ProSoundWeb Community

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Pages: 1 [2]  All   Go Down

Author Topic: Testing Cat 5 installation for Dante use  (Read 13911 times)

Chris Johnson [UK]

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 446
Re: Testing Cat 5 installation for Dante use
« Reply #10 on: February 11, 2014, 04:05:56 PM »

Chris, do you know what the Black Box tester doesn't do relative to the Fluke to justify the $1300 price difference? Does it really matter? This is an issue I hope to have to deal with more and more as I get to use network based audio systems more and more, and I probably should have a tester, but don't want to spend more than I need to.

Mac

Alas, I do not.

As others have suggested, probably not a lot (if anything). Fluke certainly carries a 'brand surcharge'

I don't own any of the above, as I rarely qualify cable installations myself (although I always specify that the installer should). In the UK, Flukes and others are readily available from testing equipment rental houses for very reasonable rates, so I do that for the half a dozen gigs a year that I need one...
Logged
Riedel Communications

Chris Johnson [UK]

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 446
Re: Testing Cat 5 installation for Dante use
« Reply #11 on: February 11, 2014, 04:07:45 PM »

The Black Box unit appears to use TDS to qualify wiring and the unit can be inserted between 2 TCP/IP devices to monitor negotiated connection speeds.  The latter may not be important if working mostly with AES50, but could be useful with Dante.

Its worth saying that since AES50 is an Audio over ethernet protocol (albeit only at Level 1), that these testers can be used to qualify AES50 cabling.
Logged
Riedel Communications

Chris Johnson [UK]

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 446
Re: Testing Cat 5 installation for Dante use
« Reply #12 on: February 11, 2014, 04:10:16 PM »

Some Intel and 3com NIC cards supports hadrware-level cable diagnostics


Indeed, great point Jens. The 4 port intel server NIC I have in my management PC supports this I believe.

Its worth saying though, that I don't think this is available in any laptop based NICs (or potentially any onboard NICs at all, even on server boards).
Logged
Riedel Communications

Jens Palm Bacher

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 319
    • Lydfabrikken
Re: Testing Cat 5 installation for Dante use
« Reply #13 on: February 11, 2014, 05:45:14 PM »

Indeed, great point Jens. The 4 port intel server NIC I have in my management PC supports this I believe.

Its worth saying though, that I don't think this is available in any laptop based NICs (or potentially any onboard NICs at all, even on server boards).
My Lenovo T530 with a built in Intel network card seems to support some cable testing when using the proper Intel driver.
Logged

Jim Wilkens

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 39
  • Marblehead MA
Re: Testing Cat 5 installation for Dante use
« Reply #14 on: February 11, 2014, 05:50:38 PM »

I'm looking over my notes from the SynAudCon digital audio class and it looks like a Verification class tester such as the Black Box test for continuity, graphical wire map, length, Cable ID, distance to fault, tone tracing, and PoE detection. A qualification class tester, such as the Fluke CableIQ in addition does bandwidth test, diagnostics, and load characteristics. I would think it might be worth the extra dollars to have the bandwidth test.

SynAudCon is bringing their digital audio class to Connecticut in April. I would highly recommend it.

Jim W.


I use a Black Box TS580A "LAN Performance Verifier" to test and verify category performance of all the Ethernet cables we use for digital audio.
Logged

Bob Leonard

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6807
  • Boston, MA USA
Re: Testing Cat 5 installation for Dante use
« Reply #15 on: February 11, 2014, 08:27:17 PM »

Bingo.  I can see such tools in my future.  The Black Box unit appears to use TDS to qualify wiring and the unit can be inserted between 2 TCP/IP devices to monitor negotiated connection speeds.  The latter may not be important if working mostly with AES50, but could be useful with Dante.

I don't want a $2000 piece in my tool box if $600 will do.

Mac / Tim,
There are literally 100's of cable testers on the market, and all claiming to do anything for anybody. There are testers that will qualify the cable, and testers that will certify the cable. We use the Flukes because they are considered the best regardless of type, and to be very honest I think that moniker is well justified. I think Flukes own verbiage describes the differences best.
 
"Qualification is a new category of testers designed to meet the emerging needs of network technicians who need to upgrade to higher network speeds as well as troubleshoot connectivity problems. Qualification testers, like Fluke Networks new CableIQ Qualification Tester, determines if an existing cabling link can or can not support certain network speeds and technologies. This differs from certification testers, like the DTX CableAnalyzer, which guarantees cabling installations comply with TIA/ISO performance standards and basic verification testers, like the MicroScanner Pro, which tests if the cable is connected correctly.
 
Qualification testers allow network technicians to perform a series of troubleshooting steps to better isolate cabling from network problems. For example, a first step in troubleshooting a network connectivity problem might be to check the speed and duplex settings of connected devices. If the tester shows the settings are matched, but the problem persists, a qualification test can be performed. Performing a qualification test will allow the technician to identify whether insufficient cabling bandwidth is the cause of the problem. Knowing your cabling's bandwidth capability allows you to close trouble tickets faster and helps ensure seamless upgrades to higher network speeds.

Choosing the right tool for the job
When to use a qualification tester: If you are a network technician, and need to see whether the existing cabling will support your 1000BASE-T network, a qualification tool is the right choice. If you need to troubleshoot connectivity problems and isolate cabling problems from network problems, then qualification is the perfect solution. If you have an existing network and are doing small adds, moves, and changes, or are setting up a temporary network and just need to qualify it for a specific network technology, a qualification tool is a good option.

