ProSoundWeb Community

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Pages: 1 [2]  All   Go Down

Author Topic: D&B V-Series Released  (Read 15832 times)

Uli Göbel

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 32
Re: D&B V-Series Released
« Reply #10 on: April 10, 2012, 02:02:50 pm »

Thanx a lot Chris. Do you know the q1? Can you tell about the difference?
Logged

Jens Palm Bacher

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 315
    • Lydfabrikken
Re: D&B V-Series Released
« Reply #11 on: April 10, 2012, 03:27:46 pm »

http://www.dbaudio.com/en/systems/black-range/v-series/

I was hoping there would be some buzz about this, but I guess I will start it.

Same output as Q but has Rigging like J (awesome). Also much better coverage options. The sub looks cool too, a bigger B4 sub.


What do you guys think?
"Musikhuset" in Ĺrhus, Denmark bought a V system in exchanged for their (very fine) d&b F2 rig. Sounds very promising so far.
Logged

Chris Johnson [UK]

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 446
Re: D&B V-Series Released
« Reply #12 on: April 10, 2012, 05:25:01 pm »

Thanx a lot Chris. Do you know the q1? Can you tell about the difference?

Hi Uli,

Yes, very familiar with the Q1. Ironically, the day after the gig with V, i was onto a small beach festival with 12 Q1 and 4 J-Sub per side, so it was a good comparison.

Obviously it goes without saying i think Q is a great box, but we have to remember its 10 years old now. V has 10 more years of R&D behind it, so it should be much better. Its also nearly twice the price...

The rigging is much better - miles better in fact. But again, thats expected. The industry has learned a lot about line array ergonomics in the last 10 years.

Sonically, it has a much sweeter top end - more akin to the J than the Q. This is the one thing i have always found lacking with Q systems - 8k and up...
It also seems to go a bit lower. V with Cut off seems to have a fuller and richer low end than Q, which is interesting because its a similar low end driver config. Again, more R&D time i guess...

But i think the main reason i like it is that it ticks a lot of 'real-world' boxes. On paper and on demo i think there are a lot of good midsize systems out there, but in practice, they all fall down somewhere in the real world.
Q is too narrow - you always end up needing outfill with smaller, shorter throw gigs.
Kara is too wide, its the downfill for K1, but when you want to cover a typical 'hall' you lose a lot of energy to the walls once the room gets long and thin.
Active is cool when you want maximum headroom, but again, we have J for that (interestingly the price difference isnt huge between J and V, but of course you need double the amps), and often in the types of gigs where V would be the main system, you cant justify lots of amp $, so passive (4 boxes per D12) makes financial and truck pack sense.

I'm also a huge fan of the dual box idea - a narrower box for the main array, and a wider box for downfill or delay/short throw use. This makes covering smaller rooms easier and the system more flexible for mid-scale tours.

Lastly, 14 degree inter-element angle makes for short compact arrays when you need it, which again, works for the types of gigs where you are likely to see this box as the mains, and economises on boxes when you need an outfill for J.

So in short, if you own Q, think hard about buying V. It is better, no doubt, but Q is a good box. If you were going to buy Q, Don't. Buy V, it will be more useful in more situations. If i was starting a midsize PA rental house today and i wanted D&B, i'd probably just buy T and V...
Logged
Riedel Communications

Mikael Holm

  • Classic LAB
  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 37
Re: D&B V-Series Released
« Reply #13 on: April 10, 2012, 10:38:28 pm »

Sonically, it has a much sweeter top end - more akin to the J than the Q. This is the one thing i have always found lacking with Q systems - 8k and up...

Exactly my thoughts!

It also seems to go a bit lower. V with Cut off seems to have a fuller and richer low end than Q, which is interesting because its a similar low end driver config. Again, more R&D time i guess...

It's not about R&D but physics of the driveunits. To get high enough sensitivity in the midrange one has to sacrifice on the LF output. That's why V has the 8" MF cone so that there must not be such big compromise on the LF output of the 10" woofers.

Q and V are different tools for different usage and they both have their place. I don't like big rigs made of Q1 (6-8 boxes a side maximum) and Qsub is more of a midbass than real subwoofer. But still they are very versatile and excellent tools.
Logged

Uli Göbel

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 32
Re: D&B V-Series Released
« Reply #14 on: April 11, 2012, 12:51:32 pm »

Exactly my thoughts!

It's not about R&D but physics of the driveunits. To get high enough sensitivity in the midrange one has to sacrifice on the LF output. That's why V has the 8" MF cone so that there must not be such big compromise on the LF output of the 10" woofers.

Q and V are different tools for different usage and they both have their place. I don't like big rigs made of Q1 (6-8 boxes a side maximum) and Qsub is more of a midbass than real subwoofer. But still they are very versatile and excellent tools.
Thanx all. What about rumour of q1 running out. Isn´t it ? 
Logged

Uli Göbel

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 32
Re: D&B V-Series Released
« Reply #15 on: April 13, 2012, 05:01:07 am »

Thanx all. What about rumour of q1 running out. Isn´t it ?

Anybody else something to say in that ? I know this is the tricky part ;-)
Logged

Uli Göbel

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 32
Re: D&B V-Series Released
« Reply #16 on: April 16, 2012, 03:57:39 am »

Exactly my thoughts!

It's not about R&D but physics of the driveunits. To get high enough sensitivity in the midrange one has to sacrifice on the LF output. That's why V has the 8" MF cone so that there must not be such big compromise on the LF output of the 10" woofers.

Q and V are different tools for different usage and they both have their place. I don't like big rigs made of Q1 (6-8 boxes a side maximum) and Qsub is more of a midbass than real subwoofer. But still they are very versatile and excellent tools.
Logged

Uli Göbel

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 32
Re: D&B V-Series Released
« Reply #17 on: April 26, 2012, 04:08:06 am »



 Exactly my thoughts! It's not about R&D but physics of the driveunits. To get high enough sensitivity in the midrange one has
to sacrifice on the LF output. That's why V has the 8" MF cone so that there must not be such big
compromise on the LF output of the 10" woofers. Q and V are different tools for different usage and they both have their place. I don't like big rigs made of
Q1 (6-8 boxes a side maximum) and Qsub is more of a midbass than real subwoofer. But still they are
very versatile and excellent tools.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  All   Go Up
 


Page created in 0.063 seconds with 22 queries.