I was searching for info on another sub on the eaw site when i noticed they have a new basshorn in development. They got a preliminary pdf up there so i had a read...
This new sub is almost same dimensions, (and i'm guessing similar internal structure) to their BH822e/KF940 design (which I've heard nothing but bad things about in actual use). Old sub 52x36x32, new sub 42x36x32.
Seems they've started to quote sensitivity figures at frequencies lower than 100+hz these days, they quote 105dB sensitivity for 4x stack at 50hz (as well as 110dB at 160hz).
These will probably be almost twice the weight (guess based on old subs weight) and almost twice the size of Danley TH-115's yet the danleys can produce equal or greater spls almost half an octave lower.
Before I go on I have great respect for most of EAW's stuff but subs is one area I'm not sure they do great anymore. I have heard and liked the SB1000 subs, not so keen on the LA128(?) sound.
I've not heard the LA400 so won't comment but where are the "middle of the road" subs, can we not have reasonable extension without huge sizes anymore?
All the horn loaded stuff is either massive or lacks any real extension. Surely if EAW wants to continue to have customers you use all EAW, especially the bigger touring systems, they will want to have subwoofers that will keep up in coming years in terms of size weight and output?
Maybe I'm jumping the gun a little (lot) here, or picking on EAW especially but isn't the company worried that people might start buying their line arrays etc and then using someone else subs for best performance...