ProSoundWeb Community

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Pages: 1 [2]  All   Go Down

Author Topic: Thunderbolt vs. Firewire 800 or USB 3.0  (Read 7855 times)

Andrew Broughton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2318
    • Check Check One Two
Re: Thunderbolt vs. Firewire 800 or USB 3.0
« Reply #10 on: August 30, 2014, 05:17:16 PM »

Recording to external drive, the pinch point was USB or FireWire 800 with FireWire 800 clearly winning.  Still could run out of pipeline though if you went 96k or high [32+] track count.
Unless my calculations are wrong (and let me know if they are) 24bit/96k x 48tracks is only 13.5mb/sec so how would you be running out of pipeline?
Logged
-Andy

"Well, my days of not taking you seriously are certainly coming to a middle..."

http://www.checkcheckonetwo.com
Saving lives through Digital Audio, Programming and Electronics.

Tommy Peel

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1468
  • Longview, Texas
Re: Thunderbolt vs. Firewire 800 or USB 3.0
« Reply #11 on: August 30, 2014, 05:54:22 PM »

Been following this thread for a while. I just did some drive testing on my MacBook Pro which as an Intel SSD as the main drive and a 500gb 5400rpm drive in the optical bay. I also tested my 500gb Seagate USB3 external drive, but my Mac's USB ports are only 2.0 so they were clearly the bottleneck in that test. Also my SSD is only able to run at SATA 2(3.0 gbps) speeds instead of SATA 3(6.0 gbps) speeds, but I'm not sure that this SSD is fast enough for that to make much of a difference.

Anyway here are the results:






Not sure if this helps anybody, but I thought it might. I know the USB3 external drive is much faster on a USB3 port as I've used it on my brothers newer laptop that has USB3.
Logged

ProSoundWeb Community

Re: Thunderbolt vs. Firewire 800 or USB 3.0
« Reply #11 on: August 30, 2014, 05:54:22 PM »


Pages: 1 [2]  All   Go Up
 



Site Hosted By Ashdown Technologies, Inc.

Page created in 0.044 seconds with 25 queries.