ProSoundWeb Community

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 2 [All]   Go Down

Author Topic: Ideas on Lab 12 MkII vs. Titanic 12 MKIII with Lab 12 folded cabinet...  (Read 6659 times)

Jason Voyles

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3

I am in the process of epoxying together the first of 4 lab 12's. I was pricing out and about to order the subwoofers when I saw something interesting.

I wanted to get a take on the “lab 12 MKII” vs. the Dayton “Titanic MKIII” subwoofers. They look somewhat equivalent, and I should be able to squeeze them into the cabinet. The Titanic looks like it would give you a lower frequency response, but I am not sure about the spec's. I think it would put some ware on the driver in a lab12 cabinet, limiting how much you could push it.

Could someone a bit more knowledgeable take a look and comment accordingly? (both are on parts express website)

Thanks..
Logged

Silas Pradetto

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3047
Re: Ideas on Lab 12 MkII vs. Titanic 12 MKIII with Lab 12 folded cabinet...
« Reply #1 on: October 15, 2010, 04:58:13 pm »

I don't even have to look at it to tell you that you should be using the LAB12 driver. The driver was specifically designed for this box and no other driver is going to work as well.

A different driver is NOT going to make the box go lower. More boxes coupling will do that, limited ultimately by the horn length.

Logged

Art Welter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4874
Re: Ideas on Lab 12 MkII vs. Titanic 12 MKIII with Lab 12 folded cabinet...
« Reply #2 on: October 15, 2010, 08:17:21 pm »

Jason Voyles wrote on Fri, 15 October 2010 14:52

I am in the process of epoxying together the first of 4 lab 12's. I was pricing out and about to order the subwoofers when I saw something interesting.

I wanted to get a take on the “lab 12 MKII” vs. the Dayton “Titanic MKIII” subwoofers. They look somewhat equivalent, and I should be able to squeeze them into the cabinet. The Titanic looks like it would give you a lower frequency response, but I am not sure about the spec's. I think it would put some ware on the driver in a lab12 cabinet, limiting how much you could push it.

Could someone a bit more knowledgeable take a look and comment accordingly? (both are on parts express website)

Thanks..

It has more Xmax, which is good, but less Bl, which is bad.
Also has a lower impedance, good if you want to get more power out of an amp, bad if the amp does not like a 2 ohm load.

I would not dismiss it without trying it, but doubt it would be an improvement.
Logged

John Halliburton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1785
Re: Ideas on Lab 12 MkII vs. Titanic 12 MKIII with Lab 12 folded cabinet...
« Reply #3 on: October 16, 2010, 08:51:30 am »

Quote:

I am in the process of epoxying together the first of 4 lab 12's.


Why?  Regular wood glue is more than good enough.  About the only area you'd want to consider epoxy or some adhesive with filling capacity is the baffle area with the compound mitered pieces that form the initial part of the flare-and only if you're woodworking skills didn't produce a tight fitting set of pieces.

So much extra work and mess for nothing.

Best regards,

John
Logged

Ivan Beaver

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 9010
Re: Ideas on Lab 12 MkII vs. Titanic 12 MKIII with Lab 12 folded cabinet...
« Reply #4 on: October 16, 2010, 09:43:27 am »

John Halliburton wrote on Sat, 16 October 2010 08:51

Quote:

I am in the process of epoxying together the first of 4 lab 12's.


Why?  Regular wood glue is more than good enough.  About the only area you'd want to consider epoxy or some adhesive with filling capacity is the baffle area with the compound mitered pieces that form the initial part of the flare-and only if you're woodworking skills didn't produce a tight fitting set of pieces.

So much extra work and mess for nothing.

Best regards,

John


PL Premium is a good choice as it is super strong-fills gaps-and has a slight expanding characteristic.

More expensive than regular wood glue-but MUCH less expensive and less hassle and much easier to apply than epoxy.
Logged
For every complicated question-there is a simple- easy to understand WRONG answer.

Can I have some more talent in the monitors--PLEASE?

Ivan Beaver
dB Audio & Video Inc.
Danley Sound Labs

Chuck Harrigan

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 214
Re: Ideas on Lab 12 MkII vs. Titanic 12 MKIII with Lab 12 folded cabinet...
« Reply #5 on: October 29, 2010, 11:49:26 pm »

Ivan Beaver wrote on Sat, 16 October 2010 09:43

John Halliburton wrote on Sat, 16 October 2010 08:51

Quote:

I am in the process of epoxying together the first of 4 lab 12's.


Why?  Regular wood glue is more than good enough.  About the only area you'd want to consider epoxy or some adhesive with filling capacity is the baffle area with the compound mitered pieces that form the initial part of the flare-and only if you're woodworking skills didn't produce a tight fitting set of pieces.

So much extra work and mess for nothing.

Best regards,

John


PL Premium is a good choice as it is super strong-fills gaps-and has a slight expanding characteristic.

More expensive than regular wood glue-but MUCH less expensive and less hassle and much easier to apply than epoxy.


+1

This is what I use when building speaker cabinets
Logged
There is no electronic solution to a personnel problem.

