ProSoundWeb Community

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: QSC PLD4.5 vs Ecler DT6800 (edited title)  (Read 1009 times)

Glenn James

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 87
  • Darwin, Australia
QSC PLD4.5 vs Ecler DT6800 (edited title)
« on: March 30, 2014, 09:52:04 pm »

I have some older Ecler DT6800 running my system at the moment.
These are starting to have a few issues and although a show hasn't been ruined yet, I like my reliability.
If somebody has used these before (unlikely I know) how would you compare these to the new QSC PLX4.5?
I run 4 channels per side with my current rig so I can move to a single amp for smaller shows, although I plan on running a different configuration in the future for larger gigs, including bridging channels and using a second amp per side to run the system in a different configuration.
This is the system I am running now http://atprofessional.com.au/products/firebird1000.php and the Eclers seem well matched, although I haven't used anything else to compare it with.

In short, I believe the Eclers are probably not as great as claimed, although they do a good job when working properly, and will the QSC bring my whole system to a new level?
« Last Edit: March 31, 2014, 07:28:29 pm by Glenn James »
Logged

Conrad Muzoora

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 233
  • Mbarara, Uganda. www.koolevents.co.ug
    • Kool Events Uganda
Re: QSC PLX4.5 vs Ecler DT6800
« Reply #1 on: March 31, 2014, 11:48:22 am »

There is no qsc plx4.5! You must be talking about the PLD 4.5 digital amps with 4 channels and signal processing.
Conrad


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Logged

Glenn James

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 87
  • Darwin, Australia
Re: QSC PLX4.5 vs Ecler DT6800
« Reply #2 on: March 31, 2014, 07:27:46 pm »

You are right, Conrad. Got a dud model number from the supplier.
Will see if  can change the thread title.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
 


Page created in 0.15 seconds with 24 queries.