ProSoundWeb Community

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10   Go Down

Author Topic: Battery-electric Road Vehicles and Energy Infrastructure  (Read 8863 times)

Frank Koenig

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1324
  • Palo Alto, CA USA
Battery-electric Road Vehicles and Energy Infrastructure
« on: June 03, 2021, 05:42:18 PM »

Maybe it's time to move it down here. Or maybe it's done. Anyway. Electric vehicles (EVs) have their plusses and minuses -- like everything else. Here's a short, and by no means complete, list from my point of view, mostly obvious but maybe a few less so.

Plusses:

Higher efficiency measured from the vehicle energy input point. This is due to the relatively high efficiency of Li storage batteries, switching power electronics and electric motors. Regeneration during braking helps further. Pure EVs with large batteries are better able to take advantage of regen. Essentially zero consumption when stopped.

Excellent driving experience. No reciprocating parts makes for low vibration and noise, especially when stopped or at low speeds. Instantaneous power control (both positive and negative) allows for a high level of driving precision and smoothness. Fast acceleration occurs without drama or excessive wear (except for tires) or even much extra energy consumption. The increase from rapid starts is mostly due to the longer time spent in cruise with the resulting higher aerodynamic loss.

No warm-up required and cold shutdowns do not cause damage. Great for those of us who need to reposition vehicles now and then or make short trips.

No reduction in performance with altitude.

Lower direct operating cost in the current market. (My daily driver costs ~ $.04 / mi for electricity -- about the same per-mile cost as tires).

Lower maintenance and the potential for lower lifetime cost as batteries become cheaper. We're just about there for high-utilization operators whose mission profile fits.

Home or shop/depot charging eliminates trips to the gas station. Charging time is essentially zero for intermittently utilized vehicles that sit by a charger when not in use.

Easy and efficient integration into an electric energy-infrastructure. More below.

Minuses:

Range comes at a high cost in purchase-price and weight.

Charging is slow, which is an issue for cross county travel or other high utilization. Mitigated to some extent with larger batteries and high-power chargers. (A larger battery can absorb charge more rapidly adding more miles per minute of charge.) With current batteries the last 20% of charge is much slower so a driving schedule that allows charging to 80% saves a lot of time. Current EVs can charge from 20% to 80% in roughly 30 minutes given a powerful enough charger. Advances in this area are likely.

Many apartment dwellers, and others without private, electrified parking, must rely on inconvenient (and often expensive) public chargers.

Low ambient temperature reduces battery capacity and winter driving consumes more emery reducing range. Partially mitigated by thermal management of the battery, such as charging up to the moment of departure to warm the battery.

Extended high power operation, such as racing on a track, can exceed the battery's thermal limit. This has been mitigated in race-oriented cars through thermal management.

High weight that does not go down as fuel is burned. This compromises handling while being partially mitigated by placing the battery down low. Not too much of a concern outside of serious motorsports though there are knock-on effects such as tire and road wear.

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Toward an Electric Energy Infrastructure

As we face an ever more diverse range of energy sources (some of which may not yet have been discovered or developed) we need an infrastructure that can efficiently combine and distribute their energy. Electricity has some advantages:

It is highly fungible. Thanks to power electronics, it is easy and relatively cheap to convert any format (Voltage, frequency, phase) into another. Varying sources such as solar and wind are easy to accommodate.

Electrical machines usually achieve 80% - 90% efficiency at converting in and out of mechanical energy. This is better than combustion engines or current schemes for electrolyzing water into Hydrogen.

Electricity is relatively cheap and safe to transport (PG&E's current problems not withstanding  >:( ). DC transmission lines are efficient for long distances where their lower loss offsets rectifier/inverter losses.

So far there is no intercontinental transmission of electric power, but it is not out of the question. This could be quite useful for large-scale leveling of intermittent sources, such as solar.

The elephant-in-the-room minus is storage, both for utility scale load-leveling, which is especially important for intermittent sources, and for vehicles, including air vehicles, that can't be on a cord. Rail transport and the like (hyperloop) distinctly do not belong to this class. Our great hope, for now, is battery technology, which is advancing nicely. Clearly, wider use of batteries will require extracting raw materials and efficient reuse of those materials is required for this to be at all sustainable. This is where I believe we should be directing our efforts.

I've been an EV queen for quite a while. The stable consists of a 2000 Easy Go golf car (to be converted to Li when the current Pb-acids go TU), a 2015 Tesla S 85 D (6 years and going strong), and a 2020 Sur Ron Light Bee electric dirt bike (2 kWh of pure fun).

--Frank
Logged
"Nature abhors a vacuum tube." -- John Pierce, Bell Labs

Brian Jojade

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3414
    • HappyMac Digital Electronics
Re: Battery-electric Road Vehicles and Energy Infrastructure
« Reply #1 on: June 03, 2021, 06:05:53 PM »

All great points.