-Andy Peters

Josh Billings

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 949
    • http://www.mindboxmedia.com/soundsystem
Re: Ideas on Lab 12 MkII vs. Titanic 12 MKIII with Lab 12 folded cabinet...
« Reply #6 on: October 30, 2010, 06:46:30 am »

Chuck Harrigan wrote on Fri, 29 October 2010 20:49

Ivan Beaver wrote on Sat, 16 October 2010 09:43

John Halliburton wrote on Sat, 16 October 2010 08:51

Quote:

I am in the process of epoxying together the first of 4 lab 12's.


Why?  Regular wood glue is more than good enough.  About the only area you'd want to consider epoxy or some adhesive with filling capacity is the baffle area with the compound mitered pieces that form the initial part of the flare-and only if you're woodworking skills didn't produce a tight fitting set of pieces.

So much extra work and mess for nothing.

Best regards,

John


PL Premium is a good choice as it is super strong-fills gaps-and has a slight expanding characteristic.

More expensive than regular wood glue-but MUCH less expensive and less hassle and much easier to apply than epoxy.


+1

This is what I use when building speaker cabinets


+2
Logged

Duncan McLennan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2375
Re: Ideas on Lab 12 MkII vs. Titanic 12 MKIII with Lab 12 folded cabinet...
« Reply #7 on: October 30, 2010, 09:49:21 am »

PL Premium for me too!
Logged
dcm
Waterloo & London, Ontario

Duane Silveira

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 38
Re: Ideas on Lab 12 MkII vs. Titanic 12 MKIII with Lab 12 folded cabinet...
« Reply #8 on: October 30, 2010, 05:00:22 pm »

Keep in mind that you really shouldnt have any gaps to fill. If you do, then you have measured/cut incorectly. Take the extra time to get the parts fitting just right, if they arent..then do them over again!! Its worth it in the end knowing you have done it right and can be proud of it. Smile
Logged

Jeff Robinson

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 144
    • http://www.geocities.com/loudspeakerguru
Re: Ideas on Lab 12 MkII vs. Titanic 12 MKIII with Lab 12 folded cabinet...
« Reply #9 on: November 15, 2010, 01:29:50 pm »

Jason Voyles wrote on Fri, 15 October 2010 15:52

I am in the process of epoxying together the first of 4 lab 12's. I was pricing out and about to order the subwoofers when I saw something interesting.

I wanted to get a take on the “lab 12 MKII” vs. the Dayton “Titanic MKIII” subwoofers. They look somewhat equivalent, and I should be able to squeeze them into the cabinet. The Titanic looks like it would give you a lower frequency response, but I am not sure about the spec's. I think it would put some ware on the driver in a lab12 cabinet, limiting how much you could push it.

Could someone a bit more knowledgeable take a look and comment accordingly? (both are on parts express website)

Thanks..


Jason

If you want a drop-in alternate, look at the Quattro QT305-4.

The Titanic's Qms is too low. Per Tom Danley you need for the Qms to be >9. The Vas and Qes are pretty close. Xmax is respectable at 10MM. About $40 less, stamped frame and lower power handling are the trade offs for the lower cost.

HTH

Jeff Robinson
Logged
Hail to thee, blithe Spirit!
Bird thou never wert
That from Heaven, or near it
Pourest thy full heart
In profuse strains of unpremeditated art
...
Such harmonious madness
From my lips would flow
The world should listen then, as I am listening now!

Silas Pradetto

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3047
Re: Ideas on Lab 12 MkII vs. Titanic 12 MKIII with Lab 12 folded cabinet...
« Reply #10 on: November 15, 2010, 03:31:35 pm »

Jeff Robinson wrote on Mon, 15 November 2010 13:29

Jason Voyles wrote on Fri, 15 October 2010 15:52

I am in the process of epoxying together the first of 4 lab 12's. I was pricing out and about to order the subwoofers when I saw something interesting.

I wanted to get a take on the “lab 12 MKII” vs. the Dayton “Titanic MKIII” subwoofers. They look somewhat equivalent, and I should be able to squeeze them into the cabinet. The Titanic looks like it would give you a lower frequency response, but I am not sure about the spec's. I think it would put some ware on the driver in a lab12 cabinet, limiting how much you could push it.

Could someone a bit more knowledgeable take a look and comment accordingly? (both are on parts express website)

Thanks..


Jason

If you want a drop-in alternate, look at the Quattro QT305-4.

The Titanic's Qms is too low. Per Tom Danley you need for the Qms to be >9. The Vas and Qes are pretty close. Xmax is respectable at 10MM. About $40 less, stamped frame and lower power handling are the trade offs for the lower cost.

HTH

Jeff Robinson



That driver is discontinued.

The whole "Let's build a giant horn sub for max performance then cripple it's output with a $60 driver" just kind of defeats the whole purpose, doesn't it?

PS-there is a driver better than the LAB12 but I can't tell you what it is.
Logged

Duane Silveira

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 38
Re: Ideas on Lab 12 MkII vs. Titanic 12 MKIII with Lab 12 folded cabinet...
« Reply #11 on: November 16, 2010, 01:24:24 am »

Silas...If you told us you would have to kill us??
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [All]   Go Up
 

Page created in 0.042 seconds with 18 queries.