ProSoundWeb Community

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: New B&C 18DS115-4 in Keystone sub  (Read 1296 times)

David Winners

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 336
  • Bryan, OH
New B&C 18DS115-4 in Keystone sub
« on: May 17, 2018, 09:13:13 am »

The new B&C 18DS115-4 looks like a good candidate for the Keystone sub.

+2.5 mm (16.5 mm) xmax over the 18SW115-4 (14 mm)
Same 97dB sensitivity

My main concern is the 3.3 ohms Re, though in all honesty, I don't know enough to know what to be concerned with...

Any thoughts?

Thanks for your time,

David

Edited to correct sensitivity... A couple times
« Last Edit: May 17, 2018, 09:23:28 am by David Winners »
Logged

Art Welter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1441
Re: New B&C 18DS115-4 in Keystone sub
« Reply #1 on: May 17, 2018, 01:27:36 pm »

The new B&C 18DS115-4 looks like a good candidate for the Keystone sub.

+2.5 mm (16.5 mm) xmax over the 18SW115-4 (14 mm)
Same 97dB sensitivity

My main concern is the 3.3 ohms Re, though in all honesty, I don't know enough to know what to be concerned with...

Any thoughts?

David,
Although the BC18DS115-4 specifications look like it would work well in the Keystone, it does not look like it would work any better than the BC18SW115-4.

The two drivers have the same Re, the 18DS115-4 more Xmax, the 18SW115-4 more Xvar.

The 1dB sensitivity increase is above 100 Hz, the 18DS115-4 is slightly less sensitive below.

The 18DS115-4 has more Bl & Mms and lower Fs (below the Keystone's Fb) which may result in less output near Fb but slightly less steep cutoff below.

The Keystone's mouth exit was specifically designed for optimal response with the 18SW115-4, enough reason to use it rather than another driver unless there is a compelling cost difference or large increase in excursion.

Art
Logged

David Winners

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 336
  • Bryan, OH
Re: New B&C 18DS115-4 in Keystone sub
« Reply #2 on: May 17, 2018, 02:58:52 pm »

Thanks for taking a look Sir.

I appreciate your time.

David
Logged

Ivan Beaver

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8675
  • Atlanta GA
Re: New B&C 18DS115-4 in Keystone sub
« Reply #3 on: May 17, 2018, 05:15:30 pm »



My main concern is the 3.3 ohms Re, though in all honesty, I don't know enough to know what to be concerned with...


The Re is the DC resistance-NOT the impedance load presented to the amplifier.

In almost all cases the impedance (opposition to AC current flow) is higher than the resistance (opposition to DC current flow).

In some cases (specifically horns) the actual impedance load on the amplifier is higher than the rated impedance of the driver.

In some cases it is actually twice what the rated impedance is.

I would not give Re a second thought.

Logged
A complex question is easily answered by a simple-easy to understand WRONG answer!

Ivan Beaver
Danley Sound Labs

PHYSICS- NOT FADS!

Art Welter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1441
Re: New B&C 18DS115-4 in Keystone sub
« Reply #4 on: May 17, 2018, 08:24:02 pm »

The Re is the DC resistance-NOT the impedance load presented to the amplifier.

In almost all cases the impedance (opposition to AC current flow) is higher than the resistance (opposition to DC current flow).

In some cases (specifically horns) the actual impedance load on the amplifier is higher than the rated impedance of the driver.

In some cases it is actually twice what the rated impedance is.

I would not give Re a second thought.
Ivan,

In almost every FLH, TH or BR design, the impedance drops to very near Re at Fc or Fb.

The average and peak impedance may be much higher, but the impedance minima is still there, presented to the amplifier.

As an example, the "4 ohm" TH-118 is less than 4 ohms from around 55 Hz to almost 80 Hz (dropping to 3 ohms)- plenty of EDM droning frequencies in that region to heat things up.

But don't give it a second thought, with the 3.3 ohm Re B&C18SW115-4 instead of the 2.5 ohm Re of the 18NLW9600-4, the TH-118 impedance hardly drops below 4 ohms ;^).

Art
Logged

David Winners

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 336
  • Bryan, OH
Re: New B&C 18DS115-4 in Keystone sub
« Reply #5 on: May 30, 2018, 10:17:07 am »

It looks like the best bang for your buck is the 18TBW100. I have 2 NU6000DSP to run 4 Keystones. The 4 ohm version would have plenty of headroom running one per channel.

Using the 18SW115 would cost $725 more for 4 Keystones and would (probably?) take more amp to see any increase in SPL.
Logged

Art Welter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1441
Re: New B&C 18DS115-4 in Keystone sub
« Reply #6 on: May 31, 2018, 12:26:28 pm »

It looks like the best bang for your buck is the 18TBW100. I have 2 NU6000DSP to run 4 Keystones. The 4 ohm version would have plenty of headroom running one per channel.

Using the 18SW115 would cost $725 more for 4 Keystones and would (probably?) take more amp to see any increase in SPL.
The 18TBW100-4 is slightly more sensitive overall, but the 18SW115-4 has more Bl, which may result in slightly more bottom end response around Fb in the Keystone.

The NU6000DSP should be OK for the 18TBW100-4, but a little more peak power could be used for the 18SW115-4.
Logged

David Winners

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 336
  • Bryan, OH
Re: New B&C 18DS115-4 in Keystone sub
« Reply #7 on: June 12, 2018, 12:22:29 pm »

The 18TBW100-4 is slightly more sensitive overall, but the 18SW115-4 has more Bl, which may result in slightly more bottom end response around Fb in the Keystone.

The NU6000DSP should be OK for the 18TBW100-4, but a little more peak power could be used for the 18SW115-4.

Thanks Art
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
 


Page created in 0.079 seconds with 22 queries.