ProSoundWeb Community

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Pages: [1] 2  All   Go Down

Author Topic: Behringer X32  (Read 4640 times)

Aaron Kelley

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 14
    • Real Life Church
Behringer X32
« on: December 10, 2012, 07:32:49 pm »

So...I'm new here and I want to get to know more of you guys on the church forums.
What do you guys think about the Behringer X32? Have any of you operated or handled one?
Definitely a plus with the Midas preamps in my opinion.
If you have one installed at your church auditorium, I'd love some specs on your installation!
Logged
In regards, Aaron J. Kelley
Real Life Church, Columbus, MS
reallifems.com

Jared Koopman

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 230
Re: Behringer X32
« Reply #1 on: December 10, 2012, 07:47:00 pm »

So...I'm new here and I want to get to know more of you guys on the church forums.
What do you guys think about the Behringer X32? Have any of you operated or handled one?
Definitely a plus with the Midas preamps in my opinion.
If you have one installed at your church auditorium, I'd love some specs on your installation!

Well here are our system specs..
http://forums.prosoundweb.com/index.php/topic,138921.msg1308024.html#msg1308024

I think its a great system for the money. The biggest negative that it has is the name and perceptions associated with that name. That being said it isn't perfect and there are some compromises to be made. But in our case, it is working well. If you take away all the names and marketing, the board does what it should...easy to mix, "sounds decent", connects our stage to FOH, and allows us to multitrack record/virtual soundcheck.

I dont have much experience with other digital boards so I cannot comment on them as better or worse. If your budget is restricted to under $10k or so, then I recommend at least considering the X32 as a solution. Above that mark I think there are more options available that offer a bit more flexibility.
Logged

Frank DeWitt

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 441
    • LBP DI Box
Re: Behringer X32
« Reply #2 on: December 11, 2012, 09:32:19 am »

Well here are our system specs..
http://forums.prosoundweb.com/index.php/topic,138921.msg1308024.html#msg1308024

I think its a great system for the money. The biggest negative that it has is the name and perceptions associated with that name. That being said it isn't perfect and there are some compromises to be made. But in our case, it is working well. If you take away all the names and marketing, the board does what it should...easy to mix, "sounds decent", connects our stage to FOH, and allows us to multitrack record/virtual soundcheck.

I dont have much experience with other digital boards so I cannot comment on them as better or worse. If your budget is restricted to under $10k or so, then I recommend at least considering the X32 as a solution. Above that mark I think there are more options available that offer a bit more flexibility.

Arron, First, Welcome.  Glad your here.  I think you are not getting a lot of comment on this because a lot of us feel it has all been said.   As has already been said, it seems like a great mixer from a company with a ....  Well, Not a history to be proud of.  Some searching of this forum or a Google search will get you a lot of data.  I personally am of the burned 5 times, not again camp.  Others feel this is a whole new direction for Behringer.  I hope they are right.
Logged

Aaron Kelley

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 14
    • Real Life Church
Re: Behringer X32
« Reply #3 on: December 11, 2012, 10:20:21 am »

Arron, First, Welcome.  Glad your here.  I think you are not getting a lot of comment on this because a lot of us feel it has all been said.   As has already been said, it seems like a great mixer from a company with a ....  Well, Not a history to be proud of.  Some searching of this forum or a Google search will get you a lot of data.  I personally am of the burned 5 times, not again camp.  Others feel this is a whole new direction for Behringer.  I hope they are right.
Yeah I am figuring that out now as I get more adjusted to this forum. I don't think it'll allow you to remove it lol. But thanks!
Logged
In regards, Aaron J. Kelley
Real Life Church, Columbus, MS
reallifems.com

Jared Koopman

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 230
Re: Behringer X32
« Reply #4 on: December 11, 2012, 10:44:02 am »

Yeah I am figuring that out now as I get more adjusted to this forum. I don't think it'll allow you to remove it lol. But thanks!

also if you have not seen it, check out this thread http://soundforums.net/junior-varsity/4393-x32-discussion.html It is a very long thread with pretty much the history of the X32 and anything else in between.

Do you have any specific questions about it?
Logged

Frank DeWitt

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 441
    • LBP DI Box
Re: Behringer X32
« Reply #5 on: December 11, 2012, 02:12:22 pm »

Yeah I am figuring that out now as I get more adjusted to this forum. I don't think it'll allow you to remove it lol. But thanks!

No need to delete,  no harm done.  What are your needs, wants, in a new mixer. Things like how many channels. Need for growth. need a digital snake or will analog work?  How about your FOH location?  is it a good one?  Do you have or need IEMs?  Kind of service? Other uses?  Who's on first?
Logged

dick rees

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4783
  • St Paul MN
Re: Behringer X32
« Reply #6 on: December 11, 2012, 02:17:46 pm »

Logged
Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain...

Don Sullivan

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 26
Re: Behringer X32
« Reply #7 on: December 23, 2012, 12:04:00 pm »

I've recently spent quite a few hours on an X32. I met two gentlemen at a local music store who were returning the unit b/c it was "too complicated". I've since trained them on the unit and they are quite happy. The desk has a pretty nice sound but there are a number of petty annoyances I have with the mixer which will keep me a happy Yamaha user for a while:

1. Where did they put those headphone jacks>? Oh- in the side handles. That's ten minutes of my life I will never get back. It is nice, however that there are two headphone outputs, especially when teaching how to use the desk. Unfortunately, the headphone amps need more gain to do the common task of soloing up an open mic to see if it is working.

