ProSoundWeb Community

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Pages: 1 2 [All]   Go Down

Author Topic: A view from the Rx  (Read 3563 times)

Brad Harris

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 119
A view from the Rx
« on: May 11, 2016, 01:20:36 pm »

Sometimes you will see or hear mention of "Always look from the standpoint of the receiver" in regards to antenna and downstream devices.


Here is a quick example of why.




This is taken during a show. The first one from the LPDA antenna grid feeding a few racks of Rx, the other, a Dipole in the same physical location (just 16" lower in height) as the grid antenna.






BRad
Logged

Nathan Riddle

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1776
  • Niceville, FL
    • Nailed Productions
Re: A view from the Rx
« Reply #1 on: May 11, 2016, 03:51:30 pm »

Hey Brad,

Could you help me understand more about your images. I'll admit I know little about RF (just what my EE classes taught me, basics), but I'd like to know more.

Are each of the single line peaks (looks like impulse, but because of scale of your chart is really just a narrow width wireless system freq) a wireless system being used?

Are you trying to document/explain that 'looking' at what the Rx antenna gear receives is a good idea so that you can 'see' extra noise. Rather than looking at whatever test equipment you have 'sees'

Thanks,
Nathan
Logged
I'm just a guy trying to do the next right thing.

This business is for people with too much energy for desk jobs and too much brain for labor jobs. - Scott Helmke

Mac Kerr

  • Old enough to know better
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6600
  • Audio Plumber
Re: A view from the Rx
« Reply #2 on: May 11, 2016, 07:45:18 pm »

Hey Brad,

Could you help me understand more about your images. I'll admit I know little about RF (just what my EE classes taught me, basics), but I'd like to know more.

Are each of the single line peaks (looks like impulse, but because of scale of your chart is really just a narrow width wireless system freq) a wireless system being used?

Are you trying to document/explain that 'looking' at what the Rx antenna gear receives is a good idea so that you can 'see' extra noise. Rather than looking at whatever test equipment you have 'sees'

The quieter scan shows how much spurious RF the LPDA (Paddle) antenna rejects compared to a simple whip.

Mac
Logged

Kevin Graf

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 308
Re: A view from the Rx
« Reply #3 on: May 12, 2016, 07:28:26 am »

Is it a half wave dipole or a quarter wave whip?
Logged
Speedskater

Brad Harris

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 119
Re: A view from the Rx
« Reply #4 on: May 12, 2016, 09:00:14 am »

Here is another scan I did this morning to hopefully clear up the image a bit




This Dipole is not a whip antenna (like you would normally find on the front/back of a receiver), rather a wide band omni antenna (in this case a Shure UA860SWB). Most RF manufacturers make a similar antenna (Sennheiser, Telex, etc).


The lower noise floor is from the LPDA which is a directional antenna, whereas the higher noise floor is from the omni antenna. What this signifies, is always look at RF from the receivers point of view (i.e., the antenna that your receiver systems is using whenever possible).


Some exceptions are IFB/IEM as most are 'built in' and can't be 'tapped into', where you would require a separate antenna to monitor what is happening in the spectrum at that position.




BRad
Logged

Kevin Graf

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 308
Re: A view from the Rx
« Reply #5 on: May 12, 2016, 12:57:14 pm »

A dipole is far from an omni antenna. Viewed from the ends, it has a null.

******************
That's a real nice frequency read-out.
« Last Edit: May 12, 2016, 01:01:18 pm by Kevin Graf »
Logged
Speedskater

Brad Harris

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 119
Re: A view from the Rx
« Reply #6 on: May 12, 2016, 01:09:56 pm »

A dipole is far from an omni antenna. Viewed from the ends, it has a null.


Yes, if one wasn't talking about antennas. What you are talking about is a theoretical Isotropic antenna.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Omnidirectional_antenna


BRad
Logged

Dan Currie

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 75
Re: A view from the Rx
« Reply #7 on: August 04, 2016, 10:45:13 am »

Really cool stuff!!  What kind of attenuator did you use to protect the scanner from the high level signal of the distribution amplifier?


Sometimes you will see or hear mention of "Always look from the standpoint of the receiver" in regards to antenna and downstream devices.


Here is a quick example of why.




This is taken during a show. The first one from the LPDA antenna grid feeding a few racks of Rx, the other, a Dipole in the same physical location (just 16" lower in height) as the grid antenna.






BRad
Logged

Brian J Holder

  • Classic LAB
  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8
Re: A view from the Rx
« Reply #8 on: August 04, 2016, 11:45:40 am »

Brad
I know that curiosity killed the cat, but what device did you capture the images from?
Brian
Logged

Karl Winkler

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 139
    • Lectrosonics
Re: A view from the Rx
« Reply #9 on: August 10, 2016, 10:54:17 am »

Sometimes you will see or hear mention of "Always look from the standpoint of the receiver" in regards to antenna and downstream devices.

Interesting images, Brad, and a good illustration of what you are talking about.

Another reason to "see the world from the receiver's perspective" is that receivers, active splitters, active antennas, etc. will all generate intermods where a simple antenna into an analyzer will not. So, in effect, you can see something opposite than your images show, specifically more IM frequencies.

When compared to analyzers, wireless mic receivers are more sensitive but generally not real time and not as wide band. So of course both tools have their place.
Logged
In theory, theory and practice should be the same. In practice, they are not.

Samuel Rees

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1879
  • Washington, D.C.
Re: A view from the Rx
« Reply #10 on: August 10, 2016, 12:05:52 pm »

I mostly replicated this experiment at a gig during some downtime yesterday. Very interesting. Thanks for posting!
Logged

Keith Broughton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3163
  • Toronto
Re: A view from the Rx
« Reply #11 on: August 10, 2016, 01:37:55 pm »



Another reason to "see the world from the receiver's perspective" is that receivers, active splitters, active antennas, etc. will all generate intermods where a simple antenna into an analyzer will not. So, in effect, you can see something opposite than your images show, specifically more IM frequencies.


Whenever possible, I connect my analyser to the antenna splitter output.
Logged
I don't care enough to be apathetic

Lyle Williams

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1556
Re: A view from the Rx
« Reply #12 on: August 10, 2016, 04:55:11 pm »

Most receivers have more sensitivity than you need.  It's all about signal to noise.
Logged

Brad Harris

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 119
Re: A view from the Rx
« Reply #13 on: October 02, 2016, 11:32:51 pm »


Been very busy in the trenches lately ....
Really cool stuff!!  What kind of attenuator did you use to protect the scanner from the high level signal of the distribution amplifier?

None, there usually is a small level gain with UA84x units, but not enough to warrant padding the inputs.

BradI know that curiosity killed the cat, but what device did you capture the images from?Brian

RF Venue Vantage (Mac) with a RFExplorer unit.




BRad
Logged

ProSoundWeb Community

Re: A view from the Rx
« Reply #13 on: October 02, 2016, 11:32:51 pm »


Pages: 1 2 [All]   Go Up
 



Page created in 0.068 seconds with 23 queries.