When to use a certification tester: If you're a commercial installer or network owner who needs to prove that all cabling has been installed correctly, and meets TIA or ISO link specifications, you must certify it. If you are in a troubleshooting environment, and need to show unequivocally that the link under test is failing category 5e or 6 performance requirements according to TIA or ISO standards, your only choice is a certification tool. If you have a mixture of fiber and copper cabling, and often need to test both, cable certification tools do that best.

 To receive the support and financial security of a manufacturer's warranty, certification to TIA/ISO standards is your only option. Anything else makes the installer liable for the performance of the installation which can be quite costly. For example, a large 1000 link installation could represent a $100,000 (USD) project, which can be a hefty liability if manufacturer warranty is not obtained.

When to use a verification tool: Verification tools are typically used by any technician who pulls and terminates cable or performs basic moves, adds and changes. These tools are used as a first line of defense in finding connection and wire-pairing faults."
 
http://www.flukenetworks.com/enterprise-network/network-testing/CableIQ-Qualification-Tester
 
The Black Box Lan Scope, which runs about $2K,  will verify, can be used to certify, but does not qualify.
 
http://www.blackbox.com/Store/Detail.aspx/LanScopePro-Copper-Fiber-Network-Analyzer-Single-Mode/LANSCOPEPRO%c4%82SM
Logged
BOSTON STRONG........
Proud Vietnam Veteran

I did a gig for Otis Elevator once. Like every job, it had it's ups and downs.

Justice C. Bigler

  • SR Forums
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2794
  • Tulsa, Oklahoma
    • My homepage
Re: Testing Cat 5 installation for Dante use
« Reply #16 on: February 11, 2014, 08:41:38 PM »

Holy Hell! Those Fluke DTX Certification testers start at like $10,000!

If we are testing digital audio networks and need to verify Cat5e and Cat6 networks up to 1000mbits, will the Fluke Cable IQ handle that?

I guess the other question is how fault tolerant the digital audio networks such as Dante are? If it's only passing 912mbits will it still work for our purposes?
Logged
Justice C. Bigler
Business Rep, IATSE Local 354
www.justicebigler.com

Philip Roberts

  • Church and H.O.W. Forums
  • Full Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 217
  • South West MI
Re: Testing Cat 5 installation for Dante use
« Reply #17 on: February 13, 2014, 12:24:56 AM »

We have a Fluke DTX 1800 at my work (IT for a university). Here's an example of the detail and data it kick's out in it's reports. Typical test time is on the order of 1 minute. All newly installed cables are tested and reworked for a 100% pass rate.
http://www.andrews.edu/~rphilip/Example%20Report%202.pdf
As you will notice one of the cables in the example failed. However despite this I've had 48 channels of Dante running on this link successfully, there have however been occasional times where the network has acted up, I can't say for sure however that it's because of the over spec cable but it certainly doesn't help.

I can't really explain why all the different tests the DTX can run matter.

In addition we have various other Fluke testers like the Intelitone Pro http://www.flukenetworks.com/datacom-cabling/copper-testing/IntelliTone-Pro-Toner-and-Probe that can ID a cable and do a simple wire map.

Our desk side support guys also have what I think is a LinkRunner http://www.flukenetworks.com/enterprise-network/network-testing/LinkRunner-Network-Multimeter that they can use to to see if a given port is active and at what speed. I think this would be considered a Verification Tester.

Hope this helps.

Philip




Logged

Riley Casey

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2067
  • Wash DC
Re: Testing Cat 5 installation for Dante use
« Reply #18 on: February 13, 2014, 08:45:12 AM »

Thanks for the illuminating responses.  Great stuff from the assembled wisdom.

Ready for the punchline?  Packing my gear yesterday to go inspect and test the cabling which included power, speaker lines and the ethernet lines I got a call from the production manager.  The installers failed to finish the job and we are jumping thru hoops on Monday to install our own cables.  :o

Andrew Hollis

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 120
Re: Testing Cat 5 installation for Dante use
« Reply #19 on: February 13, 2014, 11:31:44 PM »

If you are an IT tinkerer this trick may work for you. It's fairly high-level geek stuff, but it's not exactly complicated.

iperf is a free command-line client/server network performance tool. You can specify the bandwidth, packet size, packet type (TCP or UDP), and many other parameters. The implication being you can closely simulate a Dante packet. Or just check packet loss and max bandwidth.

Because iperf is a research tool and not a commercial product, its operation is not well documented. There are many usage guides found on the internet, so it's an evening of puttering definitely.

On an endpoint you'd run the server, such as a simple iperf -s -i 2

On the other, you run the client, for example iperf -c [server ip] -t 30 -i 2. The -switches are your test parameters. You'll get something like this depending on your test:

Interval      Transfer      Bandwidth
0.0- 2.0 sec  25.9 MBytes   109 Mbits/sec


This is a pretty good guide as well. While I'm doing this, I have Windows Task Manager Networking open and I change the View to show send vs receive, that confirms a visual of the test. For example, here are tests sending 5 Mbps, 10, 20, 40, 80, 90 Mbps, but not showing the server side. This at least shows me my client can handle the output--if it didn't, you'd see peaks and valleys in the graph:

« Last Edit: February 13, 2014, 11:37:58 PM by Andrew Hollis »
Logged

ProSoundWeb Community

Re: Testing Cat 5 installation for Dante use
« Reply #19 on: February 13, 2014, 11:31:44 PM »


Pages: 1 [2]  All   Go Up
 



Site Hosted By Ashdown Technologies, Inc.

Page created in 0.037 seconds with 24 queries.