ProSoundWeb Community

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Acoustic Shadowing: Unpacking Wave Numbers (k) & Introducing Wave Ratio Thesis  (Read 606 times)

M. Erik Matlock

  • Global Moderator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 456
  • Senior Editor Live Sound International/ProSoundWeb
    • M. Erik Matlock on PSW

Acoustic Shadowing: Unpacking Wave Numbers (k) & Introducing The Wave Ratio Thesis
If youíre truly interested in learning about sound propagation and architectural acoustics, itís something you should be acquainted with, at least casually.
By Michael Fay ē September 9, 2019


OK, I get it. This topic may be too esoteric for many, but if youíre truly interested in learning all you can about sound propagation and architectural acoustics, itís something you should be acquainted with, at least casually.

Iím going to give you the final answer right up front. Itís either: A: 11.00Ē, B: 0.84Ē, C: 7.50Ē, or D: none of the above.

The question: When dealing with obstructions, which of these physical dimensions does not present meaningful acoustic shadowing in the upper speech range of audio? The answer is B: 0.84Ē.

But why, and how is this information unpacked and calculated?

Continue reading here: https://www.prosoundweb.com/channels/study_hall/acoustic-shadowing-unpacking-wave-numbers-k-introducing-the-wave-ratio-thesis/
Logged
Train the next generation. Success without a successor is ultimately failure. wywu.org
Pages: [1]   Go Up
 

Page created in 0.018 seconds with 15 queries.