ProSoundWeb Community

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5]   Go Down

Author Topic: JBL SRX700 Series Equivalents  (Read 17346 times)

Jonathan Goodall

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 483
  • New Zealand
Re: JBL SRX700 Series Equivalents
« Reply #40 on: December 01, 2014, 01:09:34 pm »

I really am surprised that there is no STX822, the SRX722 seemed really popular.
Logged

Bob Leonard

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6807
  • Boston, MA USA
Re: JBL SRX700 Series Equivalents
« Reply #41 on: December 01, 2014, 03:02:10 pm »

Antiquated?

I think not. 

I agree. Just because a driver doesn't use neo it doesn't mean it's an antique. I'll take ceramic over neo any day of the week, especially where JBL is concerned.
Logged
BOSTON STRONG........
Proud Vietnam Veteran

I did a gig for Otis Elevator once. Like every job, it had it's ups and downs.

Mike Diack

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 367
  • Auckland, New Zealand.
Re: JBL SRX700 Series Equivalents
« Reply #42 on: December 01, 2014, 05:31:35 pm »

I agree. Just because a driver doesn't use neo it doesn't mean it's an antique. I'll take ceramic over neo any day of the week, especially where JBL is concerned.
Why the dislike for Nd?. While the big boys with their chain motor lifted line arrays may not be too concerned
with weight issues, a weekend warrior lifting a 2446 on to a 3 way groundstack is sure going to appreciate a 2452.
BTW re the "antiquated" comment, the 2226 used in the STX appears in my 1998 JBL catalog, long before the 2265 used in the SRX. Backwards progress?.
M
Logged

ProSoundWeb Community

Re: JBL SRX700 Series Equivalents
« Reply #42 on: December 01, 2014, 05:31:35 pm »


Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5]   Go Up
 



Page created in 0.039 seconds with 22 queries.