ProSoundWeb Community

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Pages: 1 2 [3]   Go Down

Author Topic: Paying Crew  (Read 7267 times)

Stephen Swaffer

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2673
Re: Paying Crew
« Reply #20 on: May 16, 2017, 12:39:11 PM »

If you hire someone for X amount and they agree to it, then then what the guy next to them makes is really irrelevant-you have a "contract" that both parties agreed to.  That said, being fair and having good reasons for your pay scale are the best way to keep the best employees.

Seniority, by itself, IMO opinion doesn't rate much of a premium. If a guy is more valuable because of experience then pay him more.  Maybe it is just loading/unloading trucks and nailing lumber, but if a guy applies himself and has experience he will be more valuable and should be rewarded-if he has experience and just wants to rest on his laurels, then not so much.

I have been on both sides of the fence-employee and employer.  I have worked on a maintenance crew with guys with 20 years more experience doing the same wrok a lot of the time-but because of a job title earned by applying myself i was making $3-5 an hour more.  For the most part there was little friction-they understood what was at play.

At the risk of trivializing people, why do you pay more for one mixer than another?  You should reward character and effort more so than "talent".  Hard and fast formulas based solely on longevity and job titles don't leave your employees much incentive to improve themselves.
Logged
Steve Swaffer

Ray Aberle

  • Classic LAB
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3455
  • Located in Vancouver, WA (and serves OR-WA-ID-BC)
    • Kelcema Audio
Re: Paying Crew
« Reply #21 on: May 16, 2017, 01:27:56 PM »

I appreciate all the input so far.  I know that this varies quite a bit depending on the specifics of the gig.  I would definitely pay more to someone performing an A1 duty versus just a generic crew member.  I'm just trying to avoid a situation of sour grapes on my crew when the guy that's been working the same gig for me for years realizes he's making the exact same amount as the guy that's out on his first job and under direct supervision, despite the fact they're doing the exact same thing...or...the new guy being upset that he's making less than the more experienced guy despite the fact they're doing the exact same thing...  In this specific case it's unloading trucks, moving heavy equipment, cutting/nailing lumber,  etc.  Not exactly skilled labor, but much more than I can handle on my own.  Thanks again!

(I can see my reply factoring more on Nathan's "Business Minded Questions" thread already. :) )

I'm going to try and start at the top of the thread, and start with Jeff's OP. Now, you have two ways to look at your business structure here: Do you pay a person based on their rate of pay, or the position they are filling? The caveat is that you want to ensure that your client billing is always consistent/slightly increasing each year for COLA.

Let's dive down into this...

If you're paying based on the position they are filling, your pay structure might look like this:
Position  --  Client Charge  --  Crew Pay
A1                  $450                  $350 (based on a 10 hour work day)
A2                  $400                  $300 (based on a 10 hour work day)
Stagehand       $30/hour            $20ish/hour

That way, you bill the client that rate, you pay the crew that rate, regardless of the skillset of the person filling the role. The challenge here: If you need a stagehand for a show, and that's what you're billing to the client, and the only person you have available is one of your A1s, (s)he's probably not going to be tickled pink to take a job paying $22/hour when they could be making $40/hour working A1 somewhere else. Now it's going to be difficult to reliably staff your shows.

Side note: Pay rates should always be confidential. Sure, the crew will talk amongst each other, but make sure you're not disclosing to any of your team members what someone else is being paid, or even "Well David makes more than you, so (insert action here that you're taking to save money)."

The other way is paying someone based on their rate of pay. This is like any other job: "Hi nice person, I'm hiring you to do this creative/laborious thing. I'll pay you $20 per hour. Would you like to accept employment with me?" Then, on a regular basis, as their skill set increases, they gain experience with you and your company, or they're adding increased value to your company as an employee, you offer raises (and potentially bonuses). So, maybe I hire David for $20 per hour, and he makes that, regardless of what he's doing for me. He might be here at the shop, helping to prep trucks. He might be delivering a generator to Seattle. He might be helping load in and run a show at the local exhibition center. Either way, he's making $20 per hour, as long as he's on the clock. I'd give him quarterly or semi-annual performance reviews and pay raise. So maybe in 3 months, I give him a review, "Hey, you're doing great here, but I'd like to see you accomplish THIS in the next 90-120 days, but here's another $2 per hour."

