ProSoundWeb Community

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: RCF SUB 9007-AS  (Read 1591 times)

Andrew Brubaker

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 64
    • Reliquis Productions
RCF SUB 9007-AS
« on: October 01, 2016, 01:15:40 pm »

Hi all,

Just curious if anyone has had a chance to hear these subs yet and what their real world experience has been. Do they actually go as low as advertised? They have 25-120 listed as frequency response and 20-400 listed as the -3 response. I can't find a graph anywhere to see the visual representation of this. All I see are just manufacturer listed specs. Also, I'm guessing they are not going to be all that tight and punchy seeing as they are 21s but haven't been able to hear them for myself so I am interested in hearing from anyone who has. And any idea what the approximate street cost of these will be?
Logged

Keith Broughton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2326
  • Toronto
Re: RCF SUB 9007-AS
« Reply #1 on: October 01, 2016, 03:23:21 pm »

Hi all,

Just curious if anyone has had a chance to hear these subs yet and what their real world experience has been. Do they actually go as low as advertised? They have 25-120 listed as frequency response and 20-400 listed as the -3 response. I can't find a graph anywhere to see the visual representation of this. All I see are just manufacturer listed specs. Also, I'm guessing they are not going to be all that tight and punchy seeing as they are 21s but haven't been able to hear them for myself so I am interested in hearing from anyone who has. And any idea what the approximate street cost of these will be?
I have been using the TTS56A which is very similar. They do go deep but I have to admit I don't really like the sound.
They are basically front loaded reflex speakers and as such, may be contributing to out of band harmonic distortion. Just my opinion.
That said, the EDM crowd seems to like them a lot.
Logged
I don't care enough to be apathetic

Miguel Angel Castro Rios

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 24
Re: RCF SUB 9007-AS
« Reply #2 on: October 06, 2016, 06:36:07 pm »

Hi all,

Just curious if anyone has had a chance to hear these subs yet and what their real world experience has been. Do they actually go as low as advertised? They have 25-120 listed as frequency response and 20-400 listed as the -3 response. I can't find a graph anywhere to see the visual representation of this. All I see are just manufacturer listed specs. Also, I'm guessing they are not going to be all that tight and punchy seeing as they are 21s but haven't been able to hear them for myself so I am interested in hearing from anyone who has. And any idea what the approximate street cost of these will be?

I've used the 8006, and it's one of my favorite subs. The presets and the analog delay are an amazing tool if used properly. There is no need to have 4 or 6 different signals going into the subs because of that dsp. I only send one sub signal and can do many different arrays.

For that price range, I would ask for a demo, take your mic and measure it.
Logged

Marjan Milosevic

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 216
    • MM-acoustics
Re: RCF SUB 9007-AS
« Reply #3 on: October 09, 2016, 03:41:42 pm »

I have been using the TTS56A which is very similar. They do go deep but I have to admit I don't really like the sound.
They are basically front loaded reflex speakers and as such, may be contributing to out of band harmonic distortion. Just my opinion.
That said, the EDM crowd seems to like them a lot.

No, they are not similar at all. Unlike the V baffle on the tt's , the 9007 is a pure reflex. But 15mm plywood for a 2x21 inch?

Keith Broughton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2326
  • Toronto
Re: RCF SUB 9007-AS
« Reply #4 on: October 09, 2016, 05:18:09 pm »

No, they are not similar at all. Unlike the V baffle on the tt's , the 9007 is a pure reflex.
Well, in my mind, 2x18 flat front loaded reflex is much the same as a 2x18 V front loaded reflex when compared to band pass, folded horn, Tapped horn, (etc) design.
So I see "not similar at all" as a bit of an over statement.
Logged
I don't care enough to be apathetic

Ivan Beaver

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7888
  • Atlanta GA
Re: RCF SUB 9007-AS
« Reply #5 on: October 09, 2016, 05:46:33 pm »

No, they are not similar at all. Unlike the V baffle on the tt's , the 9007 is a pure reflex. But 15mm plywood for a 2x21 inch?
Unless I am mistaken (and not understanding), the only advantage of a "V baffle", is a smaller front square footage area.

This allows you to get more drivers in a give front area.

However the tradeoff is no you have less overall cubic area inside the cabinet.

So either the cabinet needs to go taller or wider (to get the cubic area back) or be willing to accept a higher cutoff freq.
Logged
A complex question is easily answered by a simple-easy to understand WRONG answer!

Ivan Beaver
Danley Sound Labs

PHYSICS- NOT FADS!

Marjan Milosevic

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 216
    • MM-acoustics
Re: RCF SUB 9007-AS
« Reply #6 on: October 11, 2016, 06:23:16 pm »

Exactly, TT is to me a bit compromised box. So the 9007 will definitely sound different.
Pages: [1]   Go Up
 


Page created in 0.106 seconds with 18 queries.