Looking far into the future, the concept of an internal combustion engine is very archaic.  It's a great stopgap for now, but the excessive complexity just doesn't make a lot of sense.  Some people are just beholden to the idea of the engine and don't want to give that idea up.  They like the idea of pressing the gas to rev the engine and make noise. Can't really do that with the electrics.

From a performance standpoint, anyone that has driven a performance electric vehicle will quickly say that it certainly can easily keep up with the gas counterparts.  Even the low end electrics are quite responsive machines.

Interestingly enough, electric cars have been made since the early 1800's.  Limited battery technology of the time and easy access to oil meant development went into gas engines instead, leaving electric cars all but forgotten.  But, in the last 100 years, we've just about maximized efficiency that we can realistically get out of gas engines.  Improvements year over year are now very small. Any increase in performance or efficiency comes at a very high increase in cost. So much so that it's not practical to make much more advancement.

The need for batteries in portable devices such as laptops and phones has massively improved upon the storage density and reliability of batteries. This naturally has been expanded now into the electric vehicles we are seeing on the market as well.  This technology is still quite young and there is a lot yet to learn.  100 years from now, we will likely have alternative ways to store electricity, or even generate electricity from.  Someday, we may be able to pull out an old banana peel and a half full can of beer and drop it into Mr. Fusion and be on our way.

Logged
Brian Jojade

Caleb Dueck

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1713
  • Sierra Vista, AZ
Re: Battery-electric Road Vehicles and Energy Infrastructure
« Reply #2 on: June 03, 2021, 08:00:15 PM »

Many great points, for sure.

Also agree that battery tech is a (the?) key bottleneck.  For example, periodic sources of electricity, like solar, are limited by battery tech.  It's sunny outside today at my house, the power just blipped off for a half second while the computer UPS kicked in.  If the cost/capacity of batteries was significantly better so nearly every home had some sort of in-wall battery solution - then the question could shift to, "Why not buy some solar panels?" or some other way of generating intermittent power. 

If all homes were built with whatever size in-wall batteries - even a plug-in exercise bike would make sense to own!
Logged
Experience is something you get right after you need it.

Tim Halligan

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 381
Re: Battery-electric Road Vehicles and Energy Infrastructure
« Reply #3 on: June 03, 2021, 08:26:47 PM »

The current fossil-fuelled vehicle paradigm is one that we all know very well: you pull up next to the pump, fill your tank, pay the cashier, then drive off with the capacity for however many kilometres of travel before needing to repeat the process. The whole refuelling procedure takes 5 minutes...10 tops.

Until EV's can deliver that kind of charging paradigm they will be a non-starter in many people's minds.

Hydrogen fuel cell equipped vehicles - whilst still a relatively new product - allow us to continue with the paradigm we are all familiar with, and as such may change a few minds along the way.

Cheers,
Tim
Logged
An analogue brain in a digital world.

Matthias McCready

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 571
Re: Battery-electric Road Vehicles and Energy Infrastructure
« Reply #4 on: June 03, 2021, 08:45:03 PM »

Many great points, for sure.

Also agree that battery tech is a (the?) key bottleneck.  For example, periodic sources of electricity, like solar, are limited by battery tech.  It's sunny outside today at my house, the power just blipped off for a half second while the computer UPS kicked in.  If the cost/capacity of batteries was significantly better so nearly every home had some sort of in-wall battery solution - then the question could shift to, "Why not buy some solar panels?" or some other way of generating intermittent power. 

If all homes were built with whatever size in-wall batteries - even a plug-in exercise bike would make sense to own!

Check out Pumped-storage hydroelectricity :-)

The gist is that a body of water can become a giant battery. When there is excess power (ie solar during the day) water is pumped up into the holding area. When energy is needed it flows out through generators. The whole process is somewhere around 90% efficient I believe.
Logged
Measure twice, and cut once; this is especially important if you are a mohel.

Russell Ault

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2513
  • Edmonton, AB
Re: Battery-electric Road Vehicles and Energy Infrastructure
« Reply #5 on: June 03, 2021, 09:43:38 PM »

The current fossil-fuelled vehicle paradigm is one that we all know very well: you pull up next to the pump, fill your tank, pay the cashier, then drive off with the capacity for however many kilometres of travel before needing to repeat the process. The whole refuelling procedure takes 5 minutes...10 tops.

Until EV's can deliver that kind of charging paradigm they will be a non-starter in many people's minds.

Hydrogen fuel cell equipped vehicles - whilst still a relatively new product - allow us to continue with the paradigm we are all familiar with, and as such may change a few minds along the way.

Ultimately I would guess that, as has happened so many times before, economics is what will encourage people to accept the end of the old refuelling paradigm. Faster charging is always more expensive (and that includes hydrogen fuel cell technology, which has been around for nearly two centuries in some form or other but has never managed to overcome the difficulties of storing and transporting pure hydrogen—a substance that makes gasoline look like water); there are applications where that expense can be worth it, but for most people it probably isn't (and people will do almost anything to save a little money). Besides, for a lot of people (particularly in places where single-family housing is the norm) the old paradigm is significantly less convenient than what overnight home charging offers.

