ProSoundWeb Community

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Xilica 3060 or Ashly 36/3.24cl Thoughts ??  (Read 5954 times)

Dean Wells

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 27
Xilica 3060 or Ashly 36/3.24cl Thoughts ??
« on: February 19, 2011, 03:31:39 PM »

Hello all.. hope this finds you well..

need a reasonable 3/6 processor.
going in circles and ending up between these 2
stand alone mobile project so no other compatibility issues etc.
street price points seem to be $1100/$700 respectively ..
any thoughts?.. is one more intuitive, service/support etc..

Thanks..
Logged
____________________________________________

Miller capacitance in bipolar output devices was a vector for distortion from high PS edge rates.  :)

RaySoly

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 220
  • Retired IATSE 56 MONTREAL
Re: Xilica 3060 or Ashly 36/3.24cl Thoughts ??
« Reply #1 on: February 19, 2011, 07:09:55 PM »

Although I owned xta, bss  and TC processors, the Ashly seems a good deal for the money....it features a usb port for pc control and programming and the controls section is clearly labelled on the front panel....... would make it a more "user friendly "processor in my opinion.....but can't go wrong with either......


Ray
Logged

Jim Duyck

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1
Re: Xilica 3060 or Ashly 36/3.24cl Thoughts ??
« Reply #2 on: February 20, 2011, 12:28:09 PM »

I have a rig with the the Ashley 3.6SP in it.  I absolutely love it.  I've also found the editing software very easy to use.  It makes for a great cost-effective LR+Subs setup with a little MixWiz & QSC K-Series boxes.
Logged
~jim~

Tim McCulloch

  • SR Forums
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 24029
  • Wichita, Kansas USA
Re: Xilica 3060 or Ashly 36/3.24cl Thoughts ??
« Reply #3 on: February 20, 2011, 01:05:02 PM »

My only complaint with Xilica is that getting purchase info is next to impossible, and support only exists when you contact them.  I hear they're very responsive (a Good Thing), but if support is needed after hours it would be nice to have web resources.

Ashly is stellar in support and dealer network.  For those reasons alone I'd pick Ashly.

Have fun, good luck.

Tim Mc
Logged
"If you're passing on your way, from Palm Springs to L.A., Give a wave to good ol' Dave, Say hello to progress and goodbye to the Moonlight Motor Inn." - Steve Spurgin, Moonlight Motor Inn

Lee Buckalew

  • Classic LAB
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1385
  • St. Louis, MO area
    • Pro Sound Advice, Inc.
Re: Xilica 3060 or Ashly 36/3.24cl Thoughts ??
« Reply #4 on: February 21, 2011, 06:51:18 AM »

Xilica is good enough that Danley uses them as their OEM processor manufacturer.
That said, I use the Xilica's as my go to low price DSP.  I've had one with out of the box problems and it was replaced ASAP with no questions.  Programming is quite simple via USB, I have not used the network connection on them.

Lee Buckalew
Pro Sound Advice, Inc.
Logged
Lee Buckalew
Pro Sound Advice, Inc.

John Halliburton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 868
  • Still has hair and white pointy beard...
Re: Xilica 3060 or Ashly 36/3.24cl Thoughts ??
« Reply #5 on: February 21, 2011, 10:21:15 AM »

Although I owned xta, bss  and TC processors, the Ashly seems a good deal for the money....it features a usb port for pc control and programming and the controls section is clearly labelled on the front panel....... would make it a more "user friendly "processor in my opinion.....but can't go wrong with either......


Ray

Remember though, the 3.24cl doesn't have a port on it, rs232 or usb.  You must buy the newer 3.6sp version.  The 4.24c does have an rs232 port only, the 4.8sp has both.

Best regards,

John(has a Protea 4.24c and loves it).
Logged

ProSoundWeb Community

Re: Xilica 3060 or Ashly 36/3.24cl Thoughts ??
« Reply #5 on: February 21, 2011, 10:21:15 AM »


Pages: [1]   Go Up
 



Site Hosted By Ashdown Technologies, Inc.

Page created in 0.026 seconds with 19 queries.