ProSoundWeb Community

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Pages: 1 [2]  All   Go Down

Author Topic: External vs Internal crossover  (Read 9994 times)

Tim McCulloch

  • SR Forums
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 23774
  • Wichita, Kansas USA
Re: External vs Internal crossover
« Reply #10 on: May 22, 2014, 10:42:42 AM »

To Chuck's point, do we even know if a ditigal crossover filter phase inverts like an analogue?

The filter topology and number of poles (which determines the filter slope) determine it's phase behavior; digital/analog doesn't, in and of it self, have any correlation.
Logged
"If you're passing on your way, from Palm Springs to L.A., Give a wave to good ol' Dave, Say hello to progress and goodbye to the Moonlight Motor Inn." - Steve Spurgin, Moonlight Motor Inn

Jens Droessler

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 64
Re: External vs Internal crossover
« Reply #11 on: May 28, 2014, 05:42:18 PM »

The filter topology and number of poles (which determines the filter slope) determine it's phase behavior; digital/analog doesn't, in and of it self, have any correlation.
Or in other words: As long as digital equipment emulates analog circuitry (as it is the case with IIR filters, recognizable by using the same charateristics as analogue crossovers, like Linkwitz Riley, Butterworth, Bessel etc.) it will cause the same phase shifts, group delays and so on.
There are digital filters called FIR filters which can separately process frequency response and phase. These filters can't be done in the analogue domain.
Logged

ProSoundWeb Community

Re: External vs Internal crossover
« Reply #11 on: May 28, 2014, 05:42:18 PM »


Pages: 1 [2]  All   Go Up
 



Site Hosted By Ashdown Technologies, Inc.

Page created in 0.035 seconds with 25 queries.