ProSoundWeb Community

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 [2]  All   Go Down

Author Topic: creating sound deadining panels  (Read 4907 times)

Dan Chujko

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3
    • http://www.DanChujkoAssoc.com
Re: creating sound deadening panels
« Reply #10 on: August 10, 2008, 11:29:24 pm »

The room in question is a nightclub. My problem is every wall is "armored" in plywood. I have done my best to array the speaker system to keep it off the walls - but in some places that simply cannot be done. I'm looking for general HF absorption in these areas where direct HF energy is exposed to solid walls.

Depending on what you consider HF . . .

If start with 1KHz and up there is a wide variety of products that are affordable.  Now it depends on your budget and if you or a contractor is going to install the material

It is not rocket science but sometimes it ends up being penny wise and pound foolish not to have a contractor to install the product.

PLEASE make sure you use a fire rated product that both your local inspector and your insurance company will approve in writing.  If you are in the club business you will remember that ugly situation a few years back.
Logged

Chad Johnson

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 285
Re: creating sound deadining panels
« Reply #11 on: August 12, 2008, 12:20:48 am »

Brad Weber wrote on Sun, 10 August 2008 07:03

Chad Johnson wrote on Fri, 08 August 2008 15:40

Everything is fire rated and paintable to match any decor with out hurting fire or acoustical performance.

Tectum has a Marketing Bulletin specifically on this topic where they define using one specific paint that comes in 50 gallon drums and very specific environmental conditions, sprayer characteristics, etc. for the application.  They also state that the panels should be painted in place and brush and roller application are specifically not recommended.  The fact is that it is quite easy to adversely affect the performance if one does not follow the manufacturer's recommendations.

 

Yes Brad, that is a good point. The sprayer PSI etc is speced by Tectum. I have spoken with Tectum reps about the painting procedures and their instructions to me confirmed regular latex paint will work fine in most applications (as has been my experience). They also offer paint advice where mildew/mold is a problem. A couple of coats of regular latex should not affect acoustic properties and this is done everywhere they are used. However, when giving advice online, I think it's best to go by the book and mention the protocols as outlined by the manufacturer, thanks for pointing that out.

When applying them to a wall in an existing building where overspray is an issue, IMHO, I have found painting them first is best. Again, I was told the reason they are recommended to be painted on the wall is because they are somewhat brittle and can flake away on the edges while being flexed and lifted and fastened into place. I found that to be accurate and that's why I suggested touching up with a roller/brush once they are put up (and spraying first).

You are also very correct in your thoughts on blanket statements are not helpful. There are many ways to address acoustics. Placements, bandwidth, absorption, diffusion, durability, cosmetics, material cost, labor cost, "fasten-ability" are all factors and no one method is best in all cases. Tectum is just one approach. I've had good luck with the product and it worked well in four specific installations I've done in the past few years.

I enjoy these threads because I am always trying to find innovative and differing approaches to acoustical issues. What are some of the absorption approaches you have found work (with a  good balance of cosmetics, durability, cost, labor, etc)?
Logged
Digital consoles are so 2006. The real future is in steering bass arrays.

Brad Weber

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2477
Re: creating sound deadining panels
« Reply #12 on: August 12, 2008, 12:13:14 pm »

If done properly it may be very feasible to paint some acoustical products, but will that attention to detail be maintained over time?  I have seen too many projects where as part of a renovation or simple sprucing up people end up painting over acoustical plaster, acoustical panels, etc. without any special consideration, only to negate much of the acoustical benefits of those materials.  So my reluctance with painting acoustical materials is greatly based on experiences with long term issues when in a few years people assume that since a material was already painted they can just get out the old brush and whatever paint they're putting on the walls and slop some paint on.

The question on what materials I typically recommend brings up an interesting point.  I certainly understand the desire to use DIY solutions in many situations, but as a Consultant I usually have to avoid them.  With DIY solutions or modified products the resulting acoustical performance is generally unknown and even if estimated, can add a large degree of uncertainty into any analysis.  Manufactured products typically have laboratory derived acoustical performance data available to use in any analysis.  If you simply want to do something that should help, DIY may be a viable option.  However, if you want a specific result or someone to say with any certainty that a solution will resolve specific problems, which is typically when a Consultant gets involved, then you almost have to base the solutions on known products for which reliable performance data is available. So many Acoustical Consultants do not avoid DIY products because of any profit motive or ties to manufacturers but rather because they need to work with products with a known performance and that is generally impractical with DIY products.

For a club type situation something like http://www.kineticsnoise.com/interiors/conform.html, or http://www.kineticsnoise.com/interiors/knp.html or http://www.kineticsnoise.com/interiors/ksp.html might also be an option (there are other manufacturers of similar products).  I've used similar products in animal habitats and prisons, so some club patrons might be right at home with them!
Logged
Brad Weber
muse Audio Video

Ivan Beaver

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 9010
Re: creating sound deadining panels
« Reply #13 on: August 12, 2008, 09:03:25 pm »

I have seen a good number of spaces that have acoustical problems and claim they have acoustic panels.

Well they do-somewhere 8o-under all that paint Laughing .  The panels are covered up with so much paint as to make them useless. Mad
Logged
For every complicated question-there is a simple- easy to understand WRONG answer.

Can I have some more talent in the monitors--PLEASE?

Ivan Beaver
dB Audio & Video Inc.
Danley Sound Labs

Gene Hardage

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 870
    • http://www.SarasotaSlim.com
Re: creating sound deadining panels
« Reply #14 on: August 20, 2008, 11:53:37 am »

jeffhtg (Jeff Kenney) wrote on Sun, 10 August 2008 20:27

The room in question is a nightclub. My problem is every wall is "armored" in plywood. I have done my best to array the speaker system to keep it off the walls - but in some places that simply cannot be done. I'm looking for general HF absorption in these areas where direct HF energy is exposed to solid walls.


Can you get the owner to look into spraying certain areas with cellulose?  I think you can paint it and they have some kind of fire retardant stuff they mix it with when they spray it on.  
Logged
Gene SARASOTA SLIM Hardage
http://www.SarasotaSlim.com
Pages: 1 [2]  All   Go Up
 

Page created in 0.067 seconds with 21 queries.