There's a bit of a balancing act there- some days, he might be working a show that we're charging the client $400/Day Rate for him, and he only works 5 hours. But, another day, he might fill the stagehand role, where we're charging the client $30/hour for, and ends up working 15 hours, and we only budgeted for 10. Now we've lost money after payroll expenses are factored in. And something else: Unless you're prepared to always offer day rates to the team (expecting that someone can't leave work from you and pick up another gig that same day- they've probably blocked out the day for you), you do want to make sure you're keeping your guys working enough hours that they're going to be responsive to your needs.

Anyways, back to the shows. So then I send Andrew out to help David. Andrew's new, and thus he just started at $13/hour. He's working side by side with David, and doing a lot of the same things, but David's in charge, has a longer experience, and therefore is making more money, even though they're doing the same thing. David has the supervisory role in that case. Andrew would also have the opportunity to receive a review and raise at regular intervals. And, if he works hard, and maybe demonstrates a rapid growth in job knowledge, customer relations, etc, he might move up the pay scale faster than David did at the same time.

Then there's Tyson. Tyson works only at the shop, picking shows/loading trucks. He doesn't want to go out and do shows. He really doesn't want to move up in the organization- he's perfectly happy where he's at. No responsibility, no stress, free beer. He gets those same reviews, but the pay increases would be more reflective of COLA ("cost of living adjustment") and less of merit-based. He's getting paid more because life's f'ing expensive, not because he's doing anything AWESOME and out of the box to earn it.

Disclaimer: Two of these people are real, but the rates of pay are not. One's fake, although the name's been used as my fictitious sales manager. Woo hoo! Some of the events described happened this past weekend. Haha.

Takeaway: Every employee is different. It sucks, as a manager/owner, to have to consider every person differently, but that's how it should be done.

And once again, rates of pay should remain confidential. I always recommend counseling employees to not discuss them. "Nothing good will come of that," you can say. "What if you find out someone's making way more than you are? You might be pissed. Or, if you tell someone about how much more you make than they do. Now your working relationship will be damaged, if they potentially lose respect for you. Let's just keep it to ourselves."

I'm just trying to avoid a situation of sour grapes on my crew when the guy that's been working the same gig for me for years realizes he's making the exact same amount as the guy that's out on his first job and under direct supervision, despite the fact they're doing the exact same thing...
Well, if it's what that ROLE pays, then that's it. If your stagehand position pays $18/hour, then whoever does it gets paid that. But, if you're doing the individualized rates of pay, and a new guy got hired on for the same as a tenured tech, then I would wonder about that as well. "Why is this other cat not getting pay raises?"

...or...the new guy being upset that he's making less than the more experienced guy despite the fact they're doing the exact same thing... 
Enter comments about ROP remaining confidential. And if need be, you have the discussion-- "Everyone gets paid their ROP. You might be making more or less then a co-worker, and doing the same thing, but there's other intangible factors that come into play. I reward hard work, loyalty, and tenure, so you can be assured that as you gain experience with us, you will receive regular performance reviews and pay raises.

ALL OF THIS IS PREDICATED... on you correctly treating your techs as employees. If it's a freelance/1099 situation, then regular reviews, raises, blah blah blah can all be thrown out the window. In that case, I'd expect to be negotiating on a show-by-show basis with my labor. And, in my mind, that's a bunch more work that's not needed. I prefer to know what someone is going to need for pay, prior to me offering them the job. Then I can quote to the client well. I know I can call Aaron, and he'll charge me $400/day rate (OT after 10HRs). Pretty much regardless of what the needs are. And he's damn well worth it.

