Sound Reinforcement - Forums for Live Sound Professionals - Your Displayed Name Must Be Your Real Full Name To Post In The Live Sound Forums > Wireless and Communications

Corona safety for 1 wireless mic, many users application

(1/5) > >>

Loren Miller:
TLDR: Will this work in a live setting that is properly implemented? Shure Mx202 with R189 mini-shotgun capsule into QLXD body pack. On a stand pointed 5' high to an X on the floor that is 3' away?

Context: Corporate Q&A, Wedding Toasts/Speeches, normally a Wireless HH is passed around or on a stand, that won't work now.

So I am horrified and also excited that Ohio is opening up, I want to do this as safely as possible not only for me, but for guests. I've thought about Disposable Mic covers, but guests still hold the mic, or breathe on it if using a stand and it looks weird.

Thought about using my Senn 416 Shotgun, but I've never used it in a live setting and it is an expensive mic to have boomed up with people around.

Then I thought about using a choir mic, I've begrudgingly used those much more than I've wanted to on live stages with monitors at 11 and it worked.

Looked at the Mx202 and it has a TA4 which fits snugly on my QLXD body pack, and it is a metal pack so it should ground it. They also have a new Mini-Shotgun capsule (r189) that might get me some more distance. The Idea is to have this pointed at a dedicated spot that is clearly marked so anyone who needs to can step on the gaffe-tape X and proceed to talk way longer than needed.

Anyone used this combination before?
Other than Feedback and possibly heavy EQ, what are the potential downfalls?
How are you going to implement safe Mic technique in the future?


Keith Broughton:
Even with a shotgun mic, people talking 3' away with a live sound system is going to be a challenge.
At least a static position will allow you to EQ for best GBF but still...tricky.
How do you stop people from stepping up and getting close to the mic?
The 416 would be a great option but. as you say, a lot of $$ around people drinking!

Tim McCulloch:
The virus doesn't jump off the mic/windscreen.  If people don't touch the mic with their hands, lips, tongue, eyes, or nasal cavities they are much less likely to be infected via the microphone itself.

A much bigger issue is the crowd itself, and the proximity of those giving the toasts, speeches, etc to each other, their relative level of ability to follow instructions (inebriation factor), and to practice distancing and appropriate hygiene.

You can 'insist' that clients use safe techniques, but what are YOU going to do when they don't?  If you want clients, you'll keep your mouth shut and let them infect each other like sailors on shore leave sharing a hooker.  IF you tell them no, they'll dispute the bill, refuse to pay, reverse a credit card charge, or just make you look bad on social media.  After I give the client my "edumacational speech", if they want to disregard it - I'm not the health dept.  They can screw themselves and their families and friends all they want.  My mics will go in a zip bag for sanitizing upon return to the shop.

It's your duty of care to supply them with mics cleaned prior to load in, and proper instructions; it's not your duty to risk your own health or safety by attempting to enforce rules when faced with BrideZilla or MoBZ (Mother of BrideZilla), an angry groom or best man or irate guests.

George Friedman-Jimenez:
True, viruses don't jump, they are not even alive. But speaking loudly to be heard, even without coughing, can easily generate droplets that travel more than 3 feet and can land on the mic. If there is one asymptomatic infectious person among those who speak at the event, anyone who inadvertently touches the mic with their hand after that person and does not disinfect their hand immediately afterwards will be at risk of infection.
If there is no coronavirus around the entire state or county, this won't happen, but weddings and regional/national corporate events by nature attract folks from out of town, with unknown exposures and infection avoidance behavior, who may have traveled by air or other public transit from higher risk areas days earlier. No one is going to screen guests at the door. This is not just a trivial problem as we figure out how to return safely to producing live group events.

So here is a technical question. Is there a simple way for each person who speaks to use his or her own smart phone with bluetooth as their own personal mic to connect to the PA, each on a separate mixer channel?

brian maddox:

--- Quote from: George Friedman-Jimenez on May 22, 2020, 06:09:48 pm ---.....

So here is a technical question. Is there a simple way for each person who speaks to use his or her own smart phone with bluetooth as their own personal mic to connect to the PA, each on a separate mixer channel?

--- End quote ---

I just had the worst tingling down my spine as i realized that if you thought of this, someone else will and i will inevitably be asked to do this in the future.

Thankfully, the answer to this is a hard NO for several reasons.  Most basic is that Bluetooth is a two device handshake protocol, so the only way to get sound out of a bluetooth device would be for them to each pair their bluetooth headset to YOUR device that was then plugged into your mixing console.  There are such devices, but they ain't cheap, and you'd be the one footing the bill.  Also, Bluetooth is designed to be a short distance protocol and as such is not reliable more than a few feet away.

But wait there's more.  The latency that is inherent in Bluetooth would be a significant issue.

Lastly, i don't even want to imagine what it would be like to have to try to make a dozen different bluetooth headsets on a dozen different people sound anything even approaching not terrible.


[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

Go to full version