote on Sat, 28 July 2007 13:10

Ken Freeman wrote on Sat, 28 July 2007 10:48

Okay, the first show was kind of a bust.  Turns out that I can?t drive 500 feet of AES down an analog snake and expect it to work.


Ah, yeah.  You should be able to go 500' or more no sweat with proper 110-ohm cable.

-a


I knew that I was pushing it...when we started the project, I had my delay amp racks at FOH and all of about 25 feet away....Then they sort of moved after the pre-rig team ran all the speaker cables to the backstage area.  It was worth a shot, but it sure was handy to find out from the AES Qbox that there was no Sync.

Ken
Logged

Ken Freeman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2119
Re: The Whirlwind AES Qbox...Audio Purists From Hell convention
« Reply #12 on: July 28, 2007, 10:10:05 pm »

Michael 'Bink' Knowles wrote on Sat, 28 July 2007 12:13


At least it's not the Audio Purists From Hell convention.  Laughing


That show is early next year.  I'll have to see if you are available to come down for that one.

Ken
Logged

Michael 'Bink' Knowles

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4279
    • http://www.binkster.net/index.shtml
Re: The Whirlwind AES Qbox...Audio Purists From Hell convention
« Reply #13 on: July 29, 2007, 01:55:16 am »

Ken Freeman wrote on Sat, 28 July 2007 19:10

Michael 'Bink' Knowles wrote on Sat, 28 July 2007 12:13


At least it's not the Audio Purists From Hell convention.  Laughing


That show is early next year.  I'll have to see if you are available to come down for that one.

Ken



Ouch! If you're game, I'm game.   Shocked  

-Bink
Logged
Michael 'Bink' Knowles
www.binkster.net

Ken Freeman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2119
Re: The Whirlwind AES Qbox
« Reply #14 on: August 13, 2007, 08:13:11 pm »

So, a few weeks later after running up a few more thousand miles on the soon to be useless frequent flyer programs, we are back in the shop for some serious shop tests with the AES Q-Box.  I had one of the PM-5D’s fired up for an upcoming show and thought I would pass a few bits through it and see how it behaves.  As you can see, it spits out the bit rate info.  Here is how I set it up for the run through.  I have put some labels on things that are hidden around the side of the device or ones that can mess you up.  The channel switch is my new favorite because there is no digital cross talk.  You can run one side into full clip and the second is very quiet...until you flip the switch and the headphones try to jump off your skull....Ouch.

index.php/fa/10770/0/

Ken

Edit: Grammer
Logged

Ken Freeman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2119
Re: The Whirlwind AES Qbox
« Reply #15 on: August 15, 2007, 05:24:09 pm »

Here we are aqain  I switched the output from the 5D from 96K to 48K.  The screen is a little fuzzy...might be the operator and too much Pete's Coffee this afternoon, but the AES Qbox grabbed it right away as noted by the 48K light on the top of the picture.

The AES Qbox would be pretty handy as a tool to see if maybe the A-1 is asleep at the wheel and might not have the configured the console correctly when it comes to directly interfacing outboard gear using AES I/O.  Never had that happen?  Yeah...

Ken

index.php/fa/10820/0/
Logged

Ken Freeman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2119
Re: The Whirlwind AES Qbox: Next stop.
« Reply #16 on: August 28, 2007, 10:57:58 pm »

Next stop for the AES Qbox on tour is Boston.  I have a large industrial project with some big wig talent and a mix of DigiCo, Yamaha and Meyer Digital hardware.

Ken

Logged

Ken Freeman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2119
Re: The Whirlwind AES Qbox: Skipping this stop.
« Reply #17 on: October 15, 2007, 12:52:45 am »

Yep,

A show for AARP in Boston.  A good sized one at that.  Talent included Tony Bennett, Earth Wind and Fire and the incomparable Rod Stewart.  My plans for an all digital drive fell apart when one of the acts insisted upon a PA that only had analog inputs.   Digital Cue box back into the work box...

More later.

Ken
Logged

Nicolas Lowman

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 276
Re: The Whirlwind AES Qbox: Skipping this stop.
« Reply #18 on: December 20, 2008, 02:19:20 pm »

Hi Ken,

I have enjoyed your thoughts on the AES qbox. I was looking at one when they first came out as we were playing with some digital drive. I haven't been doing much in the way of digital interface lately, however I figure the day will come fairly soon when I am. When the day comes I reckon I will be burning the credit card for this very cool toy. A comment on the itech AES input on the Crown Itech amps, the ones that I have used will read 96K on their input, however they will only pass 48K out the loop out. If memory serves me correctly we would only daisy chain like four at a time. In order to feed more amps the signal would hit a DA as soon as it got to the stage.

How does the headphone output sound on the Qbox? Is it very high quality or is it kind of a utility just to be able to hear what is on the line.
How about the onboard speaker? Is it pretty good or similar to the analog Qbox?

Another digital question I have is, how can you tell if you are on the very edge of being a stable signal. Would you have to put the signal on an Oscope? I mean you said it wouldn't lock on a analog cable at 500 feet. What happens if you plugged it in at 300 feet and it locked but it was on the verge of barely working? If it sounded fine on the qbox and through the PA, then I would think it would be fine. I wouldn't want to run the PA on a digital drive without knowing that that it is a very solid lock. If you put the signal on a scope, could you see a square clock signal and be able to see rounded edges when the signal gets a little shaky? This would be useful information to be able to check wordclock cable integrity as well. I haven't had to put a monitor and foh console on the same wordclock yet, but I figure the day is coming. I would definitely want to be able to make sure that I had a good solid clock on that.

Does anybody know of a good book or reference on AES and wordclock distribution? Much as I hate to admit these things are going to affect us all. There are many questions that it would be good to the know the answer to like.
Do you ever need to terminate an AES connection?
How far can you send an AES signal on 110 ohm cable? 500' 1000'?
How far can it reliably travel down an analog snake?
I have also heard that some AES devices output will better than others?
There are similar questions for the wordclock. Imagine if you had FOH and MON both slaved to a masterclock, if that clock isn't completely stable it could nuke everything. It is a very frightening thought. I could see a show with a digital console on both ends of the snake being synced along with a Protools playback system that is interfaced via AES as well. It may not be common right now but we will face it. Whoever it teching something like that in a touring situation better have his stuff together for sure.

Sorry if this got a little off the topic of the Whirlwind device, guess I tangent a lot. If I should post this in the main forum instead I can.

Nicolas

Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  All   Go Up
 

Page created in 0.034 seconds with 22 queries.