ProSoundWeb Community

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Pages: [1] 2  All   Go Down

Author Topic: Coaxial Differential Dispersion ?  (Read 7383 times)

lindsay Dean

  • Classic LAB
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 798
Coaxial Differential Dispersion ?
« on: June 07, 2017, 02:49:38 PM »

ivan do you have time to explain this term?
Logged
"A mans got to know his limitations"
     and Pray for higher guidance

Lee Buckalew

  • Classic LAB
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1384
  • St. Louis, MO area
    • Pro Sound Advice, Inc.
Re: Coaxial Differential Dispersion ?
« Reply #1 on: June 07, 2017, 03:24:12 PM »

ivan do you have time to explain this term?

What are your specific questions?

It is a coaxial design or, more realistically it is a dual concentric although I believe that phrase is trademarked so....

The Differential Dispersion portion indicates that it has a different dispersion characteristic at one portion of the horn than at another.  The horizontal coverage varies/tapers through the vertical coverage. 

The goal is to create a speaker that has a coverage pattern that is more even in SPL and frequency response with a dispersion characteristic that allows for fewer speakers to be utilized than would be required if more traditional speakers were utilized.  The hot spot in the pattern is 5 degrees (or so, a few models have slightly different coverage) below the top of the coverage so your speaker aiming can now focus the hot spot at the farthest seats while not spraying HF above that coverage point and wasting a significant portion of your horn coverage angle.  Meanwhile the HF decreases in level because it increases in horizontal angle as you move down through the vertical coverage angle.  When placed properly this makes the relative SPL far more even throughout the listening area than would be achieved with a standard speaker design.

Here is a link to the brochure where there is a simplified marketing explanation.

https://static.martin-audio.com/downloads/brochures/MartinAudioCDDbrochure.pdf

Each model has EASE data available on the website so that you can plug it in and look at the coverage at various frequencies, model by model.

Lee

Logged
Lee Buckalew
Pro Sound Advice, Inc.

Ivan Beaver

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 9538
  • Atlanta GA
Re: Coaxial Differential Dispersion ?
« Reply #2 on: June 08, 2017, 12:51:36 PM »

ivan do you have time to explain this term?
I have never heard of the term.  It is manufacturer specific for their product.

Lee would know more about it than me.

The only comment I will make about horns that have different patterns in one part vs another is the same as usual.

It all "depends" on the physical size of the horn and the freq of interest.

As with any other device, the pattern is NOT what it is rated at-for all freq.

The actual radiation pattern will vary with freq-depending on how large the horn is.

This goes for ALL loudspeakers from all manufacturers.

You MUST look at various freq to see how well the pattern is "controlled".

SIZE MATTERS, and small horns simply don't control much of the freq spectrum, just the top octave or two-depending on the pattern.

Narrower horns have to be LARGER to have the same control as wide horns.
Logged
A complex question is easily answered by a simple-easy to understand WRONG answer!

Ivan Beaver
Danley Sound Labs

PHYSICS- NOT FADS!

lindsay Dean

  • Classic LAB
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 798
Re: Coaxial Differential Dispersion ?
« Reply #3 on: June 08, 2017, 01:38:02 PM »

so lets use as an example 500 to 10 k how large would the "horn" have to be to get decent pattern contol ?
Logged
"A mans got to know his limitations"
     and Pray for higher guidance

lindsay Dean

  • Classic LAB
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 798
Re: Coaxial Differential Dispersion ?
« Reply #4 on: June 08, 2017, 01:40:11 PM »

it seems a lot of brands have virtual " audio spray bottle" control except for a limited range, correct ?
Logged
"A mans got to know his limitations"
     and Pray for higher guidance

Lee Buckalew

  • Classic LAB
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1384
  • St. Louis, MO area
    • Pro Sound Advice, Inc.
Re: Coaxial Differential Dispersion ?
« Reply #5 on: June 08, 2017, 01:51:05 PM »

so lets use as an example 500 to 10 k how large would the "horn" have to be to get decent pattern contol ?

Use the EASE data that is available and check.  It is very accurate.
Yes, you lose pattern control the lower in frequency that you get but there is effective control down lower than might be thought by many.

Lee
Logged
Lee Buckalew
Pro Sound Advice, Inc.

Nathan Riddle

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2053
  • Niceville, FL
    • Nailed Productions
Re: Coaxial Differential Dispersion ?
« Reply #6 on: June 08, 2017, 06:02:27 PM »

From what I read the whole concept for the CDD "Coaxial Differential Dispersion" isn't to control low freq radiation; it is to widen the HF radiation to match the low freq pattern for up close.

