ProSoundWeb Community

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Pages: 1 [2]  All   Go Down

Author Topic: 01V96 effects routing question.  (Read 6692 times)

Dave Rickard

  • SR Forums
  • Full Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 102
Re: 01V96 effects routing question.
« Reply #10 on: December 08, 2012, 12:54:17 AM »

Thanks Eric! That worked.

I also needed to remove it from the stereo mix from the standard routing menu.

It's interesting that YAMAHA didn't provide a simple way to serially connect the FX processors. Must be a reason somewhere.
Logged
The wrong piece of gear at the right price, is still the wrong piece of gear.

Eric Christian

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 47
Re: 01V96 effects routing question.
« Reply #11 on: December 08, 2012, 01:29:15 AM »

I also needed to remove it from the stereo mix from the standard routing menu.

I'm curious why you wouldn't also want the dry delay signal in your stereo mix?  Are you not running the mix setting on your reverb effect at 100%? Maybe I'm misunderstanding the type of delay effect your going for?

Anyway, glad it's working for you.  :)
Logged

Dave Rickard

  • SR Forums
  • Full Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 102
Re: 01V96 effects routing question.
« Reply #12 on: December 08, 2012, 04:57:49 PM »

I'm pretty sure I heard latency artifacts in the delayed sound when it was in both buses.
Logged
The wrong piece of gear at the right price, is still the wrong piece of gear.

Mark McFarlane

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1946
Re: 01V96 effects routing question.
« Reply #13 on: December 10, 2012, 03:44:20 AM »

I'm pretty sure I heard latency artifacts in the delayed sound when it was in both buses.

Are you saying you heard latency artifacts when you had both these paths enabled

Aux 7 > Delay > Aux 6 Reverb > LR, and
AUX 7 > Delay > LR  ?

If so, it makes sense to me that chaining the FX's would add additional latency and what you heard is correct.

Logged
Mark McFarlane

Dave Rickard

  • SR Forums
  • Full Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 102
Re: 01V96 effects routing question.
« Reply #14 on: December 10, 2012, 11:52:36 AM »

That is what I'm saying. 
Logged
The wrong piece of gear at the right price, is still the wrong piece of gear.

Tim McCulloch

  • SR Forums
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 23736
  • Wichita, Kansas USA
Re: 01V96 effects routing question.
« Reply #15 on: December 10, 2012, 11:58:01 AM »

That is what I'm saying.

Is the delay set for 100% wet?
Logged
"If you're passing on your way, from Palm Springs to L.A., Give a wave to good ol' Dave, Say hello to progress and goodbye to the Moonlight Motor Inn." - Steve Spurgin, Moonlight Motor Inn

Mark McFarlane

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1946
Re: 01V96 effects routing question.
« Reply #16 on: December 11, 2012, 04:37:41 AM »

That is what I'm saying.

It seems like when I measured this console that a pass through the FX inserted an additional delay (regardless of the wet/dry setting in the FX slot), so what you are hearing matched what I measured.

Edit: I measured .14ms for latency introduced by the effects unit at 96KHz.  I did the measurement last summer.   Probably fairly hard to hear this without headphones, even then...
« Last Edit: December 11, 2012, 04:46:57 AM by Mark McFarlane »
Logged
Mark McFarlane

ProSoundWeb Community

Re: 01V96 effects routing question.
« Reply #16 on: December 11, 2012, 04:37:41 AM »


Pages: 1 [2]  All   Go Up
 



Site Hosted By Ashdown Technologies, Inc.

Page created in 0.034 seconds with 24 queries.