ProSoundWeb Community

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Pages: 1 [2]  All   Go Down

Author Topic: B&C 14" coax for wedges ?  (Read 1508 times)

Uwe Riemer2

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 26
Re: B&C 14" coax for wedges ?
« Reply #10 on: February 13, 2019, 01:45:21 pm »

That was a part of what prompted me to ask if anyone had experience with these coaxes.  The fact that they are depending on the cone surface as a waveguide extension for the HF is not encouraging.

Well, Danley uses a 12" cousin and we all heard, how capable this box is.

I cannot tell you something about this specific driver, but I have designed a wedge with the 14CXN76.
My box is good, as long as I dont need serious ( 3x 4x12" Marshall on stage ) kick and snare out of it.

So if you want to wait a year or so, I am pretty sure, that I will have an opinion about the 14CXN88
Logged

Riley Casey

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1284
Re: B&C 14" coax for wedges ?
« Reply #11 on: February 13, 2019, 07:52:56 pm »

Only way to find out is to rattle Bennettís cage.  No retail links coming up.  Makes me think itís not getting a lot of traction.

Frank Koenig

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 671
Re: B&C 14" coax for wedges ?
« Reply #12 on: February 13, 2019, 09:01:38 pm »

The fact that they are depending on the cone surface as a waveguide extension for the HF is not encouraging.

Riley, I'm not sure where you're getting that. I'm not a driver designer but I have built systems around three modern coaxes, two of which have rigid horns that extend beyond the woofer dust cap and one where the horn melds into the woofer cone, as is the case with this diver and the similar one that Danley uses in the much celebrated (here at least) SM80. I've also looked at a lot of published response curves. My observation is that the coaxes with protruding horns have less overlap between the passbands and are generally more challenging to design crossovers for.

I presume the extended horn can get you a narrower pattern at the highest frequencies and perhaps a bit more efficiency. But given that newer B&C (as well as other) HF compression drivers can get stupid loud and sound pretty good doing it, horn efficiency sufficient to keep up with a single 12 to 15 in. cone driver is not likely an issue. (The SH96 uses a single B&C Ti diaphragm driver in a conical horn crossed at ~1kHz to keep up with 4 15 in. woofers, for example.) To be sure, these coax speakers are used in applications where precise, wideband pattern control is not required.

Way back in the day I believe Urie built a studio monitor around the Altec 604 coax. They ended up cutting holes in the walls of the HF horn to get it to work. I've got a paper on it somewhere that I can dig up if anyone is interested.

Something I've wondered about is whether using the woofer cone as part of the HF horn results in any funny sort of frequency/phase modulation distortion as the horn walls move a significant fraction of a wavelength when the woofer is working at high level. It appears not to be a problem in practice but I'd be interested to hear any observations on this.

I'll be looking at this driver when I next get the speaker building bug.

--Frank
Logged
Yes, it is a giant stereo system!

Uwe Riemer2

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 26
Re: B&C 14" coax for wedges ?
« Reply #13 on: February 14, 2019, 03:42:23 am »

...  No retail links coming up.  Makes me think itís not getting a lot of traction.
That is easy to explain:
The price of the 88 is 30% more than the 76, which puts it beyond the wallet of most DIY folks,
there are not many like Peter Morris.
And then you will need an amp to exploit the low/mid capabilities , for me that means 44M10, Delta 100DSP, PLM12K44
also not exactly cheap

Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  All   Go Up
 


Page created in 0.06 seconds with 19 queries.