The boss liked the X40 so much that we sold off our dozen-or-so UPA's and replaced them with X40/X42. I'm totally good with that decision.
Yeah, 52 lbs and a built in pole mount, beats the hell out of my 75 lbs and none (upa-1p's)...... and all the new rigging options are just (expensive) gravy !
Heard the X-40 at infocomm. Had good luck comparing to what I'm familiar with, because Meyer used one of my go-to test tracks in their (superb) demo.
Excellent sound.... ........ it, the Danley Studio One and a couple of Alcon models, rang my bell.
Swinging back to thread title.....if I were looking at X-40 vs a similar Danley, i think it would be the SM-96 at 73 lbs...certainly not the SH-69....
I think the coverage angle of a straight walled horn doesn't narrow as much with increasing frequency as with curved wall horns,
so polars are worth delving into imo ....that is, after the smell test, or should i say HEARING test is completed
I'd like to see the horn walls of the X-40 without the grille on.