Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[Seth Albaum]

 

I'm donating services (in kind) for a fashion show co-hosted by my local chamber of commerce. I want to put my best sound forward.

I was recently sent a youtube vid for a zumba track (blech). Anyway, it's a particular remix and a clean version of a song. It's just low rez.

I searched for legal avenues to obtain a better sounding copy. None that I can find.
Sketchy and questionably-legal youtube to mp3 converters are not a good idea.
Playing youtube live from wifi is not a good idea.

My rule is that mp3's need to be 320mpbs, and that's minimum. But, there's a lot of junk out there that's been upsampled and ripped, I'm afraid. When I tell clients I need "better quality" tracks in cases where they're supplying (usually dance groups), it doesn't go well. So, I usually take care of it, myself.

What do you do in these situations? I know most customers think their low bit rate files sound fine, but what they have for playback isn't the same...

[Milt Hathaway]

You give the customer what they want.

[Seth Albaum]

You give the customer what they want.

That's the easy answer and often the best. I cringe at the sound quality, though. There's the "customer," and then there's the potential customers in the room who may agree with me that it sounds like crap.

I'm looking to market my business, also. Also, zumba and dance troops are the worst when it comes to supplying tracks, and I've done quite a bit of work with them. Seriously, what they give me hurts my ears, and it's often stuff I can't get on my own.

[Lance Hallmark]

In doing event work, sometimes using lower quality audio sources is necessary. You can try to contact the person who uploaded the specific track and see if they have a higher quality version. If there was a commercial release of this at some point check sites like Discogs for an original source as well as overseas sites, record pools, Beatport, etc... If you have to use a rip, you can run it through a processing program like Platinum Notes to clean it up a bit. I try not to use anything like that but one wedding couple wanted a specific acapella  version of Bruno Mars' Marry Me, which was done by two non-famous/non-commercial performers - You Tube was the only place it was ever available.
Always inform the client that you prefer not to use questionable sources, as the lower quality is even more noticeable when being played at higher volumes through a professional P.A. so that they understand the quality drop may be very noticeable and they are OK with that. What specific song are you looking for?

[Robert Piascik]

I understand your frustration and agree with you but you have two choices: use what they give you or find something better, legally or illegally. If it were me I wouldn't sweat it much either way. I wouldn't have any qualms about trying to obtain illegal version that is higher quality, and/or, your room full of potential clients are presumably other dance troops either don't know or don't care about the quality of their tracks either.  If you are pleasant and easy to work with and give them what they want (even though it may sound horrible to you) I think that's going to go further towards getting you new business.

[Johannes Halvorsen]

What?!? Seven hours and no lecture on licensing? This place is going to the dogs.

[Seth Albaum]

What?!? Seven hours and no lecture on licensing? This place is going to the dogs.

I found other remixes of this track, but not the particular one the customer wants. It could very well be that this remix isn't "licensed" and that's why. It's a zumba group that is going to perform before the start of a fundraising fashion show. Zumba is infiltrating everything!! 

[Lyle Williams]

I had to do streaming to someone's phone, bluetoothed to a tiny speaker, wireless mic'd to the mixer recently.  (Handheld mic pointing at bluetooth speaker)

This was to deliver on a requirement that hadn't been mentioned prior to the day.

It really surprised me.  It didn't sound bad.

[Ray Aberle]

Zumba's business model is as such-
- They 'register' Zumba instructors (for a fee)
- They charge their instructors a monthly subscription fee
- Zumba provides the instructors with "approved" music monthly
- Zumba (the corporation) handles the music licensing for public play, and share that approval with their instructors through that monthly subscription fee

This all being said- the Zumba group should (if they are official, Zumba- licensed) have legal permission for their music to be played with their performance, and they should be able to contact the Zumba corporation to get this music track for playback at their event. If Zumba no longer offers that track, you should ask them to consider choosing another song. But, since they are Zumba-licensed, I BELIEVE you can live stream the YouTube video legally. (But, we're professionals, and that's not something we'd like to ever to. )

-Ray

[Kevin McDonough]

I understand your frustration and agree with you but you have two choices: use what they give you or find something better, legally or illegally. If it were me I wouldn't sweat it much either way. I wouldn't have any qualms about trying to obtain illegal version that is higher quality, and/or, your room full of potential clients are presumably other dance troops either don't know or don't care about the quality of their tracks either.  If you are pleasant and easy to work with and give them what they want (even though it may sound horrible to you) I think that's going to go further towards getting you new business.

hey

yeah second this. I do a lot of similar work and always try and find better quality tracks or versions if I have notice in advance. Half the time it's just something they've heard on youtube and there isn't better quality available, and the other half it's just them turning up with a CD, or these days a phone, and expecting you to play it there and then, so no chance to even look.

Dance troupes in particular are notorious for having both bad sounding copies, and tracks that are made up of a few different snippets edited together in the worst possible way, with terrible cuts and transitions between the songs.

But the funny thing is that's what they like, and when I edit things together with much better transitions, they actually don't like it as much and prefer the rubbish ones. As always, 'better' is a subjective term.

Just smile and explain it wont sound the greatest ever as it's not a brilliant copy of the track, but you'll do your best. Then play it and mess with the EQ as best you can, try and make it passable. Most people wont notice the difference and are more focused on their little girl or boy dancing/singing anyway.

k

[ProSoundWeb Community]