ProSoundWeb Community

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Pages: [1] 2  All   Go Down

Author Topic: ULXD4Q, cascading 3 units  (Read 629 times)

Brian Adams

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 422
    • Adams Production Services
ULXD4Q, cascading 3 units
« on: November 06, 2019, 09:37:37 am »

I normally use a UA844 to distribute my antennas, but I have a rental going out this week (local high school theatre), and I need to squeeze 3 receivers into a 4 space rack. This means I'll have just enough room in there for either a Furman or a distro, but not both. I'd like to have the Furman in the rack to manage the power and keep things looking clean, but this would mean I'd have to cascade all 3 ULXD units. I know this is theoretically possible, and people have done it, but I've never cascaded more than the recommended 2 units. What are the real-world negative implications of cascading 3 units, and are the disadvantages great enough that I should avoid doing this?
Logged
Brian Adams
Adams Production Services
Vermillion, SD
adamsproductionservices.com

Scott Helmke

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1455
Re: ULXD4Q, cascading 3 units
« Reply #1 on: November 06, 2019, 09:53:48 am »

Are they all the same frequency band?  Generally the cascade outs are band-limited.
Logged

Brian Adams

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 422
    • Adams Production Services
Re: ULXD4Q, cascading 3 units
« Reply #2 on: November 06, 2019, 10:24:08 am »

Are they all the same frequency band?  Generally the cascade outs are band-limited.

Yes, all of my ULXD is G50 band.
Logged
Brian Adams
Adams Production Services
Vermillion, SD
adamsproductionservices.com

Aram Piligian

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 87
Re: ULXD4Q, cascading 3 units
« Reply #3 on: November 06, 2019, 12:19:07 pm »

I haven't noticed any significant ill effects in real-world use. If I were in a tough RF environment I might think twice, but for average uses with good antenna placement and SNR it seems fine.
Logged

Brian Adams

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 422
    • Adams Production Services
Re: ULXD4Q, cascading 3 units
« Reply #4 on: November 06, 2019, 02:26:36 pm »

I haven't noticed any significant ill effects in real-world use. If I were in a tough RF environment I might think twice, but for average uses with good antenna placement and SNR it seems fine.

Thank you, Aram. This is exactly what I wanted to hear. I'd say this is an average environment, but I'll definitely be cautious in more challenging spaces. Thanks again!
Logged
Brian Adams
Adams Production Services
Vermillion, SD
adamsproductionservices.com

Luke Geis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1965
    • Owner of Endever Music Production's
Re: ULXD4Q, cascading 3 units
« Reply #5 on: November 07, 2019, 09:04:08 am »

The literature says 2 units, but it also says you can do more if you don't mind potential issues.

Per Shure's website:

Note: The RF cascade ports continue to operate if more than two units are cascaded.  However, the issue is RF signal degradation (IMD and RF noise)that will occur each time the signal passes through an RF cascade circuit.  At some point, the RF signal will become too distorted/corrupted to be useful.  Thus, Shure recommends the conservative approach to cascade only two units.  No damage will occur if more than two units are connected in cascade. 
Logged
I don't understand how you can't hear yourself

Bob Charest

  • Lab Lounge
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 815
  • Westbrook ME, USA
    • Bob Charest Band
Re: ULXD4Q, cascading 3 units
« Reply #6 on: November 07, 2019, 09:32:21 am »

I need to squeeze 3 receivers into a 4 space rack...
Hi Brian,

We used to have 12 channels of ULXD as well. We cascaded the 1st two into one set of the front-mounted 1/2 wave antennas and let the 3rd unit use its own set.

On the smaller stages that we would play on (24'-36' x 12'-16') wee had excellent coverage just using the front-mounted 1/2 wave antennas.

Best regards,
Bob Charest
Logged

Scott Helmke

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1455
Re: ULXD4Q, cascading 3 units
« Reply #7 on: November 07, 2019, 10:38:41 am »

If you really want to squeeze out as much performance as possible, cascade the A and B antenna chains differently.

Something like antenna A starts in receiver 1, then 2, then 3, but antenna B starts in receiver 3, then 2, then 1.
Logged

Keith Broughton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3232
  • Toronto
Re: ULXD4Q, cascading 3 units
« Reply #8 on: November 07, 2019, 11:50:22 am »

I spoke with a Shure tech a while back, and he said a cascade of 3 is workable.
One suggestion I read was to use the middle frequencies on the 3rd unit, rather than ones at the high and low end.
Logged
I don't care enough to be apathetic

Jason Glass

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 703
    • CleanWirelessAudio.com
Re: ULXD4Q, cascading 3 units
« Reply #9 on: November 07, 2019, 03:09:18 pm »

If you really want to squeeze out as much performance as possible, cascade the A and B antenna chains differently.

Something like antenna A starts in receiver 1, then 2, then 3, but antenna B starts in receiver 3, then 2, then 1.

An excellent tip!

ProSoundWeb Community

Re: ULXD4Q, cascading 3 units
« Reply #9 on: November 07, 2019, 03:09:18 pm »


Pages: [1] 2  All   Go Up
 



Page created in 0.057 seconds with 22 queries.