Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[Bennett Prescott]

[Charlie Zureki]

Bennett Prescott wrote on Fri, 28 August 2009 10:49

 

He just wants to "feel good" about going digital..... as he murmurs .... need more sub....

Cheers,
Hammer

[Stavross (Sam Buck)]

I think the problem is that the "on" switches are engaged.

[Clayton Luckie]

Can we assume that the DJ wasn't actually speaking, but that would be the monitor bleed-thru on the DJ vox?

cl

[Nathan Short]

What a bandwidth shame.  There are so many ways to make even a douche bag DJ sound good. Without just limiting the piss out of it.

[Jamin Lynch]

Bennett Prescott wrote on Fri, 28 August 2009 10:49

That is funny as hell!!!!!!  

[Bennett Prescott]

Nathan Short wrote on Fri, 28 August 2009 13:48

What a bandwidth shame.  There are so many ways to make even a douche bag DJ sound good. Without just limiting the piss out of it.

Not when he varies his level 20dB between tracks. I dialed in the attack and release until it didn't suck too much, but this was a corporate event and he had no business breaking 100 dB on the floor.

Yes, that is just bleed from his mic... SM58 with 25dB gain.

[Charlie Zureki]

   My suggestion for just such events:

 TWO of these:



 Cheers,
 Hammer

[Bennett Prescott]

I inserted these into the signal chain:

[David Morison]

On my monitor, I could see as far down the image as the pegged input meters but no further without scrolling.
Is it sad that I guessed they would be DJ channels before I even saw the labelling?  

David.