In this specific case it's unloading trucks, moving heavy equipment, cutting/nailing lumber,  etc.  Not exactly skilled labor, but much more than I can handle on my own.
I'm venturing into this field, finally. I've traditionally done a majority of the shop work (gear prep, QC, truck loading, etc) myself, with an occasional assist from my dad for stacking things. But, I kill my body doing that, so have started strategically using extra help from one of my guys. Now, I have to be careful since that labor isn't included in my show labor charges. In other words, that money is coming out of the gear rental charges. In the future, I need to either make sure that our show labor charges include the shop work, or accept that I'll be paying "out of pocket" for this extra work.

An aside: I value show work higher. So, one of my guys that's been helping me lately, I pay him more for show time then I do shop time. This goes against EVERYTHING I've talked about just now, but since I have just started this, I need to make sure I don't shoot myself in the foot with a lot of extra payroll costs for shop work. I'm going to try and balance it out, but for now, I'm screwing my guy over. :( But, he got hot tub time yesterday, so that made up for it!

-Ray
Logged
Kelcema Audio
Regional - Serving Pacific Northwest (OR, WA, ID, BC)

Stu McDoniel

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1144
  • Central Wisconsin...USA
Re: Paying Crew
« Reply #22 on: May 16, 2017, 02:15:22 PM »

You could do it the way the IA in Tulsa does; where the least skilled people get paid the most for doing the easiest jobs. Basically, the pay rates are inversely proportional to the skill set and experience of the individual and then divided by the complexity of the job being done.


The City of Tulsa also uses this same formula, except they also subtract 10% for longevity.
Ok funny !
Logged

Jeff Lelko

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2022
  • Cape Canaveral, FL
Re: Paying Crew
« Reply #23 on: May 16, 2017, 07:53:32 PM »

Think of it this way. You're using an algorithm to pay them now, it's just not defined and is swayed by your 'feelings' and/or 'personality' at the moment.

Your salary, the contract, estimation of expenses, etc. for your Engineering job is all algorithm driven. Computers do all of the buying & selling in the stock market, money doesn't even exist, it's all conceptual. Etc.

I was bored, it was Friday... :D

Yeah, when you put it that way you're absolutely right.  In most cases my thought process follows the second half of what Ray explained (which I'll get to in a second), but usually I just budget out what the fair daily wages should be for a given crew based on hours, show difficultly, amount of work per individual, etc.  I figured that either you'd already drawn up a formula for paying your own staff or that you had way too much time on your hands to make this example just for me!  I really appreciate it though.  I'll have to play around with it to see if I can make it work for me.

If you hire someone for X amount and they agree to it, then then what the guy next to them makes is really irrelevant-you have a "contract" that both parties agreed to.  That said, being fair and having good reasons for your pay scale are the best way to keep the best employees.

Seniority, by itself, IMO opinion doesn't rate much of a premium. If a guy is more valuable because of experience then pay him more.  Maybe it is just loading/unloading trucks and nailing lumber, but if a guy applies himself and has experience he will be more valuable and should be rewarded-if he has experience and just wants to rest on his laurels, then not so much.

I have been on both sides of the fence-employee and employer.  I have worked on a maintenance crew with guys with 20 years more experience doing the same wrok a lot of the time-but because of a job title earned by applying myself i was making $3-5 an hour more.  For the most part there was little friction-they understood what was at play.

At the risk of trivializing people, why do you pay more for one mixer than another?  You should reward character and effort more so than "talent".  Hard and fast formulas based solely on longevity and job titles don't leave your employees much incentive to improve themselves.

I agree with everything that you've written here too.  The hourly/per-job rates are a little difficult to compare, but looking to salaried positions I'm just trying to avoid the "how is it that he makes 5K a year more than I do, yet I'm the one helping him to do his job?" kind of situation.  Even though we both signed the job offer, it still can be highly frustrating to learn that someone else makes more money for doing equal or less work.  That's pretty much the situation that I'm trying to avoid on my crews.  Given that a lot of these jobs are multi-day commitments with lodging involved, crews will talk at some point and sooner or later they'll figure out that they're not being paid the same thing should I go that route!  I definitely reward character though.  Attitude is one of the big factors I consider when deciding to hire someone back or not. 

