ProSoundWeb Community

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Pages: 1 [2]  All   Go Down

Author Topic: Mechanical amplification?  (Read 9891 times)

Jonathan Johnson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3210
  • Southwest Washington (state, not DC)
Re: Mechanical amplification?
« Reply #10 on: December 09, 2014, 01:17:54 AM »

"...We spent much time and money in endeavours to introduce it on violins, 'cellos, and double-bass instruments, but were virtually blocked or boycotted by the Musical Fraternity, because they found it would reduce the number of executants from one-fifth to one-tenth for the same volume of sound..."

And thus it began, the everlasting conflict between talent and engineers. Just think, instead of one lead guitar on stage, we could have ten! Is there a stage large enough for that many egos?
Logged
Stop confusing the issue with facts and logic!

Steve M Smith

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3381
  • Isle of Wight - England
Re: Mechanical amplification?
« Reply #11 on: December 09, 2014, 01:55:02 AM »

note the aluminium "misspelling on the patent.

I think you spell it wrong because Sir Humphry Davy got it wrong in a publication.

Look at some of the other element names... Magnesium, Thaillium, Plutonium, Californium, Einsteinium etc. There's even Americium.  If you didn't 'correct' that one then Aluminium should have stayed intact too!

My favourites are Balonium and Unobtanium but I couldn't find them on the chart!

EDIT:  As suspected, it was Humphry Davy's fault!  http://www.worldwidewords.org/articles/aluminium.htm

Steve.
« Last Edit: December 09, 2014, 03:12:24 AM by Steve M Smith »
Logged

Mike Sokol

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3361
  • Lead instructor for the No~Shock~Zone
    • No~Shock~Zone Electrical Safety
Re: Mechanical amplification?
« Reply #12 on: December 09, 2014, 07:50:02 AM »

I think you spell it wrong because Sir Humphry Davy got it wrong in a publication.

Look at some of the other element names... Magnesium, Thaillium, Plutonium, Californium, Einsteinium etc. There's even Americium.  If you didn't 'correct' that one then Aluminium should have stayed intact too!

My favourites are Balonium and Unobtanium but I couldn't find them on the chart!

EDIT:  As suspected, it was Humphry Davy's fault!  http://www.worldwidewords.org/articles/aluminium.htm

Steve. ;D

Steve, I put in the misspelling comment just for YOU...  ;D

Steve M Smith

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3381
  • Isle of Wight - England
Re: Mechanical amplification?
« Reply #13 on: December 09, 2014, 08:50:10 AM »

Steve, I put in the misspelling comment just for YOU...  ;D

I know!!


Steve.
Logged

Jonathan Johnson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3210
  • Southwest Washington (state, not DC)
Re: Mechanical amplification?
« Reply #14 on: December 09, 2014, 10:37:16 AM »

I think you spell it wrong because Sir Humphry Davy got it wrong in a publication.

Look at some of the other element names... Magnesium, Thaillium, Plutonium, Californium, Einsteinium etc. There's even Americium.  If you didn't 'correct' that one then Aluminium should have stayed intact too!

My favourites are Balonium and Unobtanium but I couldn't find them on the chart!

When you Brits are trying to finish a thought, do you say, "iummmm"?
Logged
Stop confusing the issue with facts and logic!

Bill McIntosh

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 399
  • Louisville KY
Re: Mechanical amplification?
« Reply #15 on: December 10, 2014, 10:11:33 PM »

Last night I got to wondering, is there any way to amplify live audio without using electricity?


How about diesel?   8)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xazsh48GhWE

It was not clear whether the measured SPL was A or C weighted... :o
Logged
You always have to do the right thing, but that's not enough. You have a job where people have to trust you. You have to LOOK like you're doing the right thing.

Mike Sokol

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3361
  • Lead instructor for the No~Shock~Zone
    • No~Shock~Zone Electrical Safety
Re: Mechanical amplification?
« Reply #16 on: December 11, 2014, 06:10:03 AM »

How about diesel?   8)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xazsh48GhWE

It was not clear whether the measured SPL was A or C weighted... :o

I remember seeing something about tuned chain saws.  :o

ProSoundWeb Community

Re: Mechanical amplification?
« Reply #16 on: December 11, 2014, 06:10:03 AM »


Pages: 1 [2]  All   Go Up
 



Site Hosted By Ashdown Technologies, Inc.

Page created in 0.036 seconds with 25 queries.