misterbassman wrote on Mon, 23 August 2004 17:33 |
hi everyone,
I have a Pair of Mach 154 speakers. I was just wondering how much difference it would make if I was too run them bi-amped instead of full range as they are at the moment. Im just wondering if it is going to be worth be carrying an extra amplifier around with me.
Any thoughts/views would be great.
Dan
|
My answer to this typical question has changed somewhat over the years due to the improvements in passive crossovers in the better speaker systems. Not knowing anything about Mach 154 speakers I can't say where those fit into the equation. I'm particularly talking of Mid/Hi boxes here and well made cabs.
I agree that with a processor and biamping that the spkr can reach its max potential. OTOH, the operator comes into play here as well. If the operator doesn't have the proper knowledge (or equip) to setup a more complex system then any gains will be thrown out the window.
System interconnection will now be more complex so less idiot proof. More options are now available to the operator so that means more areas for subjective thinking and wrong decisions (plus mistakes and accidents). More cables and equip are now needed. The passive crossovers can be built to tailor the sound for that specific model cab, something a basic active crossover won't be able to do. While a digital processor WILL have the ability to mimic these tweaks the operator must know and be able to implement them.
So, as a general rule I say "If you have to ask then you are probably better off using the passive mode".
CAVEAT: Assuming the spkr systems are well built and designed in the first place. Of course if they are not then even getting them to work at their max is not going to match up with a better system anyway. A sow ear won't make a silk purse.
-AlanH