Then, in addition to that, as Lee said; 'throw' the HF better because of the 5* 'hot spot' in the pattern (vertically).

Example:
K12 75* pattern, really its more like: 30* from 12k up (getting narrower as freq raises), and 50* from 8k up (getting narrower as freq raises) and 75* from 4k up (getting narrower as freq raises)...

Whereas the Martin CDD's pattern "control" is more of a widening of the HF response so that even up at 12kHz the pattern is still 60* as stated in the brochure.

Disclaimer: values are arbitrary.

Someone correct me if I'm wrong.
Logged
I'm just a guy trying to do the next right thing.

This business is for people with too much energy for desk jobs and too much brain for labor jobs. - Scott Helmke

Lee Buckalew

  • Classic LAB
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1384
  • St. Louis, MO area
    • Pro Sound Advice, Inc.
Re: Coaxial Differential Dispersion ?
« Reply #7 on: June 08, 2017, 06:07:12 PM »

it seems a lot of brands have virtual " audio spray bottle" control except for a limited range, correct ?

I am not sure what you are meaning by "audio spray bottle". 

I will give you an example of a use with a CDD LIVE 12.  I have a client that is a Grammy winning Symphony Orchetsra.  They were testing some CDD LIVE 12's for various uses.  They often have meetings, gatherings, etc. in the 3 story tall marble grand entry of their building.  They have typically used standard self powered aa x bb coverage angle speakers on sticks for this.  It is always either too loud up front or too quiet in the back and there is always too much reflection back off the opposition wall. 

They used a single CDD LIVE 12 on a stand exactly per the manuals suggested placement.  It was not too loud for people in the front, it was not too quiet for people in the back, it did not drop off at the sides in the front, there was not noticeable/distracting slap from the wall opposite the speaker.

Beyond stories of use are there specific questions?

No, I don't work for Martin Audio.  Yes, I design quite a bit with them, but also with many other brands.

Lee
Logged
Lee Buckalew
Pro Sound Advice, Inc.

Lee Buckalew

  • Classic LAB
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1384
  • St. Louis, MO area
    • Pro Sound Advice, Inc.
Re: Coaxial Differential Dispersion ?
« Reply #8 on: June 08, 2017, 06:11:47 PM »

From what I read the whole concept for the CDD "Coaxial Differential Dispersion" isn't to control low freq radiation; it is to widen the HF radiation to match the low freq pattern for up close.

Then, in addition to that, as Lee said; 'throw' the HF better because of the 5* 'hot spot' in the pattern (vertically).

Example:
K12 75* pattern, really its more like: 30* from 12k up (getting narrower as freq raises), and 50* from 8k up (getting narrower as freq raises) and 75* from 4k up (getting narrower as freq raises)...

Whereas the Martin CDD's pattern "control" is more of a widening of the HF response so that even up at 12kHz the pattern is still 60* as stated in the brochure.

Disclaimer: values are arbitrary.

Someone correct me if I'm wrong.

This is very much the correct thought process. 
With smaller boxes, and even the 15" is not that large, you won't get a horn large enough for LF pattern control so the focus is on creating a better HF coverage for a broader range of applications.
There is a downside.  You can't array these speakers in a typical fashion and achieve anything pleasant.

Lee
Logged
Lee Buckalew
Pro Sound Advice, Inc.

Ivan Beaver

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 9538
  • Atlanta GA
Re: Coaxial Differential Dispersion ?
« Reply #9 on: June 08, 2017, 07:16:00 PM »

so lets use as an example 500 to 10 k how large would the "horn" have to be to get decent pattern contol ?
You need to supply more information.

The rated pattern of the horn matters quite a bit.

The narrower the pattern, the larger the horn has to be.

Here is the basic formula.

I suggest you put a couple of numbers into it to get a feel for it.

freq of control=1,000,000/ (size of horn (not including the flange) in inches x rated pattern)

Lets say you have a 10* vertical horn (as common in line arrays) and it is 12" tall.

So you have 1,000,000/(10x12)=8333Hz.  So basically below 8.3KHz the horn will start to lose control and it will be wider.

If the same size horn was rated at 90* you would have 1,000,000/(90x12)=926 Hz.

Logged
A complex question is easily answered by a simple-easy to understand WRONG answer!

Ivan Beaver
Danley Sound Labs

PHYSICS- NOT FADS!

ProSoundWeb Community

Re: Coaxial Differential Dispersion ?
« Reply #9 on: June 08, 2017, 07:16:00 PM »


Pages: [1] 2  All   Go Up
 



Site Hosted By Ashdown Technologies, Inc.

Page created in 0.039 seconds with 24 queries.