2. Too many nested menu levels. Try to re-name the channel strip without cracking open the PDF manual.... I will wait...... I'm still waiting..... Yeah - I don't really like have to press 4 or 5 navigation keys to do something so basic. Nice however to have the b/g color on the channel strip, makes reaching for a fader more intuitive. 

3. Console has input routing, but it looks like only in groups of 8. At least that is what I glean from the UI and manual. This will make it a little tough to bring in a single channel multiple times like I often to on the M7 or 01v96.

4. Console has 16 mix buss and 8 effects, but only 4 of the effects can have their input coming from a mix bus. the other 4 have to be used as insert effects, patched into an input, or as an insert in a mix bus master, which kind of makes them useable, but it takes a long time to achieve this.

Admittedly, these are petty annoyances. The console does sound very nice. The pre-amps are quiet, the effects (the ones I've tried) are effective, the compressors and gates work well, the EQ sounds natural, but frankly I use very little.  There ARE delays available on all the analog outputs and inputs (one of the reasons I won't use a Presonus desk for live work) The USB recorder works pretty well, but you will need a class 6 or better memory stick. The USB output for multi-track is pretty easy to use.

Is the console a good value? You be the judge. My own preference is toward an 01v96 with additional preamps. If recallable preamps are of value to you, perhaps you should give this desk consideration.



Logged

Scott Wagner

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 632
  • Richmond, VA
Re: Behringer X32
« Reply #8 on: December 23, 2012, 02:02:36 pm »

I've recently spent quite a few hours on an X32. I met two gentlemen at a local music store who were returning the unit b/c it was "too complicated". I've since trained them on the unit and they are quite happy. The desk has a pretty nice sound but there are a number of petty annoyances I have with the mixer which will keep me a happy Yamaha user for a while:

1. Where did they put those headphone jacks>? Oh- in the side handles. That's ten minutes of my life I will never get back. It is nice, however that there are two headphone outputs, especially when teaching how to use the desk. Unfortunately, the headphone amps need more gain to do the common task of soloing up an open mic to see if it is working.

2. Too many nested menu levels. Try to re-name the channel strip without cracking open the PDF manual.... I will wait...... I'm still waiting..... Yeah - I don't really like have to press 4 or 5 navigation keys to do something so basic. Nice however to have the b/g color on the channel strip, makes reaching for a fader more intuitive. 

3. Console has input routing, but it looks like only in groups of 8. At least that is what I glean from the UI and manual. This will make it a little tough to bring in a single channel multiple times like I often to on the M7 or 01v96.

4. Console has 16 mix buss and 8 effects, but only 4 of the effects can have their input coming from a mix bus. the other 4 have to be used as insert effects, patched into an input, or as an insert in a mix bus master, which kind of makes them useable, but it takes a long time to achieve this.

Admittedly, these are petty annoyances. The console does sound very nice. The pre-amps are quiet, the effects (the ones I've tried) are effective, the compressors and gates work well, the EQ sounds natural, but frankly I use very little.  There ARE delays available on all the analog outputs and inputs (one of the reasons I won't use a Presonus desk for live work) The USB recorder works pretty well, but you will need a class 6 or better memory stick. The USB output for multi-track is pretty easy to use.

Is the console a good value? You be the judge. My own preference is toward an 01v96 with additional preamps. If recallable preamps are of value to you, perhaps you should give this desk consideration.
This old analog dog has sipped the KoolAid.  Having recently added one of these to the herd, I'll try to help.

1.  A quick look at the manual would have saved you 10 minutes.
2.  Want to label a channel?  Hold the channel's select button and press the utility button.  Done.
3.  It's true there are groups of eight for input routing, but for what you want to do (assign an input to multiple channels) it's easy to do on a per-channel basis with no annoying "groups of eight" nonsense.
4.  It takes a long time to insert an effect into a mix buss?  You must be a lot slower than I am.

I've found this desk to be intuitive, flexible, and decent sounding.  I'm happy to have it in inventory.  It seems to be fairly solid, but time will tell in that department.
Logged
Scott Wagner
Big Nickel Audio

Thomas Lamb

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Online Online
  • Posts: 382
Re: Behringer X32
« Reply #9 on: December 23, 2012, 04:45:14 pm »

So...I'm new here and I want to get to know more of you guys on the church forums.
What do you guys think about the Behringer X32? Have any of you operated or handled one?
Definitely a plus with the Midas preamps in my opinion.
If you have one installed at your church auditorium, I'd love some specs on your installation!

Played with it a few times. It's not a bad layout. I can't really say anything to bad Bout it. But we chose to go with GLD it cost a little more money but we felt overall it was more flexible, had a good reputation, and Ilive has several years worth of reputation in the digital market. I have had good experiences with several behringer products ultately though they died too soon! I need someone else to have a few years behind one before I will be willing to spend money on one. I do hope it creates a good rep for behringer.
Logged
bigTlamb

"If you suck on a functional analog desk, you'll really suck on a complex digital desk...." Dick Rees
Pages: [1] 2  All   Go Up
 


Page created in 0.111 seconds with 23 queries.