Of course, this all assumes that individual car ownership will continue to be the norm. Driving is already one of the most expensive ways to get from point A to point B (especially once externalities like roadway capacity and parking are factored in), and I wonder at what point that cost becomes higher than people are willing to bear.

Check out Pumped-storage hydroelectricity :-)  {...}

This has real potential for utility-scale storage (although it's only viable in places that aren't already running out of land and/or water), but unfortunately doesn't address the storage-in-transit problem.

One of the biggest selling points of fossil fuels (and petroleum in particular) is their ability to store a phenomenal amount of energy in a package that is a trifecta of small, light-weight, and stable. Nothing we've come up with comes close to achieving more than one or two of these properties (and, frustratingly, the closer we seem to get on the density/specific energy front the further we get from stability, as evidenced by the number of electronics products over the last few years that have been recalled for spontaneously combusting). This is why electric airplanes are such a challenge (and why research is being done to find economical ways to take captured CO2 and turn it back into jet fuel...although if you think the US has electricity distribution problems now, just remember that, in 2019, replacing jet fuel joule-for-joule with electricity would have consumed something like a quarter of all the electricity produced in the whole country).

-Russ
Logged

Bob Faulkner

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1502
  • Raleigh, NC
Re: Battery-electric Road Vehicles and Energy Infrastructure
« Reply #6 on: June 03, 2021, 09:45:53 PM »

I'm not a battery expert, but have come across a couple of things.

Until the battery industry can fix the "memory" related issues with batteries, I'm still opting for the internal combustion engine.  However, I think capacitors are a much better option for energy storage and would consider an EV if it used capacitors (vs. Li-Ion).  Some dash-cams use capacitors.

Regarding slow charging of EV batteries, this is exactly what they need to ensure a full charge.  Fast-charging of batteries is convenient, but it reduces the capacity of the battery over a "not to long" time (think cell phone).
Logged

John Roberts {JR}

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 17183
  • Hickory, Mississippi, USA
    • Resotune
Re: Battery-electric Road Vehicles and Energy Infrastructure
« Reply #7 on: June 03, 2021, 09:50:55 PM »

This is actually a mature discussion... I think Nicolas Tesla (the real Tesla) had the right idea with wireless transmission of electricity (I don't think he perfected that). My more pedestrian alternative is conductive tires and roads so cars can lose the heavy batteries and suck power from the roadways as needed. I understand in some EU cities they are experimenting with induction coils buried under the roadway to charge up vehicle batteries but they are focusing on public transportation (buses).

I am old so this is academic to me... I continue to be impressed by the energy in a few ounces of gasoline used by my chain saw to make sawdust. We are crazy to not use fossil fuels while they are so cheap and so plentiful. We are also ignorant to not pursue newer generation nuclear power technology.

I hear that my local power utility is tearing down the clean (cough) coal power plant they built at great expense, and we rate payers are still on the hook for the bill. The federal government thought it was a great idea (thanks). My utility will continue making electricity with NG.

JR
Logged
Cancel the "cancel culture". Do not participate in mob hatred.

Russell Ault

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2513
  • Edmonton, AB
Re: Battery-electric Road Vehicles and Energy Infrastructure
« Reply #8 on: June 03, 2021, 10:24:06 PM »

{...} Until the battery industry can fix the "memory" related issues with batteries, I'm still opting for the internal combustion engine. {...}

One of the major selling-points of Li-ion battery chemistry is that it doesn't suffer from a memory effect. Of course Li-ion batteries degrade over time, but keeping them charged near the middle of their capacity drastically slows this process.

{...} However, I think capacitors are a much better option for energy storage and would consider an EV if it used capacitors (vs. Li-Ion). {...}

It's certainly an appealing idea, and I'm sure research is being done in this area, but at present the most advanced supercapacitors on the market have less than 1/10th the specific energy of a Li-ion battery.

This is actually a mature discussion... I think Nicolas Tesla (the real Tesla) had the right idea with wireless transmission of electricity (I don't think he perfected that). My more pedestrian alternative is conductive tires and roads so cars can lose the heavy batteries and suck power from the roadways as needed. I understand in some EU cities they are experimenting with induction coils buried under the roadway to charge up vehicle batteries but they are focusing on public transportation (buses). {...}

I think the big challenge here is that transmitting lots of electricity (whether wirelessly or wired) is hard to do safely if there are people nearby. Obviously rail-based modes of transportation have it easier in this regard, but I'll be interested to see how those in-road induction coils work out.

-Russ
Logged

Jeff Bankston

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2568
Re: Battery-electric Road Vehicles and Energy Infrastructure
« Reply #9 on: June 03, 2021, 11:19:15 PM »

great for going to and from a stage at a large concert
Logged

ProSoundWeb Community

Re: Battery-electric Road Vehicles and Energy Infrastructure
« Reply #9 on: June 03, 2021, 11:19:15 PM »


Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10   Go Up
 



Site Hosted By Ashdown Technologies, Inc.

Page created in 0.039 seconds with 22 queries.