ProSoundWeb Community

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: is this what was intended for wifi?  (Read 1435 times)

Pete Erskine

  • Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1341
    • Best Audio
is this what was intended for wifi?
« on: November 12, 2015, 12:19:31 pm »

Spectrum at my event today.
Three multi accesspoint systems all together each with 30 AP.

AND lighting is using wireless DMX!
Logged
Pete Erskine
917-750-1134
www.bestaudio.com
peter@bestaudio.com

Henry Cohen

  • Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 915
  • Westchester Co., NY, USA
Re: is this what was intended for wifi?
« Reply #1 on: November 12, 2015, 03:16:54 pm »

Spectrum at my event today.
Three multi accesspoint systems all together each with 30 AP.

AND lighting is using wireless DMX!

In a sense, yes. The spectrum and protocols were intended to be environments for large or small numbers of users to occupy more or less simultaneously and letting the equipment deal with the spectrum use/congestion details (basically latency). So what if a web page or email down loads a little slower? So what if a light cue happens a second or so late :-)
Logged
Henry Cohen

CP Communications    www.cpcomms.com
Radio Active Designs   www.radioactiverf.com

frank kayser

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1412
  • Maryland suburbs of Washington DC
Re: is this what was intended for wifi?
« Reply #2 on: November 12, 2015, 04:10:02 pm »

Spectrum at my event today.
Three multi accesspoint systems all together each with 30 AP.

AND lighting is using wireless DMX!


So what you're saying is that all this is basically being generated by one network "system" .
ow.
frank
Logged

ProSoundWeb Community

Re: is this what was intended for wifi?
« Reply #2 on: November 12, 2015, 04:10:02 pm »


Pages: [1]   Go Up
 



Page created in 0.073 seconds with 23 queries.