ProSoundWeb Community

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Pages: [1] 2 3  All   Go Down

Author Topic: Multi-Track Recording Solutions  (Read 3884 times)

Dave Dermont

  • Forum Moderator
  • Global Moderator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 377
  • From The Great Pocono Northeast
Multi-Track Recording Solutions
« on: February 21, 2018, 12:41:57 PM »

Hey gang,

A venue I work with wants to be able to record live multi-tracks of the shows. The current provider is using an Onyx 1640i and a Mac with Logic Pro X. The Mackie Onyx is Firewire interface, which pretty much rules out a Windows computer. Since a dedicated recording computer is already available, I'd like to go with something with USB.

USB interface is the one thing I don't want to be talked out of.

I have experience with a Soundcraft Impact, and this would probably be my first choice, but I am looking for less expensive alternatives. The Impact is $2k-ish. I am not aware of any lower priced Soundcraft digital mixers with a Multi-Track interface

Soundcraft makes the Signature 22MTK, which is only $800, but for this kind of money, why not just get a Behringer X32 Rack?

This is for a performance venue that runs multiple stages for summertime festivals, so any additional utility would be welcome. This makes the X32 rack very attractive, since it can be used both with a stage box or as a stage box.

The non-mixer interface solutions, while less expensive, all seem kind of messy.

Thank you for your suggestions.
Logged
Dave Dermont

Warning: Dates on calendar may be closer than they appear

Andrea Litti

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 47
    • my FB page
Re: Multi-Track Recording Solutions
« Reply #1 on: February 21, 2018, 12:54:03 PM »

I use a A&H Qu-16 with an external HDD plugged into the qu-drive port, record the show, then save the track files on my computer and load them into my daw of choice
Logged

Scott Gaines

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 79
Re: Multi-Track Recording Solutions
« Reply #2 on: February 21, 2018, 12:57:01 PM »

The Allen-Heath QU series does great multitracking.
I use the QU16. It takes some time to learn it, and only the best USB flash drives are compatible for multitracking, but the results are undeniable.
Logged

Dave Garoutte

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3408
  • San Rafael, CA
Re: Multi-Track Recording Solutions
« Reply #3 on: February 21, 2018, 01:18:46 PM »

Consider the Ui24.  Around $1k.
It's a stagebox style remote mixer, but it has easy usb recording and playback.  Plug in a stick and go.
LOTS of other nice features.
Logged
Nothing can be made idiot-proof; only idiot resistant.

Events.  Stage, PA, Lighting and Backline rentals.
Chauvet dealer.  Home of the Angler.
Inventor.  And now, Streaming Video!

Steve Crump

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 474
Re: Multi-Track Recording Solutions
« Reply #4 on: February 21, 2018, 01:22:00 PM »

I have used the QU-16 and Midas M32R with a PC and USB to multi-track at our venue. No complaints with either. We turn the tracks over to a college radio station, they edit and broadcast. For this function I really don't see a difference in units.
Rack may be a great option. Look at the Allen and Heath QU-SB if you are thinking rack, just another great option.
 
Logged

Dave Dermont

  • Forum Moderator
  • Global Moderator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 377
  • From The Great Pocono Northeast
Re: Multi-Track Recording Solutions
« Reply #5 on: February 21, 2018, 01:43:30 PM »

Consider the Ui24.  Around $1k.
It's a stagebox style remote mixer, but it has easy usb recording and playback.  Plug in a stick and go.
LOTS of other nice features.

The Ui24 seems to have the capacity to plug in a Monitor/Keyboard/Mouse directly.

The QSC TouchMix 30 Pro has the functionality I am looking for and a pile of AUX mixes, plus the provider I spoke of in my original post just bought one.
Logged
Dave Dermont

Warning: Dates on calendar may be closer than they appear

Joris Jans2

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 89
    • Vester Theater Techniek
Re: Multi-Track Recording Solutions
« Reply #6 on: February 21, 2018, 03:16:44 PM »

i've had great experience with the X32 rack for recording. stable, easy to use. i use it with my band both for (in ear) monitors and recording of both rehearsels & live perfomances
Logged

Dave Garoutte

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3408
  • San Rafael, CA
Re: Multi-Track Recording Solutions
« Reply #7 on: February 21, 2018, 03:39:42 PM »

One of the cool things about the Ui, is that it doesn't use an app.
Any device that has a web browser and wireless can operate it, phone, laptop, tablet from any manufacturer.
Logged
Nothing can be made idiot-proof; only idiot resistant.

Events.  Stage, PA, Lighting and Backline rentals.
Chauvet dealer.  Home of the Angler.
Inventor.  And now, Streaming Video!

Kemper Watson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 710
  • Woodstock GA
Re: Multi-Track Recording Solutions
« Reply #8 on: February 21, 2018, 04:06:36 PM »

The Allen-Heath QU series does great multitracking.
I use the QU16. It takes some time to learn it, and only the best USB flash drives are compatible for multitracking, but the results are undeniable.
What flash drives are you using? I get a lot of errors unless I use the WD Passport Ultra USB hard drives
Logged

boburtz

  • SR Forums
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 372
  • San Francisco Bay Area
    • SoundWizard Productions
Re: Multi-Track Recording Solutions
« Reply #9 on: February 21, 2018, 04:12:29 PM »

What flash drives are you using? I get a lot of errors unless I use the WD Passport Ultra USB hard drives
I've used Sandisk Extreme 500 SSD without issue for 16 tracks.

ProSoundWeb Community

Re: Multi-Track Recording Solutions
« Reply #9 on: February 21, 2018, 04:12:29 PM »


Pages: [1] 2 3  All   Go Up
 



Site Hosted By Ashdown Technologies, Inc.

Page created in 0.029 seconds with 23 queries.