ProSoundWeb Community

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: TTI PSA settings  (Read 2671 times)

alex.cerutti

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 26
TTI PSA settings
« on: December 20, 2015, 06:15:41 AM »

Hi all, I am trying to find the best settings for getting the most detailed results from the TTI PSA scanners.
Can any one help?

cheers
Logged

John Sulek

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 605
  • Toronto Canada
Re: TTI PSA settings
« Reply #1 on: December 20, 2015, 12:24:35 PM »

Hi all, I am trying to find the best settings for getting the most detailed results from the TTI PSA scanners.
Can any one help?

cheers

Have a look at bestaudio.com. Look under the "rf coord" and "scans" tabs to start.
Peter Erskine has put together a great resource. Lots of great info there including a database of scans from venues around the world.

A few things that help on the TTi...
- set the scan to "average"and the average number to 4 or higher. Gives a more consistent result than a one-shot scan.
- set the ref level to -20dbm unless you are very close to some powerful transmitters to help see weaker signals
- the 15kHz setting for rbw gives good results with the 60MHz spans for scanning broadcast channels
- having the vertical scale at 5db/div to start.
- shifting the vertical scale downwards makes it easier to see lower level signals.
- having the video filter on usually gives clearer readings on the display
« Last Edit: December 20, 2015, 12:49:16 PM by John Sulek »
Logged

alex.cerutti

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 26
Re: TTI PSA settings
« Reply #2 on: December 20, 2015, 08:15:38 PM »

Thanks For the info John, I have been making my way through his web site its very informative.

cheers


Logged

ProSoundWeb Community

Re: TTI PSA settings
« Reply #2 on: December 20, 2015, 08:15:38 PM »


Pages: [1]   Go Up
 



Site Hosted By Ashdown Technologies, Inc.

Page created in 0.026 seconds with 21 queries.