I'm going to try and start at the top of the thread, and start with Jeff's OP...

Thanks for the outstanding reply Ray.  I appreciate the time it took you to type that out!  Yes, all my crew is hired on a per-job basis.  I don't have any regular full time or part time shop labor (yet).  At the same time, I'm usually hiring from the same group of people so I know what they're expecting to make already, so generally there aren't any negotiations.  It helps in that regard, but at the same time I also want to reward tenure and someone's reliability without upsetting the others.  What throws a wrench in this (and is the reason I started this thread) is when I end up with a situation where I'm hiring a larger crew than usual with a much wider experience base.  Yes, they'll all be doing the exact same job, but should my "regulars" who crew with me frequently get more pay than the guy I just hired from a word-of-mouth recommendation?  I see what you mean about supervisory positions, and I agree with your logic of pay for sending a new guy out with a more experienced tech.  At least in the cases I'm trying to figure out here, I will always be on site and am the direct supervisor for the show, so the chain of command is a little shorter versus really having a structured staff of varying experience.  Maybe someday I'll get to the point of having crew leads within my staff, but I'm not quite that big yet!  I agree that pay should be confidential, but again, they'll need something to chat about in the hotel rooms and sooner or later it'll come out!  I know there really isn't a definite answer to all this, but I appreciate all the input!  Thanks again! 
Logged

Philip Roberts

  • Church and H.O.W. Forums
  • Full Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 217
  • South West MI
Re: Paying Crew
« Reply #24 on: May 16, 2017, 08:00:27 PM »

One quick point on pay rates is that I agree that it's probably best for you not to disclose how much you pay one worker to another.

However as I understand it in the US you cannot require your workers to not discuss their pay.

IANAL, ....

Philip
Logged

frank kayser

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1658
  • Maryland suburbs of Washington DC
Re: Paying Crew
« Reply #25 on: May 18, 2017, 06:32:53 PM »

My career was in Fed Gov service, and those pay rates are published.


We worked side-by-side with contractors - who were compensated using various private sector models.


As Contract Officer Representative, I was aware what we were being billed for various positions.  I did not know any individual's pay, though.  Different contract suppliers had different internal operations.  One company that a former presidential candidate owned, was said to have a very strict policy with their employees: Discussing salary or any other compensation was a dismissal offense.  Your compensation was not a subject you had a right to discuss.  Period.


Other companies were different - and I came to find that some very superior individuals were getting paid an hourly rate over and above what the company was billing us.  Obviously, that had to be an exception, but it does happen.


During my tenure there, a wise person noted - Pay is seldom a good motivator of people, but discussions of pay, resulting in jealousy or some perceived unfairness in compensation, will kill any attempts at keeping morale high.
Logged

eric lenasbunt

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 861
    • Bunt Backline Event Services, LLC
Re: Paying Crew
« Reply #26 on: May 18, 2017, 09:54:04 PM »

I have fairly set rates based on the standards in my region.
If I am using freelance guys many of them have a day rate that they have set. Usually $250-400/day depending on time and roles for skilled jobs.
I occasionally will ask an overqualified tech if they want to take a gig that is lower paying. Sometimes they do, sometimes they don't. Most understand if I tell them, "I only have $250 in the budget for this one, does that work?".  I don't get offended if they say they are not interested and I don't offend them by asking that every time.

My core crew is salary or hourly, depending on position


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Logged

ProSoundWeb Community

Re: Paying Crew
« Reply #26 on: May 18, 2017, 09:54:04 PM »


Pages: 1 2 [3]   Go Up
 



Site Hosted By Ashdown Technologies, Inc.

Page created in 0.044 seconds with 21 queries.